TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the trust's objects fell within "education" or within the residual head of "advancement of any other object of general public utility" under section 2(15) of the Income-tax Act, 1961; (ii) Whether the trust's activities satisfied the requirement that the object should not involve the carrying on of any activity for profit.
Issue (i): Whether the trust's objects fell within "education" or within the residual head of "advancement of any other object of general public utility" under section 2(15) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The object of the trust, read with its deed and actual working, was not systematic schooling or training in the ordinary legal sense of education. The dominant activity was publishing newspapers and journals to supply an organ of educated public opinion, which was treated as a purpose of general public utility rather than education. The earlier understanding of "charitable purpose" under the 1922 Act was not controlling in the same manner after the 1961 amendment.
Conclusion: The trust did not fall within "education"; it fell within "advancement of any other object of general public utility."
Issue (ii): Whether the trust's activities satisfied the requirement that the object should not involve the carrying on of any activity for profit.
Analysis: The 1961 definition added a qualifying restriction to the residual head of charity, so exemption depended on the purpose not involving profit-making activity. On the facts, the trust carried on a substantial and regular newspaper and publishing business, generated large receipts from sales, advertisements, and job printing, and the deed gave wide powers permitting commercial operation and profit accumulation without restriction. The terms and working of the trust showed that profit-making was inherent in the activity and not merely incidental.
Conclusion: The trust's purpose involved the carrying on of an activity for profit and therefore was not entitled to exemption.
Final Conclusion: The income of the trust was not exempt under section 11 read with section 2(15) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and the appeal failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Under section 2(15) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, a trust claiming the residual head of general public utility must show that its purpose does not involve the carrying on of an activity for profit; where the trust in substance conducts a profitable commercial publishing business without restrictive charitable control, exemption is unavailable.
TaxTMI 
