Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Acts & Rules
of of All Acts & Rules
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Supreme Court Strikes Down NJAC Amendment, Preserves Judicial Independence in Appointment Process Under Article 217</h1> The 99th Constitutional Amendment Act, 2014 sought to modify Article 217(1) by replacing the consultation process for High Court judicial appointments with a recommendation system through the National Judicial Appointments Commission (NJAC) referenced in Article 124-A. The amendment came into force on April 13, 2015, but was subsequently declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court in Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association v. Union of India (2015).
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
