<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
    <channel>
        <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed?type=Global+Search" rel="self" type="text/xml" />
        <title>Tax Updates - Daily Update</title>
        <link>https://www.taxtmi.com</link>
        <description>One stop solution for Direct Taxes and Indirect Taxes and Corporate Laws in India</description>
        <category>Business/Tax/Law/GST/India/Taxation/Policies/Legal/Corporate Tax/Personal Tax/Vat Law/Legal Information/Tax Information/Legal Services/Tax Services</category>
        <copyright>TaxTMI.Com / MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved.</copyright>
        <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
        <language>en-us</language>
        <webMaster>webmaster@taxtmi.com</webMaster>
        <managingEditor>editor@taxtmi.com</managingEditor>
        <ttl>60</ttl>
        <item>
<title>Allocation of quantity 5,841 MT of Sugar by EU for export from India under TRQ for the year 2026-27 (October 2026 to September 2027)</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/circulars?id=71552</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/circulars?id=71552</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Tariff-rate-quota sugar exports from India to the European Union are allocated up to 5,841 MT for October 2026-September 2027, while the allocation also identifies an earlier quota period. Exports remain free subject to applicable restrictions. Where required for preferential treatment, Certificates of Origin depend on recommendations concerning the eligible entity and quantity. APEDA operates the quota, while other European Union-specific certification and prescribed reporting requirements continue to apply.]]></description>
<category>Customs</category>
<category>Circulars</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Amendment to Para 4.49 of FTP-2023</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/notifications?id=147249</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/notifications?id=147249</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Paragraph 4.49 of the Foreign Trade Policy 2023 permits eligible foreign entities to import rough diamonds into a Special Notified Zone and undertake auction, sale and re-export on a consignment or outright basis. Eligible entities include foreign diamond-mining companies, their sightholders, and specified brokers, aggregators, tender entities and auction entities connected with rough-diamond sales, subject to applicable conditions. Activities remain under Customs supervision, while procedures for import, auction, sale and re-export of unsold rough diamonds are governed by specifications issued from time to time.]]></description>
<category>Customs</category>
<category>Notifications</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Non-availability of RoDTEP benefits in respect of exports made under DutyFree Import Authorization (DFIA) Scheme</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/circulars?id=71545</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/circulars?id=71545</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[RoDTEP rebate is unavailable for exports made under the Duty-Free Import Authorization Scheme, notwithstanding the extension of eligibility to certain Advance Authorization holders, Export Oriented Units and Special Economic Zone units. Exporters must not claim or avail RoDTEP benefits on DFIA exports. Inadmissible benefits already availed must be repaid or reversed with applicable interest, and payment particulars must be furnished to the Drawback section within 30 days. Non-compliance may trigger customs recovery proceedings.]]></description>
<category>Customs</category>
<category>Circulars</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>15th Meeting of ASEAN-India Trade in Goods Agreement (AITIGA) Joint Committee held during 6-9 October 2026</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=75067</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=75067</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[The AITIGA Joint Committee directed its sub-committees to accelerate pending review chapters through firm, time-bound deliverables and close coordination. Work covers legal and institutional issues, national treatment and market access, and rules of origin. ASEAN and India reaffirmed their commitment to resolve outstanding policy issues, deepen economic integration, and modernise the Agreement into a balanced and mutually beneficial framework strengthening bilateral trade.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>News</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Commerce Secretary Shri Rajesh Agrawal Highlights Need for Rigorous Legal Thinking at CTIL’s 9th Anniversary Celebration</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=75066</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=75066</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[International trade and investment law are increasingly shaped by sustainability-linked trade measures and digital trade and require rigorous legal analysis. CTIL supports trade capacity through legal analysis for free trade agreement negotiations, WTO processes, dispute settlement and institutional knowledge-building. International investment law increasingly recognises States' regulatory authority alongside investment protection, with institutionalisation, legitimacy and the balance between investment and public power identified as central concerns. Research and capacity-building also address climate, sustainability, supply chains, artificial intelligence and other emerging trade-policy areas.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>News</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Is GST under RCM applicable on Borrowing Cost?.