Judicial review restored by omitting provisions that limited review and imposed mandatory bench size and special majority barriers. The proposal omits constitutional provisions that limited courts' power to review laws and imposed mandatory bench sizes and special-majority invalidation rules, arguing these produced multiplicity of proceedings and inefficient use of judicial time; it provides for consequential amendments and for treating pending cases as if the provisions had been omitted from their commencement. The proposal also omits the special parliamentary power to legislate on anti-national activities as unduly sweeping and potentially abusive, with corresponding textual adjustments.
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Judicial review restored by omitting provisions that limited review and imposed mandatory bench size and special majority barriers.
The proposal omits constitutional provisions that limited courts' power to review laws and imposed mandatory bench sizes and special-majority invalidation rules, arguing these produced multiplicity of proceedings and inefficient use of judicial time; it provides for consequential amendments and for treating pending cases as if the provisions had been omitted from their commencement. The proposal also omits the special parliamentary power to legislate on anti-national activities as unduly sweeping and potentially abusive, with corresponding textual adjustments.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
