Advanced Search Options : ❯
Arrest safeguards require recorded and furnished grounds of arrest and actual intimation of arrest to a friend or relative; merely informing an accused of a right to communicate does not establish compliance. The text states that failure to meet these requirements rendered the arrest, detention and remand illegal. It further notes that where proceedings already concern the same alleged offence under the CGST Act, described as a complete code, subsequent police implication under the B.N.S.S. is not justified. Inter-State transfer from custody also requires production before the appropriate local Magistrate and transit remand; absence of transit remand is identified as an additional illegality.
Absence of a Document Identification Number in a GST assessment order is described as an inherent defect that invalidates the order. The text notes that portal upload is a statutory mode of service, and a registered person's ignorance of or inability to access the portal ordinarily does not justify delay. However, it states that delayed writ challenges to assessment orders with patent irregularities may be entertained on deposit of 20% of the disputed tax, balancing taxpayer hardship and tax administration. The assessment was set aside and remanded for fresh adjudication after hearing, with all issues left open, subject to that deposit.
Redemption premium on foreign currency convertible bonds issued to raise and use business funds is characterised as revenue expenditure, because the liability arises on issuance and does not acquire a capital asset or enduring advantage. The notes state that expenditure connected with issuing debentures or obtaining loans is likewise revenue in nature. The premium liability arises in the year of issue and may be proportionately spread over the bonds' prescribed maturity period; it is immaterial whether redemption is at will or only at maturity. The text further records that no substantial question of law arose on either the revenue character or timing of the deduction.
Pre-commencement receipts from broadband-project trial runs and scrap sales, when inextricably connected with installation of the capital asset, are treated as capital in nature. They are credited to capital work-in-progress and reduce construction cost rather than being taxed as income. For the infrastructure undertaking deduction, an eligible taxpayer may select an initial assessment year within the statutory claim period. The deduction then runs for the prescribed consecutive years from that chosen year, subject to statutory conditions, without setting off unabsorbed depreciation relating to years before the selected initial year.
Section 276CC contains a statutory exception to prosecution for failure to furnish an income-tax return where tax payable on regular assessment, after reducing advance tax and tax deducted at source, does not exceed the prescribed threshold. The notes state that an accepted return showing a refund entitlement after TDS credit indicates no revenue loss and may bring the taxpayer within that exception. They further note that failure by the sanctioning authority to consider TDS can render prosecution unwarranted and an abuse of process, supporting quashing of the complaint.
Higher-rate depreciation on a windmill turns on whether it was commissioned and exported electricity before the relevant date. The notes state that a commissioning certificate, grid-interconnection evidence, electricity-generation report and contemporaneous readiness letter supported commissioning in September 2004. They contrast this material with reliance on missing transport and insurance documents, characterising the latter approach as ignoring relevant evidence. The reported conclusion is that the windmill qualified for depreciation at the higher rate, with the appellate authority's position restored.
Under the mercantile system of accounting, notional interest on outstanding advances was not justified where evidence showed that no interest had been received for two preceding years and the debtor concerns' financial condition had deteriorated. One concern had ceased business activity, as indicated by cancellation of its sales tax registration and application to cancel excise registration, while material concerning the other concern was not properly considered. Family relationships with the assessee's partners alone did not support imputing interest. The article records that the High Court treated the contrary findings as perverse and deleted the notional-interest addition.
Under the India-Netherlands DTAA, executive search services that are separate from a licensing arrangement and do not make available technical knowledge, skill, know-how or processes are addressed as neither fees for technical services nor royalty. The note also distinguishes managerial services from treaty-defined technical services, while requiring examination of the specific services under a shared-services agreement. Reimbursements of actual expenses without a profit element are treated separately from fees for technical services. Interest on income-tax refunds is subject to the treaty interest provision, and tax on treaty-covered income cannot exceed the treaty-prescribed rate, including through surcharge and cess. Tax deducted at source credit remains subject to factual verification.
For a kachha arhtia, tax-audit turnover comprises only commission earned and excludes sale proceeds of goods belonging to principals. Where the accepted commission income remains below the prescribed limit, no tax-audit obligation arises. The notes also state that a penalty for failure to obtain audit cannot apply where the Revenue's position is that no books of account were maintained, because audit presupposes existing books. On the separate obligation to maintain books, the statutory conditions under section 44AA must be examined with reference to the preceding three previous years after allowing the taxpayer to explain the relevant facts. The books-maintenance penalty was remanded for fresh examination, while the tax-audit penalty was deleted.
Foreign exhibition-sale income already assessed under the Income-tax Act through a final Settlement Commission order is excluded from undisclosed foreign income under the Black Money Act, 2015. Section 4(2) excludes foreign-source income variations made in assessment or reassessment under business-income provisions, while Sections 4(2) and 4(3) prevent the same income from being taxed again. Settlement proceedings culminating in a final order are described as a statutory mode of assessment; accordingly, foreign sales considered and taxed as business profits in those proceedings cannot be reassessed under the 2015 Act, as that would produce impermissible double taxation.
