Market disruption determinations require objective evidence, quantifiable industry factors, and a demonstrated causal link to increased imports. The Director General must assess market disruption by examining objective and quantifiable factors, including increased import volumes and market share, domestic sales, production, productivity, capacity utilisation, profits and losses, and employment. A determination requires objective evidence establishing a causal link between increased imports and the disruption or threat. Where other factors are simultaneously responsible, the disruption must not be attributed to increased imports, and the complaint may be referred for appropriate anti-dumping or countervailing duty investigation.
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Market disruption determinations require objective evidence, quantifiable industry factors, and a demonstrated causal link to increased imports.
The Director General must assess market disruption by examining objective and quantifiable factors, including increased import volumes and market share, domestic sales, production, productivity, capacity utilisation, profits and losses, and employment. A determination requires objective evidence establishing a causal link between increased imports and the disruption or threat. Where other factors are simultaneously responsible, the disruption must not be attributed to increased imports, and the complaint may be referred for appropriate anti-dumping or countervailing duty investigation.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
