Tribunal Rules in Favor of Assessee on Taxability of Offshore Receipts

The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee in a case concerning taxability of receipts from Power Grid Corporation of India Limited (PGCIL) and North Delhi Power Limited (NDPL) for offshore services and software licenses respectively. The Tribunal held that the receipts did not qualify as 'Royalty' under the India-US DTAA, and the additions were directed to be deleted. Additionally, the Tribunal clarified the charging of interest under sections 234B and 234C of the Income Tax Act, following the decision in Mitsubishi India Ltd. The appeals by the assessee were allowed, with the final judgment pronounced on 24.11.2021.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Taxability of receipts from Power Grid Corporation of India Limited (PGCIL) for offshore maintenance and support services.
2. Taxability of receipts from North Delhi Power Limited (NDPL) for offshore supply of software licenses.
3. Charging of interest under sections 234B and 234C of the Income Tax Act.

Detailed Analysis:

Issue 1: Taxability of Receipts from PGCIL
- Facts and Agreement: The assessee entered into an agreement with PGCIL on 29.12.2006 to provide offshore maintenance and support services, including remote troubleshooting and incidental spare parts supply for EMS and SCADA systems. All services were performed from outside India.
- Assessing Officer's Stand: The services were taxable as Fees for Included Services (FIS) under section 9(1)(vii) of the Income Tax Act and/or Article 12 of the Tax Treaty.
- Assessee's Contention: The assessee opted to be governed by the more beneficial provisions of the tax treaty, rendering section 9(1)(vii) inapplicable.
- Tribunal's Finding: The Tribunal agreed with the assessee, stating that the tax treaty's provisions are more beneficial, thus section 9(1)(vii) does not apply. The services did not make available any technical knowledge, experience, skills, know-how, or processes to PGCIL, as required by Article 12(4)(a) of the Indo-US DTAA. The services were repetitive and ongoing, indicating that PGCIL could not independently apply the technical skills.
- Conclusion: The receipts from PGCIL do not qualify as ‘Royalty’ under Article 12(4)(a) and 12(4)(b) of the India-US DTAA. The addition was directed to be deleted.

Issue 2: Taxability of Receipts from NDPL
- Facts and Agreement: The NDPL contract was divided into two purchase orders: one for software licenses and another for offshore services. For Assessment Year 2010-11, the assessee received consideration under both orders.
- Tribunal's Analysis: No copyright was transferred to NDPL; only the right to use the software was granted. The Supreme Court in Engineering Analysis Centre of Excellence Pvt Ltd ruled that payments for software licenses do not constitute ‘Royalty’. Consequently, the payments for services connected with such software do not qualify as FIS under Article 12(4)(a) of the India-US DTAA.
- Conclusion: The consideration for services related to software supply does not qualify as FIS under Article 12(4)(a) or 12(4)(b) of the India-US DTAA. The addition was directed to be deleted.

Issue 3: Charging of Interest under Sections 234B and 234C
- Tribunal's Decision: The Supreme Court in Mitsubishi India Ltd held that prior to Assessment Year 2013-14, no interest is to be charged under section 234B. Charging of interest under section 234C is consequential.
- Conclusion: The Assessing Officer was directed to charge interest as per the provisions of the law.

Final Judgment: The appeals filed by the assessee were allowed, and the order was pronounced in the open court on 24.11.2021.

---