Outright software purchase consideration is described as business income rather than royalty where the transaction amounts to sale of a product. The note states that, because the Malaysian enterprise had no permanent establishment in India, such income was not taxable in India under Article 7 of the India-Malaysia DTAA and no withholding obligation arose under section 195. A separate payment for intellectual property rights is treated as subject to tax deduction at the applicable treaty rate. It further records that the payer was not treated as an assessee in default and that interest for non-deduction was not leviable.
Interest credited under a partnership deed may be allowable when calculated on daily running credit balances, even if opening and closing capital-account balances are debit balances and the credit is recorded through year-end journal entries under the mercantile system. The notes state that detailed account workings, contractual authorisation, recipient income recognition and tax deduction at source negate allegations of fictitious expenditure or income diversion; the related disallowance was deleted. Interest expenditure credited to a lender is also described as not disallowable where Form 16A evidences tax deduction and the recipient has recognised and returned the income; banking-channel payment is not stated to be required for accrued interest. The appeal was partly allowed.
Expenditure incurred to implement a contractual closure of a business undertaking is not deductible under section 37(1), as that provision requires expenditure wholly and exclusively incurred for carrying on business rather than bringing an undertaking to an end. Common management of the closed and continuing divisions does not satisfy this requirement; the closure-payment disallowance was therefore restored. Foreign exchange fluctuation on imports must be determined from actual liabilities under individual transactions where book figures are available. As the fluctuation on capital goods had been capitalised and the claimed loss related to spares and consumables, with no contrary Revenue evidence, the estimated disallowance was unsustainable and its deletion was upheld.
Pharmaceutical sales-promotion expenditure is disallowable only where it directly provides prohibited benefits, such as travel or hotel facilities, to medical practitioners; patient education, professional events and other non-prohibited promotional costs remain deductible. A retracted search statement without independent corroboration cannot support an over-invoicing addition. Manufacturing scrap and empty-container sales qualify for profit-linked deductions, while the industrial excise-refund incentive described is a capital receipt excluded from taxable income and book profit. Transfer-pricing analysis requires reliable functional, temporal and economic comparability; unsupported adjustments for domestic transactions, export pricing, gua.....
Interest on inter-corporate deposits was treated as accrued because no new evidence rebutted the appellate finding. Disallowance relating to investment in a limited liability partnership under section 14A and rule 8D was likewise sustained for lack of contrary material. The genuineness of loans alleged to be connected with bank-related kickbacks requires verification of the final Special CBI Court proceedings and their effect on the transactions; that issue was remanded without a merits finding. Capital losses on unquoted-share sales were accepted where valuation followed the book value method under rule 11UA read with section 50CA, no specific defect in the valuer's report was identified, and no registered-valuer reference was made.
Independent corroboration and a direct nexus with the assessee are presented as essential before search statements, loose papers or third-party records can support additions. The material discusses acceptance of documented consultancy expenditure where agreements, invoices, banking payments and tax deduction support services, while retracted statements and uncorroborated papers do not establish non-genuine expenditure. It also addresses alleged unaccounted sales, cash salaries, land on-money, unexplained money, and liaisoning or gift expenditure. For unexplained expenditure, actual incurrence must be proved before examining its source; estimates, ambiguous loose sheets, and uninvestigated retractions are insufficient. Third-party parallel r.....
Business expenditure, statutory liabilities and depreciation are addressed through principles governing scrap credits, CENVAT adjustments, actual payment and business use of assets. Scrap credits passed to a job-work customer are treated as an ascertained commercial liability where customer ownership, quantification and payment are evidenced. Only CENVAT credit attributable to capital assets reduces depreciable cost; tools, spares and stores treated as revenue items do not form part of the depreciable block. Statutory excise duty and crystallised performance incentives are allowable on qualifying actual payment. Depreciation requires evidence that assets were actually put to business use. Ad hoc expense disallowances require identified defects or cogent adverse material, and TDS-receipt differences require proof of unaccounted income.
Bad-debt deduction for share-broking client dues may be claimed where outstanding client balances are treated as irrecoverable and written off in the accounts. Under amended section 36(1)(vii), actual irrecoverability need not be established. Continuing transactions or payments by clients do not preclude the claim where the broker follows a consistent settlement pattern under which clients pay agreed amounts and residual balances are written off. Client receivables qualify as debts when brokerage included in those receivables has been taken into account in computing income. The disallowance of the written-off client dues was deleted and the deduction sustained.
Show cause notice limits were central to the Tribunal's analysis of penalties for alleged courier-based gold smuggling. The notice addressed the seized consignment while verification of earlier consignments remained pending, but the adjudicating authority relied on earlier X-ray-screened, cleared and delivered consignments. The discussion notes that no investigation verified key particulars of the supplier, courier account, goods or related documents, and that no basis supported an alleged collusive agreement. It also addresses the medical report and affidavit in assessing whether statements were voluntary and admissible, noting that the statements related to past imports rather than the seized gold. The penalties were set aside with consequential relief.
Customs confiscation requires the alleged import contravention to be specifically identified and established. The material highlights that departmental communication must provide adequate notice of the basis for confiscation and an opportunity for personal hearing before redemption fine or penalty is imposed. Where no improper import or mala fide conduct is established, imported mobile handsets proposed for re-export should not attract confiscation or consequential redemption fine and penalty. The discussion therefore focuses on procedural fairness and evidentiary support as prerequisites for customs enforcement action.