Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the reinsurance brokerage or commission received by the assessee from Indian insurance companies was taxable as fees for technical services under section 9(1)(vii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 read with article 13(4)(c) of the India-United Kingdom Double Tax Avoidance Agreement, and whether the make available condition was satisfied.
Analysis: The assessee functioned only as an international reinsurance intermediary or facilitator. The Tribunal found that the services rendered were confined to arranging reinsurance cover and transmitting communications between the parties, and that no technical knowledge, experience, skill, know-how, process, technical plan, or technical design was made available to the Indian insurance companies. The Court held that these findings were factual and that no perversity was shown to justify interference under section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Conclusion: The receipts were not fees for technical services, the make available condition was not satisfied, and the appeal failed.