Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the co-operative societies running canteens were dealers carrying on the business of selling goods so as to attract sales tax, and whether the supply of eatables, drinks, refreshments and other articles to members and non-members constituted sales liable to tax under the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941.
Analysis: Liability under the charging provision arose only if the assessee was a dealer carrying on the business of selling goods. The society's incorporation, subsidised canteen arrangement, and no-profit-no-loss character were not decisive by themselves. The decisive inquiry was the real nature of the activity. If the transactions were protected by mutuality or agency, the society would not be carrying on business; but where the canteen supplied goods to members and non-members as a regular trading activity, the fact that the goods were sold at cheap rates or that the activity was socially desirable did not prevent it from being business. The supply of refreshments and articles was not a mere amenity in the sense of hospitality, and no mutuality or agency was established.
Conclusion: The societies were dealers carrying on business, and the supplies to members and non-members were sales liable to sales tax.