Tribunal: Professional fees to non-residents not taxable under DTAA

The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s order, dismissing the Revenue's appeal. It found that the professional fees paid to non-resident entities were not taxable in India under the relevant DTAAs, thus no tax deduction at source was required, and no disallowance under Section 40(a)(i) could be made.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Deletion of addition due to non-deduction of tax at source on payments made to non-resident parties.
2. Applicability of Article 15 of DTAAs to limited liability partnership firms.
3. Classification of payments as Fee for Technical Services under DTAAs.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Deletion of Addition Due to Non-Deduction of Tax at Source:
The Revenue appealed against the order of the Ld. CIT(A)-18, New Delhi, which deleted the addition of Rs. 1,98,28,897/- made by the AO. The AO had added this amount because the assessee failed to deduct tax at source on payments made to non-resident parties for professional fees, thereby committing a default under Section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The CIT(A) had previously adjudicated a similar issue in the assessee's case for the assessment year 2010-11, where it was held that the services rendered by the non-resident entities were not in the nature of independent personal services and thus not subject to tax deduction at source.

2. Applicability of Article 15 of DTAAs to Limited Liability Partnership Firms:
The Revenue contended that Article 15 of the respective DTAAs applies only to individuals, not to limited liability partnership firms. However, the CIT(A) and the Tribunal found that the professional services rendered by the non-resident entities, which included lawyering and accounting, were indeed covered under Article 15 of the relevant DTAAs. The CIT(A) analyzed various DTAAs, including those with the UK, USA, Netherlands, and France, and concluded that these agreements allow the benefit of Article 15 to both individuals and firms of individuals, including LLPs. The Tribunal upheld this finding, noting that the professional fees paid were for services rendered outside India, with no fixed base or permanent establishment in India, making the income taxable only in the country of residence of the service provider.

3. Classification of Payments as Fee for Technical Services:
The CIT(A) further analyzed whether the payments made to the non-resident entities could be classified as Fee for Technical Services (FTS) under the DTAAs. It was found that the services provided did not involve the "make available" clause, meaning that no technical knowledge, experience, or skill was transferred to the assessee that could be used independently in the future. The Tribunal cited various judicial precedents supporting this view, including decisions from Cushman & Wakefield (S) Pte., Sandvik Australia Pty. Ltd., and CIT Vs. De Beers India Minerals Pvt. Ltd., among others. The Tribunal concluded that the payments did not qualify as FTS under Article 13 of the respective DTAAs, thus not requiring tax deduction at source under Section 195 of the Act.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s order, dismissing the Revenue's appeal. It found no material change in the facts from the previous assessment year and concluded that the professional fees paid to non-resident entities were not taxable in India under the relevant DTAAs. Consequently, the assessee was not liable for tax deduction at source, and no disallowance under Section 40(a)(i) could be made. The Tribunal's decision was pronounced in the open court on 25/07/2019.

---