Make available test under the India-UK treaty limits taxation of mixed management services and withholding treatment.

Under Article 13(4)(c) of the India-UK treaty, technical or consultancy services are taxable as fees for technical services only if they "make available" technical knowledge, experience, skill, know-how or processes so the recipient can use them independently later. Applying that test, the service fee under the Global Management Services Agreement had mixed components: some services were managerial or did not make available knowledge, while others, including software training, accounting skill feedback, tax planning advice, and systems design or IT policy implementation, did satisfy the treaty test. The fee was therefore not wholly taxable, and withholding could not be ruled on in blanket terms; the extent and rate had to be determined under section 195.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the service fee paid under the Global Management Services Agreement was wholly taxable as royalties or fees for technical services under Article 13 of the India-UK treaty. (ii) Whether tax had to be deducted at source on the service fee and at what rate.

Issue (i): Whether the service fee paid under the Global Management Services Agreement was wholly taxable as royalties or fees for technical services under Article 13 of the India-UK treaty.

Analysis: The domestic definition of fees for technical services under section 9(1)(vii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 is wider, but Article 13(4)(c) of the treaty limits taxation to technical or consultancy services that make available technical knowledge, experience, skill, know-how or processes, or transfer a technical plan or design. The expression "make available" requires transmission of knowledge or skill so that the recipient can apply it independently in future. Applying that test, the services described in the agreement and supporting note were mixed in character. Many were technical or consultancy services but did not make available knowledge to the applicant, while some services such as training on accounting software, feedback for improving accounting skills, tax planning advice, systems design and implementation of IT policies did satisfy the treaty test. Some services were managerial in nature and some could not be clearly classified on the material placed.

Conclusion: The service fee was not wholly taxable as fees for technical services under the treaty, but some components were taxable and some were not.

Issue (ii): Whether tax had to be deducted at source on the service fee and at what rate.

Analysis: Because the material did not permit a finding that the entire service fee fell outside the treaty, the question of deduction at source could not be answered in a blanket manner. The appropriate course was for the applicant to seek a determination under section 195 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and the competent authority would decide the extent and rate of deduction in the light of the ruling. The Authority also noted that any such determination would not prejudice the payee and that transfer pricing principles under section 92 could still be applied where relevant.

Conclusion: No blanket ruling was given that tax deduction was unnecessary or that a fixed rate applied; the issue was left to determination under section 195.

Final Conclusion: The ruling accepted the treaty "make available" restriction, held that the services had to be classified component-wise, and declined to treat the entire fee as either fully taxable or fully exempt from withholding.

Ratio Decidendi: Under Article 13(4)(c) of the India-UK treaty, technical or consultancy services are taxable as fees for technical services only when they make available technical knowledge, experience, skill, know-how or processes to the recipient so that it can use them independently in future.

---