Commissionaire sales support and online content access were not FTS or royalty under the India-Germany treaty.

Commission under a non-exclusive commissionaire arrangement for sales support, customer liaison and product promotion was not treated as fees for technical services under the India-Germany DTAA or the Income-tax Act because such ordinary procurement and support functions do not constitute managerial, technical or consultancy services; the related addition was deleted. Subscription receipts for access to online books and journals were also not treated as royalty because the payments covered access to copyrighted content, not transfer or use of copyright or other protected rights; the related addition was deleted. The interest and penalty grounds consequently did not survive.

---

---

Issues: (i) whether commission received under the commissionaire arrangement was taxable as fees for technical services under Article 12 of the India-Germany DTAA and the Income-tax Act, 1961; (ii) whether subscription receipts collected from third-party customers for access to online books and journals were taxable as royalty.

Issue (i): Whether commission received under the commissionaire arrangement was taxable as fees for technical services under Article 12 of the India-Germany DTAA and the Income-tax Act, 1961.

Analysis: The arrangement was examined as one of a non-exclusive sales representative/commission agent facilitating promotion and distribution of products and rendering customer and sales support. Mere support or procurement-related services, without management of the payer's business or advisory/technical input of the kind contemplated by the treaty, do not amount to managerial, technical, or consultancy services. The earlier coordinate-bench decision on materially similar facts was followed.

Conclusion: The commission receipt was not taxable as fees for technical services; the addition was deleted in favour of the assessee.

Issue (ii): Whether subscription receipts collected from third-party customers for access to online books and journals were taxable as royalty.

Analysis: The receipts were tested against the settled principle that royalty arises only where there is transfer or use of copyright or other rights in a copyrighted work, or a payment for use of a process or similar rights within the treaty and the Act. The receipts related to access to copyrighted articles and not transfer of copyright, and the Supreme Court ruling on computer software royalty was applied by analogy to reject taxation as royalty.

Conclusion: The subscription receipts were not taxable as royalty; the addition was deleted in favour of the assessee.

Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded on the substantive transfer-pricing and characterisation issues, while the consequential interest and penalty grounds did not survive.

Ratio Decidendi: Commission for ordinary sales-support functions is not fees for technical services, and consideration for mere access to copyrighted articles without transfer of copyright is not royalty.

---