Judicial appointments reform replacing the Chief Justice's primacy with a commission was struck down as unconstitutional. The amendment substituted the words 'the Chief Justice of India' with 'the National Judicial Appointments Commission' in Article 128; it came into force on 13 April 2015 and was later declared unconstitutional, nullifying the Commission-based replacement of the Chief Justice's consultative role.
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Judicial appointments reform replacing the Chief Justice's primacy with a commission was struck down as unconstitutional.
The amendment substituted the words "the Chief Justice of India" with "the National Judicial Appointments Commission" in Article 128; it came into force on 13 April 2015 and was later declared unconstitutional, nullifying the Commission-based replacement of the Chief Justice's consultative role.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.