Software sales and cloud access were not royalty absent copyright or equipment-use rights under the India-USA treaty.

Receipts from sale of Microsoft retail software products to Indian distributors were treated as payment for a copyrighted article, not a transfer of copyright or reproduction rights, and therefore were not royalty under section 9(1)(vi) of the Income-tax Act or Article 12(3) of the India-USA DTAA. Receipts from cloud services were likewise held outside the royalty definition because the subscriber obtained only online access to infrastructure and applications, without any right to use equipment, software copyright, or reproduction rights. On both issues, the tax additions based on royalty characterization failed, and consequential relief on TDS credit followed in accordance with law.

---

---

Issues: (i) whether receipts from sale of Microsoft retail software products to distributors in India were taxable as royalty under the Act and the India-USA DTAA; (ii) whether receipts from cloud services were taxable as royalty under the Act and the India-USA DTAA.

Issue (i): whether receipts from sale of Microsoft retail software products to distributors in India were taxable as royalty under the Act and the India-USA DTAA.

Analysis: The dispute was governed by the settled principle that sale of software products, without transfer of copyright or any right of reproduction, is only a transfer of a copyrighted article and does not constitute royalty. The Tribunal followed the binding legal position that the revenue from such sales does not fall within the royalty definition under section 9(1)(vi) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 or Article 12(3) of the India-USA DTAA.

Conclusion: The issue was decided in favour of the assessee and the software-sale receipts were held not taxable as royalty.

Issue (ii): whether receipts from cloud services were taxable as royalty under the Act and the India-USA DTAA.

Analysis: The cloud services were found to provide only online access to infrastructure and applications, without conferring any right to use equipment, software copyright, or any reproducing right on the subscriber. Applying the settled distinction between use of a service and use of underlying rights or equipment, the subscription receipts were held not to answer the statutory and treaty definition of royalty.

Conclusion: The issue was decided in favour of the assessee and the cloud-service receipts were held not taxable as royalty.

Final Conclusion: The additions made on royalty characterization could not survive, and the assessment was set aside with consequential relief on TDS credit in accordance with law.

Ratio Decidendi: Consideration received for sale of software or for cloud access is not royalty unless the payer acquires a copyright interest, a right of reproduction, or a right to use equipment or underlying infrastructure within the statutory or treaty definition.

---