TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the amount payable under the Area Services and Market Development Agreement was chargeable to tax in India under the Income-tax Act, 1961 and the India-UK tax treaty. (ii) Whether the amount receivable by the foreign service provider under the agreement constituted fees for technical services under section 9(1)(vii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Issue (i): Whether the amount payable under the Area Services and Market Development Agreement was chargeable to tax in India under the Income-tax Act, 1961 and the India-UK tax treaty.
Analysis: The services described in the agreement were examined against Article 13 of the treaty, which requires that technical or consultancy services must also make available technical knowledge, experience, skill, know-how or processes to the recipient. The services consisted mainly of centralized support, templates, strategies, guidelines, information, and coordination for member entities. On that footing, the recipient was not enabled to independently apply any technical knowledge or know-how in future without the service provider.
Conclusion: The amount was not chargeable to tax in India under the treaty as business profits or otherwise.
Issue (ii): Whether the amount receivable by the foreign service provider under the agreement constituted fees for technical services under section 9(1)(vii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The ruling applied the make available test and held that mere provision of managerial, informational, or support services does not amount to fees for technical services unless technical knowledge or skills are transferred to the recipient so that it can be used independently later. The centralized services in question did not involve such transfer of technical know-how, and the service provider had not imparted any technology of its own to the applicant.
Conclusion: The receipts did not constitute fees for technical services under section 9(1)(vii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Final Conclusion: The ruling answers both questions against the Revenue and holds that the impugned receipts are not taxable in India under the treaty or as fees for technical services, while leaving open inquiry on arm's length contribution in assessment proceedings.
Ratio Decidendi: Under the relevant treaty, technical or consultancy services are taxable only when they make available technical knowledge, experience, skill, know-how, or processes to the recipient so that the recipient can apply them independently in future; centralized support, guidance, and standardized business services do not satisfy that test.
TaxTMI 
