Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to approval under section 10(23C)(iv) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 on the footing that its seed certification activity amounted to an institution established for charitable purposes, namely advancement of an object of general public utility.
Analysis: The statutory scheme permits approval only where the institution is established for charitable purposes as understood in section 2(15) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Although advancement of any other object of general public utility falls within the definition, the proviso excludes cases where the activity involves trade, commerce or business, or rendering any service in relation to such activity for a fee or other consideration. The petitioner's certification function, though carried out under the Seeds Act, 1966, was found to facilitate the sale and marketing of certified seeds by its clients and agents. The Court held that the service was rendered in relation to trade, commerce or business and therefore fell within the proviso exclusion.
Conclusion: The petitioner was not entitled to approval under section 10(23C)(iv) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and the rejection by the prescribed authority was upheld.