Withholding tax limits on reimbursements, royalty, and technical services turn on chargeability and the make available test.

Reimbursements to non-residents are described as outside withholding where they are mere pass-through expenses and not income chargeable to tax in India. Aircraft charter and related sponsorship or ground-rights payments are distinguished from royalty because they do not involve use of equipment or immovable property in the statutory sense. Consultancy, survey, maintenance, crew support, and security services are analysed under the Act and the relevant DTAAs, with treaty taxation depending on the make available condition; without transfer of usable skill or knowledge, the services are not fees for technical services. Amounts treated as security deposits are presented as non-expenditure and, when returned, do not attract withholding.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether reimbursement of expenses paid to non-residents was chargeable to tax in India and required deduction of tax at source. (ii) Whether charter hire of aircraft and related sponsorship payments constituted royalty. (iii) Whether consultancy, survey, maintenance, crew support, and security services rendered by non-residents were fees for technical services under the Act and the relevant DTAA, including the application of the make available clause. (iv) Whether payment described as a security deposit gave rise to an expenditure requiring withholding.

Issue (i): Whether reimbursement of expenses paid to non-residents was chargeable to tax in India and required deduction of tax at source.

Analysis: The payments found to be mere reimbursements were for actual expenses incurred by the non-residents and did not represent income in their hands. Since the amounts were not chargeable to tax under the charging provisions, the machinery provision for withholding did not apply.

Conclusion: The issue was decided in favour of the assessee.

Issue (ii): Whether charter hire of aircraft and related sponsorship payments constituted royalty.

Analysis: The chartered aircraft payments were for fully equipped and crewed aircraft taken on hire and did not amount to use of industrial, commercial, or scientific equipment as royalty. The sponsorship and ground-rights payments were only for publicity and marketing rights and did not amount to use of any equipment or immovable property by the assessee so as to fall within the royalty definition.

Conclusion: The issue was decided in favour of the assessee.

Issue (iii): Whether consultancy, survey, maintenance, crew support, and security services rendered by non-residents were fees for technical services under the Act and the relevant DTAA, including the application of the make available clause.

Analysis: For the legal consultancy payment, the treaty provisions governing professional services applied and the services were taxable, if at all, only in the State of residence because the treaty conditions for Indian taxation were not satisfied. For the survey, maintenance, crew support, and security services, the non-residents rendered services without transferring skill or knowledge so as to enable the assessee to apply them independently in future. The make available requirement was not satisfied, and the payments could not be characterised as fees for technical services under the relevant DTAAs.

Conclusion: The issue was decided in favour of the assessee.

Issue (iv): Whether payment described as a security deposit gave rise to an expenditure requiring withholding.

Analysis: The amount was treated as a security deposit and not as an expenditure, and it was subsequently returned. No income element arose in the hands of the non-resident payee and withholding was not attracted.

Conclusion: The issue was decided in favour of the assessee.

Final Conclusion: The assessee's appeals succeeded and the Revenue's appeals failed, as the impugned remittances were either non-taxable reimbursements or payments not falling within royalty or fees for technical services under the Act and the applicable treaties.

Ratio Decidendi: A remittance is not subject to withholding unless it is chargeable to tax in India, and treaty-based technical services provisions cannot apply unless the non-resident's service makes available knowledge or skill so that the recipient can independently use it in future.

---