Management service charges to non-resident associates not subject to TDS under section 195 as technical services not established

The ITAT Delhi upheld CIT(A)'s decision that management service charges paid to non-resident associated enterprises were not fees for technical services and therefore not subject to TDS under section 195. The AO failed to identify specific technical services or expertise clauses in agreements, and similar decisions favored the assessee in previous years. The tribunal also sustained CIT(A)'s allowance of management charges as revenue expenditure under section 37 and deletion of PF/ESI disallowances, finding payments were made within statutory deadlines following Delhi HC precedent.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Disallowance under section 40(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 in respect of payment made for management services.
2. Disallowance of expenditure under section 37 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
3. Disallowance in respect of delayed payment of Employee's contribution to the EPF/ESI.

Detailed Analysis:

Issue 1: Disallowance under section 40(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 in respect of payment made for management services

The Revenue challenged the deletion of an addition made by the Assessing Officer (AO) amounting to Rs.2,06,29,647/- by disallowing payment made for management services under section 40(a)(i). The assessee had paid Rs.4,00,78,616/- to its group entities outside India, out of which Rs.1,94,48,969/- was paid to Intertek Testing Services Hong Kong Limited with TDS deducted. The AO argued that the payments made for management services fall under "Fees for Technical Services" (FTS) and are liable for TDS.

The assessee contended that under the India-UK and India-USA DTAA, managerial services do not qualify as FTS and thus are not subject to TDS. The CIT (Appeals) agreed with the assessee, noting that similar issues had been decided in favor of the assessee for the assessment years 2010-11 and 2014-15, and the Revenue did not appeal those decisions.

The Tribunal upheld the CIT (Appeals) decision, noting that the AO failed to reference specific clauses in the agreements that would classify the services as highly technical. The Tribunal found no valid reason to interfere with the CIT (Appeals) findings and rejected the Revenue's ground of appeal.

Issue 2: Disallowance of expenditure under section 37 of the Income Tax Act, 1961

The Revenue also challenged the deletion of the disallowance of Rs.2,06,29,647/- under section 37, arguing that the assessee had only submitted some invoices on a sample basis. The CIT (Appeals) had called for a remand report and, after considering the additional evidence, concluded that the expenses were incurred for the purpose of business and qualified as revenue expenditure.

The Tribunal found no infirmity in the CIT (Appeals) decision, noting that the expenses were routine and recurring in nature and had not been disallowed in other assessment years. The Tribunal thus rejected this ground of appeal as well.

Issue 3: Disallowance in respect of delayed payment of Employee's contribution to the EPF/ESI

The Revenue contested the deletion of an addition of Rs.1,64,839/- made by the AO for delayed payment of Employee's contribution to the EPF/ESI. The CIT (Appeals) held that the payments were made within the due date for filing the return of income under section 139 and followed the decision of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court in CIT Vs. AIMIL Ltd. [321 ITR 508].

The Tribunal agreed with the CIT (Appeals) and found no justification for the disallowance. This ground of appeal was also dismissed.

Conclusion:

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal of the Revenue, upholding the CIT (Appeals) decisions on all three issues, namely, the non-liability of TDS on management services under section 40(a)(i), the allowance of management charges as revenue expenditure under section 37, and the deletion of disallowance for delayed payment of Employee's contribution to the EPF/ESI. The order was pronounced in the open court on 29/09/2022.

---