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17549</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17549</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[GST reverse charge mechanism liability on borrowing-related expenditure requires identification of the underlying supply and verification that reverse charge applies in the particular facts. Borrowing costs may comprise bank processing charges already subjected to GST, loan prepayment charges, and fees connected with deposit-of-title-deeds documentation. Tax-inclusive booking of expenses, including unclaimed eligible input tax credit, must be distinguished from a taxable reverse-charge transaction; the tax base and nature of each debit require verification.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Articles</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/article_17549.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/article_17549.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Submission of Documents for finalization of Project Imports registered with Chennai Customs House</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/circulars?id=71547</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/circulars?id=71547</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Project-import contract finalisation requires importers to submit a complete statement of imported goods with a Chartered Engineer Certificate, installation certificate, reconciliation statement and other required records within three months of clearance of the last consignment, subject to permitted extension. Non-compliance may result in enforcement of bonds, cash security or bank guarantees, duty-demand proceedings and penalties. Provisionally assessed bills of entry covered by the amended framework must be finalised before 29 March 2027.]]></description>
<category>Customs</category>
<category>Circulars</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Release of Draft Guideline for Compilation Gross State Domestic Product (GSDP) Estimates by Expenditure Approach with Base Year 2022-23</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=75065</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=75065</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Draft guidelines establish a uniform framework for compiling expenditure-side Gross State Domestic Product estimates using base year 2022-23. They cover data sources, estimation procedures and methodologies for private and government consumption, gross fixed capital formation, inventory changes, valuables and net exports. State-specific data and allocation indicators are preferred, while recommended allocation methods support consistent estimates where direct subnational data are unavailable. The approach is intended to harmonise estimation practices and strengthen subnational national accounts capacity.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>News</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Implementation of ICES Advisory No. 37/2026 and ICES Advisory No. 38/2026 regarding amendment of CSN (SCA), SAM (SAA) and related SCMTR messages</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/circulars?id=71548</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/circulars?id=71548</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Accepted CSNs cannot be directly edited and permissible changes must be made through SCA; where a related SAM exists, corresponding changes must be made through SAA. Conveyance Reference and Rotation Number cannot be amended through SCA. Post-Sea Entry Inwards amendments require jurisdictional officer approval before system reflection. Structural changes involving conversion between Straight and Consolidated Bills of Lading, Consolidator PAN, or specified prior references require deletion and re-addition through SAA. Stakeholders must ensure accurate, timely and correctly linked declarations and seek amendments at the earliest stage.]]></description>
<category>Customs</category>
<category>Circulars</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Advisory on Process of amending CSN(SCA)/SAM(SAA)</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/circulars?id=71549</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/circulars?id=71549</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[SAM amendment processing depends on whether Sea Entry Inwards has been granted and requires a pre-existing CSN. Before SEI, CSN amendments and direct SAM amendments generally take effect without officer approval, although a CSN amendment after SAM filing must be followed by a corresponding SAA. After SEI, CSN-level changes require a CSN amendment and linked SAA, while direct SAM-level changes require SAA; both take effect only upon jurisdictional Customs officer approval. CSN and SAM data must match to prevent validation errors.]]></description>
<category>Customs</category>
<category>Circulars</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Enhanced Rate of Tax u/s 115BBE: Survey Surrenders of Excess Stock and Cash: Business Income, Deemed Income</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/tmi_notes?id=2547</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/tmi_notes?id=2547</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[The special regime in Section 115BBE is consequential: it applies only after the amount is properly brought within a specified deeming provision, and a survey surrender, book entry or return description cannot itself create that character. Mixed stock forming part of ordinary business inventory and credibly explained through business records may be assessed as business income at normal rates. Similarly, excess cash may be treated as business income where a commercial source is satisfactorily established and no separate or non-business source is shown.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Notes</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/note_2547.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/note_2547.