Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the withdrawal of registration granted under section 12AA was justified on the ground that the assessee's activities attracted the proviso to section 2(15) and were not being carried on in accordance with its stated charitable objects.
Analysis: The assessee had been granted registration under section 12AA and the authority sought to cancel it on two grounds: application of the proviso to section 2(15) and alleged deviation from the objects of the society. The CBDT circular relied upon clarifies that cancellation of registration is not warranted merely because section 2(15) operates, and cancellation must be tested strictly under section 12AA(3) and section 12AA(4). However, the jurisdictional High Court, in the assessee's own matter, had already held on similar facts that the seed certification activity facilitated trade in certified seeds, involved rendering services in relation to trade or commerce for consideration, and therefore did not amount to advancement of an object of general public utility within the meaning of section 2(15). Following that binding view, the Tribunal held that the assessee's activities lost charitable character for the purposes relevant to registration cancellation.
Conclusion: The withdrawal of registration under section 12AA(3) was upheld and the assessee's challenge failed.