Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2014 (2) TMI 312 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal directs reassessment of ALP, disagrees with disallowance under Income Tax Act The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee's appeal by directing the AO/TPO to recompute the Arm's Length Price (ALP) in accordance with its directions. The ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Tribunal directs reassessment of ALP, disagrees with disallowance under Income Tax Act

                          The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee's appeal by directing the AO/TPO to recompute the Arm's Length Price (ALP) in accordance with its directions. The Tribunal disagreed with the disallowance of communication and circuit charges under Section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, stating they were not fees for technical services. Certain companies were excluded as comparables for Transfer Pricing Analysis due to functional dissimilarity and other reasons. Adjustment for differences in depreciation rates was remitted for fresh consideration, and pre-operative expenses were directed to be excluded from operating costs for ALP computation.




                          Issues Involved
                          1. Disallowance of communication and circuit charges under Section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act.
                          2. Selection of comparables for Transfer Pricing (TP) analysis.
                          3. Adjustment for differences in depreciation rates.
                          4. Inclusion of pre-operative expenses in operating costs.

                          Detailed Analysis

                          Disallowance of Communication and Circuit Charges under Section 40(a)(ia)
                          The assessee challenged the disallowance of Rs.10,77,733/- under Section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, arguing that the payments made for communication and circuit charges were not fees for technical services and thus not liable for TDS under Section 194J. The Assessing Officer (AO) and CIT(A) disagreed, treating these charges as fees for technical services. However, the Tribunal, referencing decisions from other cases (e.g., ACIT vs. Hughes Software Systems Ltd., Ushodaya Enterprises P. Ltd.), concluded that the services did not involve human intervention and thus did not qualify as technical services. Consequently, the Tribunal directed the AO to allow the expenditure claimed, treating these grounds as allowed.

                          Selection of Comparables for Transfer Pricing Analysis
                          The assessee contested the inclusion of certain companies as comparables by the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO). The Tribunal examined each contested comparable:

                          - Vishal Information Technologies Ltd.: Excluded due to functional dissimilarity and significant outsourcing of operations, as established in previous tribunal decisions (e.g., Capital IQ Information Systems India Pvt. Ltd.).
                          - Maple E Solutions Ltd.: Excluded due to functional dissimilarity and unreliable financial results, supported by previous tribunal decisions and the assessee's own case history.
                          - Nucleus Netsoft and GIS India Ltd.: Directed the AO/TPO to exclude if substantial differences in employee costs were found, following the precedent set in HSBC Electronic Data Processing India Pvt. Ltd.
                          - WIPRO BPO Solutions Ltd.: Excluded due to incomparable scale of operations, brand value, and turnover, as supported by decisions in similar cases (e.g., Capital IQ Information Systems India Pvt. Ltd.).

                          Adjustment for Differences in Depreciation Rates
                          The assessee argued for adjustments due to differences in depreciation rates between itself and the comparables. The Tribunal, referencing its own decision in the assessee's case for the previous year, directed the AO/TPO to either make suitable adjustments for depreciation differences or consider profit before depreciation while computing the margin. This issue was remitted for fresh consideration.

                          Inclusion of Pre-Operative Expenses in Operating Costs
                          The assessee contended that pre-operative expenses of Rs.44,00,457/- should not be included in operating costs for ALP computation. The Tribunal found no material evidence supporting the department's claim that these expenses were recovered from the AE. Citing the decision in DCIT vs. Convergys Information Management India Pvt. Ltd., the Tribunal directed the AO/TPO to exclude pre-operative expenses from operating costs, as the agreement with the AE was entered into post-incorporation.

                          Conclusion
                          The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee's appeal, directing the AO/TPO to recompute the ALP in accordance with the Tribunal's directions and make necessary adjustments. The appeal was disposed of with specific instructions to address the issues raised comprehensively.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found