TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the consideration payable for the data processing services was taxable as fees for technical services under Article 13 of the India-UK Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement and under section 9(1)(vii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. (ii) Whether, if the amount was not taxable in India, tax was required to be withheld under section 195 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Issue (i): Whether the consideration payable for the data processing services was taxable as fees for technical services under Article 13 of the India-UK Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement and under section 9(1)(vii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The services consisted of sorting, reviewing, scanning, batching, transmitting and other routine data-processing functions. They did not involve rendering of managerial, technical or consultancy services in the statutory sense. Under Article 13, fees for technical services are taxable only where technical knowledge, experience, skill, know-how or processes are made available to the recipient. On the facts, no such transfer of technical knowledge or enduring skill occurred, and the service provider merely continued to perform the work itself. The same conclusion followed under section 9(1)(vii), because the activities were not managerial, technical or consultancy services.
Conclusion: The consideration was not taxable as fees for technical services under the treaty or under the Act, and the answer on this issue was in the negative.
Issue (ii): Whether, if the amount was not taxable in India, tax was required to be withheld under section 195 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The withholding obligation under section 195 arises only where the sum paid is chargeable to tax in India. Since the underlying payment was held not chargeable to tax, no obligation to deduct tax at source survived.
Conclusion: No tax was required to be withheld under section 195.
Final Conclusion: The ruling held that the payments for the data processing services were not taxable in India and, consequently, no withholding tax liability arose on remittance.
Ratio Decidendi: Routine data-processing services do not become fees for technical services unless they render technical knowledge, skill or know-how available to the recipient; absent such making available, neither the treaty nor the domestic law treats the consideration as taxable technical services income.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
