Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether tax was required to be withheld under section 195 on remittances made to the non-resident parent towards professional support services, client-related expenses and computer maintenance charges, having regard to the India-USA tax treaty and the nature of the payments.
Analysis: The payments for professional support services were found to be neither technical in nature nor to satisfy the treaty's make available requirement for fee for included services. The computer maintenance charges were treated as payments for access to a common global portal and were held not to involve the transfer of technology or any right amounting to royalty. As to the client-related expenses, the record did not justify treating the entire amount as taxable; only the limited items sustained by the first appellate authority were examined further. The Tribunal also accepted that, for the relevant period, the payer could not be fastened with withholding liability on the basis of a later retrospective enlargement of the charging provision.
Conclusion: The assessee was not liable to withhold tax on the impugned remittances, and the addition sustained by the first appellate authority was deleted.