Tribunal Rectifies Order on Taxability of Software Rights, Allows Assessee's Applications for Fair Hearing

The Tribunal acknowledged errors in its initial order regarding the taxability of consideration received for facilitating user rights in off-the-shelf software. It recognized the misreading of relevant judicial decisions and rectified the order by recalling it and listing the appeals for a fresh hearing. The Miscellaneous Applications filed by the assessee were allowed, ensuring a fair opportunity for the assessee to contest the appeals on merits.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Taxability of consideration received for facilitating user rights in off-the-shelf software.
2. Rectification of the Tribunal's order due to alleged misreading and non-consideration of relevant judicial decisions.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Taxability of Consideration Received for Facilitating User Rights in Off-the-Shelf Software:
The assessee contested the taxability of the consideration received for facilitating user rights in off-the-shelf software from Cummins India Ltd. and Cummins Diesel Sales & Services (India) Ltd. The Tribunal initially adjudicated this issue by following the decision of the Karnataka High Court in Commissioner of Income Tax & Ors. Vs. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. & Anr., which was in favor of the Revenue. The assessee argued that the Tribunal misread the decision of the Delhi High Court in Director of Income Tax Vs. Ericsson A.B. and did not consider the decision of the Co-ordinate Bench in Allianz SE Vs. Asstt. Director of Income Tax. The Tribunal was reminded that in cases of conflicting views, the view favorable to the assessee should be adopted.

2. Rectification of the Tribunal's Order Due to Alleged Misreading and Non-Consideration of Relevant Judicial Decisions:
The assessee filed Miscellaneous Applications under section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, seeking rectification of the Tribunal's order dated 08-08-2013. The assessee highlighted that the Tribunal overlooked the decision in Allianz SE Vs. Asstt. Director of Income Tax and misread the decision in Director of Income Tax Vs. Ericsson A.B. The Department opposed the application, arguing that the facts in the assessee's case were distinguishable from those in Allianz SE Vs. Asstt. Director of Income Tax. The Tribunal, upon reviewing the submissions and various judicial decisions, concluded that the failure to consider the Co-ordinate Bench's decision and the misreading of the Delhi High Court's decision constituted a mistake apparent from the record.

The Tribunal referred to a similar situation in the case of Reliance Communications Ltd., where the Mumbai Bench of the Tribunal accepted the Miscellaneous Applications and recalled its earlier order due to non-consideration of a relevant decision. This approach was subsequently upheld by the Bombay High Court, which emphasized that the Tribunal's jurisdiction to rectify mistakes under section 254(2) was valid and necessary for ensuring justice.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal acknowledged the mistake in its initial order by not considering the decision in Allianz SE Vs. Asstt. Director of Income Tax and misreading the decision in Director of Income Tax Vs. Ericsson A.B. Consequently, the Tribunal recalled its order dated 08-08-2013 and directed the office Registry to list the appeals for a fresh hearing. The Miscellaneous Applications filed by the assessee were allowed, ensuring that the assessee would be granted a fair opportunity to contest the appeals on merits.

Order Pronounced:
The order was pronounced on Wednesday, the 06th day of December, 2017.

---