Market disruption findings require determination of import injury, causal link, and recommended safeguard duty amount and duration. Rule 11 requires the Director General to determine within the prescribed period whether increased imports have caused or threatened market disruption to the domestic industry and whether a causal link exists between the imports and that disruption. The Director General must also recommend the amount and duration of safeguard duty needed to prevent or remedy market disruption. Affirmative final findings must state the material facts, legal basis, and reasons, and must be recorded by public notice and sent to the Central Government in the Ministries dealing with Commerce and Finance.
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Market disruption findings require determination of import injury, causal link, and recommended safeguard duty amount and duration.
Rule 11 requires the Director General to determine within the prescribed period whether increased imports have caused or threatened market disruption to the domestic industry and whether a causal link exists between the imports and that disruption. The Director General must also recommend the amount and duration of safeguard duty needed to prevent or remedy market disruption. Affirmative final findings must state the material facts, legal basis, and reasons, and must be recorded by public notice and sent to the Central Government in the Ministries dealing with Commerce and Finance.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
