Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the payment made to the non-resident for third-party certification of oil and gas reserves was chargeable as fees for technical services or fees for included services, so as to require deduction of tax at source.
Analysis: The payment related to reserve certification services rendered outside India. The Tribunal followed its earlier decisions in the assessee's own cases and held that the services did not make available any technical knowledge, experience, skill, know-how or processes to the assessee. In the absence of such make-available element, the payment could not be treated as fees for included services under Article 12 of the India-USA DTAA. Once the DTAA did not permit taxation on that basis, the receipt could not be brought to tax as business profits in India in the absence of a permanent establishment. The alternative contention regarding section 44BB was not examined after the principal issue was decided for the assessee.
Conclusion: The payment was not taxable in India as fees for technical services or fees for included services, and the assessee was not liable to deduct tax at source on the amount remitted to the non-resident.
Ratio Decidendi: Technical services are taxable as fees for included services under the India-USA DTAA only when the service recipient is made able to apply the technical knowledge, skill, know-how or processes independently; absent that make-available element, the payment is not taxable on that basis.