Safeguard duty reviews assess market disruption, supporting continuation, withdrawal, or variation through prescribed procedures and timelines. The Director General periodically reviews whether transitional product-specific safeguard duty remains necessary to prevent or remedy market disruption. The review may support continued imposition, withdrawal, or variation of the duty, including after a mandatory mid-term review where the duty has continued for more than three years. A review must ordinarily be concluded within eight months of initiation, subject to an extension permitted by the Central Government. Procedural provisions governing initiation, investigation, findings, and related matters apply correspondingly.
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Safeguard duty reviews assess market disruption, supporting continuation, withdrawal, or variation through prescribed procedures and timelines.
The Director General periodically reviews whether transitional product-specific safeguard duty remains necessary to prevent or remedy market disruption. The review may support continued imposition, withdrawal, or variation of the duty, including after a mandatory mid-term review where the duty has continued for more than three years. A review must ordinarily be concluded within eight months of initiation, subject to an extension permitted by the Central Government. Procedural provisions governing initiation, investigation, findings, and related matters apply correspondingly.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
