TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Interest Deduction Denied: Tribunal Affirms Non-Taxability of Interest on Dividend-Related Borrowed Capital.</h1> <h3>Harish Krishnakant Bhatt. Versus Income-Tax Officer.</h3> Harish Krishnakant Bhatt. Versus Income-Tax Officer. - ITD 091, 311, TTJ 085, 872, [2005] 278 ITR (A. T.) 1 (ITAT [Ahm]) Issues Involved:1. Whether the interest paid by the assessee of Rs. 5,69,739 is an allowable deduction.2. Applicability of section 14A in relation to dividend income exempt u/s 10(33) and tax levied on the company u/s 115-O.3. The relevance of the assessee's arguments regarding the allowability of interest expenditure against other heads of income.4. The impact of section 14A's proviso on reassessment and enhancement of assessment.Issue 1: Allowability of Interest DeductionThe main issue was whether the interest paid by the assessee of Rs. 5,69,739 is an allowable deduction since the dividend income to which it pertained is not chargeable to tax in the hands of the shareholder due to section 10(33) and section 115-O of the Finance Act, 1997. The shares were acquired when dividend income was taxable.Issue 2: Applicability of Section 14AThe Assessing Officer disallowed the deduction citing section 14A r.w.s. 10(33) & 115-O, stating that no deduction shall be allowed for expenditure incurred in relation to income that does not form part of total income. The CIT(A) upheld this disallowance, noting the clear nexus between borrowed sums and non-income generating assets, and that the law applicable was the one during the assessment year when dividend income was non-taxable.Issue 3: Assessee's ArgumentsThe assessee argued that:- The interest expenditure was on investments made when dividends were taxable.- The dividend is still taxable, but the tax collection procedure has shifted to the company.- The expenditure should be allowable against income from the sale of shares or other heads.- The investment in shares was linked to earning remuneration, which is taxable.- The interest-bearing liabilities were less than the total liabilities.However, these arguments were rejected by the Assessing Officer and CIT(A), who emphasized that the law during the relevant assessment year, which exempted dividend income, was applicable.Issue 4: Proviso to Section 14AThe assessee contended that disallowance in scrutiny assessment u/s 143(3) amounts to enhancement prohibited by the proviso to section 14A, which prevents reassessment or enhancement for years before April 1, 2001. The Tribunal rejected this contention, clarifying that scrutiny assessment is not reassessment or enhancement.Tribunal's DecisionThe Tribunal upheld the disallowance, stating:- The interest paid on borrowed capital for acquiring shares was allowable only against dividend income when it was taxable.- With the dividend income now exempt u/s 10(33), the interest expenditure is not allowable as it relates to non-taxable income.- The tax paid by the company u/s 115-O does not make the dividend taxable in the hands of the shareholder.- The interest expenditure cannot be shifted to other heads of income or future capital gains.ConclusionThe appeal was dismissed, affirming that the interest expenditure of Rs. 5,69,739 was not allowable as a deduction due to the provisions of section 14A and the exemption of dividend income u/s 10(33).
TaxTMI 