Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Canned Software Deemed 'Goods' and Taxable Under Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957.</h1> <h3>TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES Versus STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH</h3> The SC affirmed that canned software qualifies as 'goods' under the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957, subject to sales tax. Intellectual ... Computer software - A software may be intellectual property but such personal intellectual property contained in a medium is bought and sold. It is an article of value. It is sold in various forms like - floppies, disks, CD-ROMs, punch cards, magnetic tapes, etc. Each one of the mediums in which the intellectual property is contained is a marketable commodity - The software marketed by the Appellants is canned software and, thus, would be exigible to sales tax. Issues Involved:1. Whether canned software sold by the appellants can be termed as 'goods' and assessable to sales tax under the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957.2. Interpretation of the term 'goods' under Section 2(h) of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957.3. Applicability of sales tax to intellectual property contained in physical media.4. Distinction between tangible and intangible property in the context of sales tax.Issue-Wise Detailed Analysis:1. Whether canned software sold by the appellants can be termed as 'goods' and assessable to sales tax under the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957:The Supreme Court examined whether canned software sold by the appellants qualifies as 'goods' under the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957. The Commercial Tax Officer, Hyderabad, had initially held that the software were goods and levied sales tax, a decision upheld by the Appellate Deputy Commissioner and the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal. The Andhra Pradesh High Court also dismissed the appellants' challenge.2. Interpretation of the term 'goods' under Section 2(h) of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957:Section 2(h) of the Act defines 'goods' as all kinds of movable property except actionable claims, stocks, shares, and securities, including materials, articles, and commodities. The Court noted that the term 'goods' includes both tangible and intangible properties, provided they are capable of being abstracted, consumed, used, transmitted, transferred, delivered, stored, or possessed. The definition is broad and encompasses various forms of movable property.3. Applicability of sales tax to intellectual property contained in physical media:The Court held that intellectual property, once put on a media such as books, canvases, computer discs, or cassettes, and marketed, becomes 'goods' susceptible to sales tax. The Court emphasized that the sale is not just of the media but the intellectual property embedded within it, which cannot be separated from the media. The software and the media are inseparable, and what the buyer purchases is the intellectual property.4. Distinction between tangible and intangible property in the context of sales tax:The Court rejected the argument that software is intangible and thus not subject to sales tax. It referred to several cases, including the Commissioner of Sales Tax v. Madhya Pradesh Electricity Board, where electricity was considered 'goods' despite being intangible. The Court emphasized that the test for determining whether an item is 'goods' includes its capability of abstraction, consumption, use, transmission, transfer, delivery, storage, and possession. Software, whether canned or uncanned, meets these criteria.Conclusion:The Court concluded that both branded and unbranded software, when marketed or sold, qualify as 'goods' under the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957. The software's nature as intellectual property does not exempt it from being classified as goods. The Court dismissed the appeals, affirming the decisions of the lower authorities and the Andhra Pradesh High Court. The judgment clarified that the term 'goods' includes both tangible and intangible properties capable of being abstracted, consumed, used, transmitted, transferred, delivered, stored, or possessed.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found