Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the auction sale of gold bullion and other offerings made by devotees to the Devasthanam constituted business so as to render the assessee a dealer liable to sales tax under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959.
Analysis: The object of the scheme governing the Devasthanam was the maintenance of the temple and its allied religious and charitable endowments, and the power to sell offerings in public auction was only incidental to that religious object. On the statutory definitions of "dealer" and "business", liability could arise only if the activity was connected with trade or commerce in a commercial sense. The auction of devotees' offerings was not a commercial venture, and the Revenue's reliance on cases involving pawn brokers, banks, or trading companies was inapposite because those activities were carried on in the course of business. The controlling principle was that where the main activity is not business, incidental sales do not become business unless an independent intention to carry on business is established.
Conclusion: The auction sale was not business, the assessee was not a dealer in respect of that transaction, and the levy of sales tax was unsustainable.
Ratio Decidendi: A transaction that is merely incidental to a purely religious or charitable object does not amount to business or create dealer liability unless the Department proves an independent commercial intention to carry on that activity.