TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) whether receipts from standard and automated cloud computing services were taxable as royalty under the Income-tax Act, 1961 and Article 12(3) of the India-USA DTAA; (ii) whether such receipts were taxable as fees for included services under Article 12(4)(b) of the India-USA DTAA.
Issue (i): whether receipts from standard and automated cloud computing services were taxable as royalty under the Income-tax Act, 1961 and Article 12(3) of the India-USA DTAA.
Analysis: The assessee provided standardised cloud services through a non-exclusive, non-transferable licence to access the services. The customers did not obtain any right to use or commercially exploit copyright, trademarks, software, or any equipment, nor were any dedicated facilities or hardware placed at their disposal. The service was held to be a standard facility, with the contractual terms showing only access to services and not transfer of any right in equipment or intellectual property. The authorities and precedents relied upon by the assessee were found to support the view that mere access to cloud infrastructure without control, possession, or transfer of rights does not amount to royalty.
Conclusion: The receipts were not royalty and were not taxable in India on that basis.
Issue (ii): whether such receipts were taxable as fees for included services under Article 12(4)(b) of the India-USA DTAA.
Analysis: Article 12(4)(b) applies only where technical or consultancy services make available technical knowledge, experience, skill, know-how, or processes, or involve development and transfer of a technical plan or design. The cloud services and ancillary support were found to be standard and automated, meant only to enable customers to use the services efficiently. The support, troubleshooting, and guidance did not transmit technology or enable the customers to independently perform the service in future. The make available requirement was therefore not satisfied.
Conclusion: The receipts were not fees for included services and were not taxable in India on that basis.
Final Conclusion: The additions made on the footing that the cloud service receipts were taxable in India as royalty or fees for included services could not be sustained, and the assessee succeeded on the substantive issues decided.
Ratio Decidendi: Standard and automated cloud computing services, provided without transfer of rights in intellectual property or equipment and without making available technical knowledge or know-how, do not constitute royalty or fees for included services under the India-USA DTAA.
TaxTMI 
