Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2013 (9) TMI 374 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Software licence payments treated as royalty where only restricted use was granted and copyright remained with the supplier. Software licence payments were treated as royalty where the agreements granted only restricted internal use and left ownership, copyright, and ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Software licence payments treated as royalty where only restricted use was granted and copyright remained with the supplier.

                          Software licence payments were treated as royalty where the agreements granted only restricted internal use and left ownership, copyright, and exploitation rights with the foreign supplier; the consideration was held taxable in India and subject to withholding tax. The record did not establish a fixed place, service, or agency permanent establishment in India, as there was no proof of authority to conclude contracts or other PE-creating facts, so attribution of business profits was not warranted. TDS credit was directed to be granted despite a later refund to the deductor, and interest under section 234B was not sustained, with the remaining interest objection rejected as consequential.




                          Issues: (i) whether payments made for supply of computer software under the agreements were royalty taxable in India and liable to deduction of tax at source; (ii) whether the foreign supplier had a permanent establishment in India and whether profits from software receipts were attributable to such permanent establishment; and (iii) whether credit of tax deducted at source and levy of interest were to be granted or sustained.

                          Issue (i): whether payments made for supply of computer software under the agreements were royalty taxable in India and liable to deduction of tax at source.

                          Analysis: The agreements conferred only a limited licence to use the software, while ownership, copyright, and other intellectual property rights remained with the supplier. The user was prohibited from sublicensing, decompiling, reverse engineering, modifying, or otherwise exploiting the software beyond internal use. The software was treated as a copyrighted work and the consideration was examined under the domestic royalty provision and the India-USA treaty definition of royalties. Applying the distinction between a copyright and a copyrighted article as understood in the treaty context, the software licences were held to involve consideration for the use of, or right to use, copyright in the software.

                          Conclusion: The payment for software was held to be royalty and taxable in India, and the payer was required to deduct tax at source.

                          Issue (ii): whether the foreign supplier had a permanent establishment in India and whether profits from software receipts were attributable to such permanent establishment.

                          Analysis: The record did not show that the foreign supplier had a fixed place, service, or agency establishment in India for the relevant years. The Indian group entity acted under separate contractual arrangements and the material on record did not establish authority to conclude contracts on behalf of the foreign supplier or other facts necessary to constitute a permanent establishment. Since the receipts were already held taxable as royalty, attribution of business profits did not arise on those receipts.

                          Conclusion: No permanent establishment was held to exist in India, and attribution of business profits was not warranted.

                          Issue (iii): whether credit of tax deducted at source and levy of interest were to be granted or sustained.

                          Analysis: Credit could not be denied merely because the deductor later obtained a refund, since valid deduction certificates had been issued and the statutory entitlement of the recipient was unaffected. As to interest, the finding on tax deduction and the admitted deduction of tax on payment supported relief on the relevant interest issue, while consequential and pre-mature objections were not entertained.

                          Conclusion: TDS credit was directed to be granted, interest under section 234B was not sustained, and the remaining interest-related challenge was rejected as consequential.

                          Final Conclusion: The Revenue's appeals succeeded on the royalty and withholding-tax issue, while the assessee's appeals succeeded only in part on the PE and TDS-credit questions, resulting in a mixed disposition with the software receipts being treated as taxable royalty and no permanent establishment found in India.

                          Ratio Decidendi: Where a software licence permits only restricted use of software while the copyright and all substantial exploitation rights remain with the supplier, the consideration is for the use of copyright in the software and is taxable as royalty under the applicable treaty and domestic law.


                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found