Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Assessing Officer was justified in rejecting the petitioner's application for a Nil Withholding Certificate under Section 197 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and issuing a certificate directing deduction of tax at source at 15% instead.
Analysis: The determinative statutory procedure for deciding applications under Section 197 is prescribed by Rule 28AA of the Income-tax Rules, 1962, which mandates consideration of specified factors including tax payable on estimated income for the relevant year, tax payable on assessed/returned/estimated income for the last four previous years, existing tax liabilities, and advance tax payments. The impugned order does not record whether these mandatory factors were actually considered. Prior determinations by the Tribunal for earlier assessment years favouring the petitioner remain binding unless set aside; the mere filing of appeals by Revenue does not render those orders inoperative for the purpose of Section 197 proceedings. Where the assessing officer fails to apply Rule 28AA's mandatory considerations, the decision-making process is vitiated and amenable to quashing, while leaving open the necessity for a fresh decision in accordance with law.
Conclusion: The impugned order and certificate are quashed for failure to comply with the mandatory decision-making requirements of Rule 28AA. The matter is remitted to the Assessing Officer to consider the petitioner's application afresh in accordance with Rule 28AA and without being influenced by pending appeals, to be concluded within four weeks of receipt of this order.