Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Director-General of Supplies and Disposals, in disposing of condemned military motor vehicles after deducting departmental charges and crediting the balance to the Military Department, was a dealer carrying on business so as to make the assessees liable as first sellers under the sales tax law.
Analysis: The decisive test was whether the activity amounted to business with a profit motive. The mere fact that the Director-General of Supplies and Disposals charged departmental expenses and used office machinery to secure the best price did not, by itself, establish a trading venture. The sales were of unusable or condemned government vehicles belonging to the Military Department, and the Director-General acted only as the instrument or agent of that Department. On the materials available, no course of business dealings or profit-making enterprise could be attributed either to the Military Department or to its selling agent. The burden of showing that the assessee was only a subsequent dealer was not discharged.
Conclusion: The Director-General of Supplies and Disposals was not shown to be a dealer carrying on business in respect of the disputed sales, and the assessees were correctly assessed to tax as first sellers.
Ratio Decidendi: Disposal of condemned government goods through an agent, without a profit motive or business activity, does not constitute business or dealer status for sales tax purposes.