Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2013 (4) TMI 338 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Automated online advertising receipts outside Indian tax net where no permanent establishment or human-intervention-based technical service exists. Automated online advertising payments to non-resident search engine operators were treated as outside Indian tax net where no permanent establishment or ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Automated online advertising receipts outside Indian tax net where no permanent establishment or human-intervention-based technical service exists.

                          Automated online advertising payments to non-resident search engine operators were treated as outside Indian tax net where no permanent establishment or Indian business connection was shown. The receipts were not assessable as business profits under domestic deeming provisions, and the human-intervention test meant they also did not qualify as fees for technical services under the domestic law or treaty. As the sums were not chargeable to tax in India, the payer had no withholding obligation under section 195, and disallowance for non-deduction of tax under section 40(a)(i) was held unsustainable.




                          Issues: (i) Whether payments for online advertising made to non-resident search engine operators were chargeable to tax in India as business profits or deemed income in the absence of a permanent establishment; (ii) Whether such online advertising receipts constituted fees for technical services under the domestic law and the applicable treaty; (iii) Whether, in the absence of taxability in India, the payer was required to deduct tax at source under section 195 and whether disallowance under section 40(a)(i) was justified.

                          Issue (i): Whether payments for online advertising made to non-resident search engine operators were chargeable to tax in India as business profits or deemed income in the absence of a permanent establishment.

                          Analysis: The online advertising services were held to operate through an automated internet-based system with no human interface and no material to show a fixed place of business or other permanent establishment in India. On the facts, the receipts could not be brought within section 5(2)(b) as income accruing or arising in India through business carried on in India, nor could they be taxed under the deeming provisions of section 9(1)(i) when no Indian business connection was established. The website-based presence alone was held insufficient to constitute a permanent establishment.

                          Conclusion: The receipts were not chargeable to tax in India as business profits in the absence of a permanent establishment.

                          Issue (ii): Whether such online advertising receipts constituted fees for technical services under the domestic law and the applicable treaty.

                          Analysis: The expression "technical services" in section 9(1)(vii) was read with the associated words "managerial" and "consultancy" and, applying the rule of noscitur a sociis, was confined to services involving human intervention. The online advertising mechanism was found to be wholly automated, and no transfer of technical knowledge or enablement of the recipient to apply such knowledge independently was shown. The treaty definition was also not narrower in a way that could bring the receipts within taxable fees for technical services.

                          Conclusion: The receipts did not constitute fees for technical services.

                          Issue (iii): Whether, in the absence of taxability in India, the payer was required to deduct tax at source under section 195 and whether disallowance under section 40(a)(i) was justified.

                          Analysis: Tax deduction at source is attracted only where the sum paid is chargeable to tax in India. Since the underlying income of the non-residents was held not exigible to tax in India, there was no primary tax liability on the recipients and consequently no vicarious withholding obligation on the payer. The disallowance under section 40(a)(i) was therefore unsustainable.

                          Conclusion: No tax was deductible at source and the disallowance under section 40(a)(i) was not justified.

                          Final Conclusion: The appellate authority's deletion of the disallowance was upheld, and the Revenue's appeal failed.

                          Ratio Decidendi: Tax deduction at source under section 195 arises only when the payment is chargeable to tax in India, and automated online advertising receipts without a permanent establishment or human-intervention-based technical service element are not taxable as business profits or fees for technical services.


                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found