TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether clause (g) of section 2(viii) of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963, inserted by the Kerala Finance Act, 1998, was constitutionally valid and within the legislative competence of the State. (ii) Whether a bank selling pledged gold ornaments by public auction for recovery of loan dues is a dealer carrying on business so as to attract tax under the Act.
Issue (i): Whether clause (g) of section 2(viii) of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963, inserted by the Kerala Finance Act, 1998, was constitutionally valid and within the legislative competence of the State.
Analysis: The charging scheme of the Act was read with the extended definition of dealer introduced by clause (g), which specifically brings within its fold a bank or financial institution selling pledged gold or other valuable articles for realisation of the loan amount. The power of the State under entry 54 of List II, read with article 366(29A) of the Constitution of India, was treated as wide enough to support taxation of such sales. The amendment was held not to offend articles 14 or 19 of the Constitution of India.
Conclusion: The amendment was upheld as constitutionally valid and within legislative competence.
Issue (ii): Whether a bank selling pledged gold ornaments by public auction for recovery of loan dues is a dealer carrying on business so as to attract tax under the Act.
Analysis: The definition of business under section 2(vi) of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963, and the provisions of sections 6 and 8 of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949, were construed together. The Court held that banking companies are permitted to deal with property coming into their possession in satisfaction of claims and to realise security, and that the sale of pledged ornaments is part of, or at least incidental to, the banking business. In any event, after the 1998 amendment, clause (g) specifically covers such sales whether or not they occur in the course of business.
Conclusion: The bank was held liable to be treated as a dealer for such auction sales and the transactions were held exigible to tax.
Final Conclusion: The challenge to the levy failed, and the notices and taxability of auction sales of pledged gold ornaments were sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the statute expressly includes banks selling pledged valuables for loan recovery within the definition of dealer, the levy is constitutionally supported and such sales are taxable as part of, or incidental to, the banking business.
TaxTMI 
