Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether payments received for network access and use of software under the master service arrangement were taxable as royalty under Article 12(4) of the India-Netherlands DTAA; (ii) Whether receipts for IT support services were taxable as fees for technical services under Article 13(4)(c) of the India-Netherlands DTAA.
Issue (i): Whether payments received for network access and use of software under the master service arrangement were taxable as royalty under Article 12(4) of the India-Netherlands DTAA.
Analysis: The payment was examined in the light of the treaty definition of royalty, the limited and non-transferable access granted under the service arrangement, and the distinction between use of a copyrighted article and use of copyright. The arrangement did not confer any right to reproduce, exploit, assign, or commercially use the underlying copyright. The access was only incidental to the rendering of services, while ownership of the software and intellectual property remained with the assessee.
Conclusion: The receipts were not royalty under Article 12(4) of the India-Netherlands DTAA and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.
Issue (ii): Whether receipts for IT support services were taxable as fees for technical services under Article 13(4)(c) of the India-Netherlands DTAA.
Analysis: The services were tested on the treaty requirement that technical knowledge, experience, skill, know-how or processes must be made available to the recipient. The support services facilitated the recipient's business operations but did not equip the recipient to apply the underlying technology independently in future. The make available condition was therefore not satisfied.
Conclusion: The receipts did not constitute fees for technical services under Article 13(4)(c) of the India-Netherlands DTAA and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The additions treating the impugned receipts as royalty and fees for technical services were deleted, and both appeals were allowed.
Ratio Decidendi: Under the India-Netherlands DTAA, limited access to software for internal service use without transfer of copyright rights is not royalty, and technical support receipts are not fees for technical services unless the services make available technical knowledge or skills to the recipient.