Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, in an appeal against acquittal, the appellate court may review the entire evidence and reach its own conclusion while giving due weight to the trial court's view; and whether the conviction of the appellant on the evidence adduced was liable to be interfered with.
Analysis: An appellate court hearing an appeal against acquittal has full power to reappraise the evidence and arrive at its own conclusion, but it must keep in view that the presumption of innocence continues and is reinforced by the acquittal. Due weight must be given to the trial court's advantage in seeing the witnesses, yet a contrary conclusion is permissible where the appellate court, on a proper review of the evidence, finds the trial court's approach unsound. On the facts, the High Court had carefully examined the evidence and rightly corrected the trial court's misreading of the testimony, and the surrounding circumstances supported the finding that the appellant was responsible for the murder.
Conclusion: The appellant's challenge to the High Court's reversal of acquittal failed, and the conviction was upheld.
Ratio Decidendi: In an appeal against acquittal, the appellate court may independently reassess the whole evidence and reverse the acquittal if, on a proper and cautious review, it reaches a different conclusion despite the reinforced presumption of innocence.