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Income-tax (Sixth Amendment) Rules, 2026 - Application seeking immunity from imposition or waiver of penalty</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/notifications?id=147231</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/notifications?id=147231</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Form No. 161 is substituted as the prescribed application for waiver of penalty under section 440(2). It requires applicant and assessment-order particulars, details of assessed and under-reported income, tax and interest payable, additional income-tax payable in lieu of penalty, and payment challan details. The applicant must verify the information, declare that no appeal has been filed, and undertake not to file an appeal before expiry of the prescribed period. The total amount payable for waiver is to be paid by the demand-payment due date.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Notifications</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Dabhol Port customs designation now covers LNG, power-project cargo, shipyard imports, repairs and exports at the designated port.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104799</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104799</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Dabhol Port's specified customs purposes are substituted to permit unloading of machinery and equipment for the Ratnagiri Gas and Power project, liquefied natural gas, naphtha, and goods for shipbuilding and repair. The revised entry also covers loading for export of imported project machinery and equipment, import of ships, barges, similar vessels and rigs for repair, and their export by the specified shipyard. These changes expand and define the authorised customs activities at Dabhol Port for power-project cargo, energy imports, and shipyard-related operations.]]></description>
<category>Customs</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104799.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104799.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Verifiable consent and data audit obligations are clarified through targeted textual corrections to the Digital Personal Data Protection Act.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104798</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104798</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[The Digital Personal Data Protection (Removal of Difficulties) Order, 2026 corrects the child and disability consent provision to require verifiable consent before processing personal data of a child or of a person with disability who has a lawful guardian. It also replaces "audit" with "data audit" in the periodic-audit obligation applicable to Significant Data Fiduciaries, aligning that obligation with the requirement to appoint an independent data auditor. These textual corrections apply from 6 October 2026, the date of Gazette publication.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104798.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104798.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Compulsory registration for smartphone screen protectors begins after conformity with the prescribed Indian Standard becomes mandatory.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104797</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104797</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Screen Protectors for smartphones are added to the Schedule of the Electronics and Information Technology Goods (Requirement for Compulsory Registration) Order, 2021. They must conform to Indian Standard IS 19348:2025, Glass Screen Protector - Specification, under the compulsory registration framework from 1 April 2027. Customs field formations must take the amendment into account for necessary implementation action.]]></description>
<category>Customs</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104797.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104797.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>ISIN maturity caps for privately placed debt expand, with separate limits, legacy grandfathering, and exclusions for specified instruments.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104796</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104796</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[SEBI has revised ISIN limits for privately placed debt securities with immediate effect. Issuers may have up to seventeen ISINs maturing in a financial year, plus six additional ISINs for eligible capital gains tax debt securities. Of the seventeen, up to twelve may be plain vanilla debt securities, with additional ISINs permitted for prescribed incremental issuances after outstanding maturities exceed the specified threshold; up to five may cover structured, market-linked, floating-rate, zero-coupon and Tier II debt instruments. Legacy ISINs in the latter category are grandfathered subject to restrictions on further issuances. GoI-serviced/EBR bonds and ESG debt securities are excluded from ISIN-limit calculations.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104796.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104796.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Credit Risk-o-Meter disclosure becomes mandatory across debt-security offer materials, advertisements, and bond platforms using colour-coded ratings.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104795</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104795</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Credit Risk-o-Meter disclosure becomes mandatory for listed and proposed issuances of non-convertible securities, commercial paper, securitised debt instruments, security receipts, and structured or market-linked debentures. Issuers and online bond platform providers must display the colour-coded meter in offer materials, private placement memoranda, advertisements, and relevant web and mobile interfaces. The meter maps credit ratings to six risk levels, must show the CRA, actual rating and unsecured status, and must use the lowest rating where multiple ratings apply. OBPPs must source ratings only from registered CRAs, update changes within 24 hours of depository intimation, prohibit manual overrides, and retain audit trails. These requirements take effect 45 days after issuance.