SaaS access receipts were not equipment royalty or technical fees, and TDS credit required verification.

Receipts from product analytics services provided under a SaaS model were treated as neither equipment royalty nor fees for technical services or included services under the Act and the India-USA DTAA, because users only obtained a subscription-based right to access the platform without possession, control, or commercial exploitation of the underlying equipment, software, or intellectual property. The arrangement also did not involve transfer of technology or satisfy the make available test. TDS credit was to be verified and allowed, with related interest and exemption adjustments recomputed consequentially.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether receipts from product analytics services rendered under a SaaS model were taxable as equipment royalty or as fees for technical services or fees for included services under the Act and the India-USA DTAA; (ii) Whether the assessee was entitled to TDS credit and consequential recomputation of interest and exemption-related adjustments.

Issue (i): Whether receipts from product analytics services rendered under a SaaS model were taxable as equipment royalty or as fees for technical services or fees for included services under the Act and the India-USA DTAA.

Analysis: The receipts arose from access to a standard automated cloud-based platform, with the customers obtaining only a subscription-based right to use the service and not any right to possess, control, or commercially exploit the underlying equipment, software, or intellectual property. The agreement restricted reverse engineering, copying, and transfer, and the services were found to be rendered through the provider's own infrastructure without transfer of technology or enabling the customers to perform the services on their own. In view of the jurisdictional precedents relied on, the nature of the receipts did not satisfy the requirements of royalty or the make available test for FIS/FTS.

Conclusion: The receipts were not taxable as equipment royalty or as FTS/FIS, and this issue was decided in favour of the assessee.

Issue (ii): Whether the assessee was entitled to TDS credit and consequential recomputation of interest and exemption-related adjustments.

Analysis: The matter of TDS credit required verification, and the other adjustments relating to interest and exemption followed the outcome on the main taxability issue and were consequential in nature.

Conclusion: The Assessing Officer was directed to verify and allow the due TDS credit and to recompute the consequential adjustments accordingly.

Final Conclusion: The additions on account of royalty or FTS/FIS did not survive, and the appeals were allowed with directions for verification of credit and consequential recomputation.

---