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104795.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104795.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>NLMC Invites Bids for Monetisation of 5.119-Acre Prime Freehold Land Parcel of HIL (India) Limited in New Delhi</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=75064</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=75064</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Monetisation of a 5.119-acre freehold industrial land parcel owned by HIL (India) Limited at Najafgarh Industrial Area, New Delhi, is facilitated through an E-Tender followed by E-Auction. Eligible bidders must complete registration, submit technical bids, and furnish the required Earnest Money Deposit or Bank Guarantee by the stipulated deadline. Sale is subject to "as is where is", "as is what is", "whatever there is" and no-recourse or no-complaint conditions. The exact land extent is to be determined through a joint survey with the successful bidder.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>News</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Temporary permission for supplementary filing or amendments of CSN/SCA/SAA/SAM/SDA/SDM/SCE in respect of console cargo under SCMTR</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/circulars?id=71551</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/circulars?id=71551</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Temporary supplementary filing for console cargo at Kolkata Customs is permitted from 9 October 2026 until midnight on 10 October 2026 where the requisite CSN has not been filed and cargo details must be added. The permission is confined to the stated purpose and period; it does not reinstate general supplementary filing for import cargo. Where a CSN/SAM has already been successfully filed, an amendment must follow the prescribed SCMTR amendment procedure.]]></description>
<category>Customs</category>
<category>Circulars</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Operational Advisory  Technical Clarifications: FAQs for Trade Stakeholders- Guidance on CSN, SAM, SAA Amendments, Flag Mapping,  Schema Validations</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/circulars?id=71550</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/circulars?id=71550</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[SCMTR procedures require a wrongly filed Straight Master Bill of Lading to be deleted and re-filed through a Sea Arrival Manifest Amendment. If a Cargo Summary Notification exists for House Bill details, the Master Bill must be re-filed as consolidated and linked to the relevant references; otherwise, complete House Bill particulars must be included in the houseCargoDec object. Changes to Bill reference type, consolidator PAN, or prior cargo references cannot be made in place. SAA filings must use prescribed message and amendment indicators for fresh filing, amendment, addition, deletion, and permitted updates.]]></description>
<category>Customs</category>
<category>Circulars</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Retention of Seized Mobile Phones and Bank Debit Cards Beyond the Section 67(7) Period</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/tmi_notes?id=2546</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/tmi_notes?id=2546</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Section 67(7) establishes a six-month return rule where no notice in respect of seized goods is issued. Any further period requires sufficient cause, action by the proper officer, and a maximum further period of six months; ongoing investigation cannot replace an actual extension order. Although Section 67(7) uses "goods" while Section 67(2) also covers documents, books and things, its application to seized mobile phones and bank debit cards indicates that classification cannot be used to avoid the temporal restriction where articles are held under statutory seizure.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Notes</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/note_2546.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/note_2546.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Automated allocation governs reassessment notices, while retrospective validation cannot override unamended faceless jurisdictional requirements under the statutory scheme.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104754</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104754</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Section 151A and the e-Assessment of Income Escaping Assessment Scheme, 2022 require randomised automated allocation for reassessment functions, including the section 148A process and issuance of section 148 notices. General concurrent-jurisdiction directions cannot permit a jurisdictional Assessing Officer to bypass the prescribed faceless allocation, because allocation determines the officer's statutory competence. Risk-based selection of a matter is distinct from algorithmic allocation of the officer. Section 147A's retrospective deeming rule was held unconstitutional because it did not amend the continuing statutory and scheme-based requirements for automated allocation, and therefore did not remove the legal foundation of prior jurisdictional rulings. Administrative instructions cannot override the Act or a valid notified scheme.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104754.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104754.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Doctrine of merger distinguishes refusal of special leave from appellate adjudication, preserving review and remanded proceedings where appropriate.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104753</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104753</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Doctrine of merger under Article 136 depends on whether the Supreme Court granted leave and exercised appellate jurisdiction, not merely on disposal of a special leave petition. A non-speaking refusal of leave neither merges the challenged order nor confirms its reasoning, creates automatic res judicata, or independently bars review or writ proceedings. A speaking refusal likewise does not cause merger, although legal propositions expressly declared may bind under Article 141. Merger follows when leave is granted and the appeal is decided. In remanded GST proceedings, an earlier dismissal of special leave therefore does not prevent consideration of residual grounds or reliance on a later binding ruling, subject to applicable review, limitation, and procedural requirements.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104753.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104753.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>NDPS commercial-quantity bail requires separate findings on non-guilt and future offending, with trial delay assessed within Section 37.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104752</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104752</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Section 37 of the NDPS Act imposes cumulative conditions for bail in commercial-quantity offences: after the Public Prosecutor has an opportunity to oppose, the court must record reasonable grounds that the accused is not guilty and is unlikely to commit an offence while on bail. General bail considerations and Article 21 concerns, including prolonged custody and trial delay, remain relevant but do not replace this statutory inquiry. Non-recovery, procedural objections, or exclusion of inadmissible statements cannot alone satisfy either condition; the available record requires broad assessment. For foreign nationals in commercial-quantity matters, verified sureties, passport deposit and other enforceable safeguards may be required, while technological tracking must remain proportionate.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104752.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104752.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Approved customs custodians bear duty for proven pilferage in custody, while pre-approval losses fall outside statutory liability.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104751</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104751</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Customs-duty liability for pilfered imported goods arises under Section 45(3) only where the goods were unloaded in a customs area and pilfered while in the custody of a person approved under Section 45(1). Approval is a necessary precondition, so liability does not extend to pilferage before the approval became operative. A statutory port authority may be an approved custodian, and its civil responsibilities as bailee do not displace its separate revenue liability. The importer's duty exemption for pilferage operates alongside the custodian's statutory obligation. Pilferage, rather than an unexplained cargo discrepancy or non-pilferage loss, must be established through contemporaneous custody and security records.]]></description>
<category>Customs</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104751.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104751.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Classification of Disposable Analytical Cartridges under Chapter 90 and Heading 3926</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/tmi_notes?id=2545</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/tmi_notes?id=2545</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[STA micro-cuvettes containing an enclosed steel ball are assessed as complete functional components of a blood-coagulation analyser, rather than merely as plastic laboratory articles. Classification turns on their objective design, analytical role, exclusive or principal suitability and absence of practical general use. Chapter 90 Note 2 requires consideration of an independent specific heading first and then classification of other dedicated parts or accessories with the relevant instrument. Disposable or single-use status and plastic composition do not by themselves establish classification as residual plastic articles.]]></description>
<category>Customs</category>
<category>Notes</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/note_2545.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/note_2545.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Section 5 condonation preserves delayed externment appeals where the special statute sets no express or implied outer limit.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104750</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104750</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 may apply to special-law appeals through Section 29(2) unless the governing enactment excludes it expressly or by necessary implication. A special limitation period alone is insufficient; exclusion may arise from phrases such as "but not thereafter" or "not exceeding", a defined condonable ceiling, or a self-contained scheme that selectively confers condonation. For appeals under Section 9 of the Chhattisgarh Rajya Suraksha Adhiniyam, the 30-day period and certified-copy exclusion do not bar Section 5 because no outer limit or equivalent restrictive language exists. Delay remains condonable only upon sufficient cause, while applicability before non-court statutory forums depends on the forum and enactment.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104750.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104750.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Pre-Movement E-Way Bill Compliance and Section 129 Detention for Undocumented Goods in Transit</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/tmi_notes?id=2543</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/tmi_notes?id=2543</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Pre-movement e-way bill compliance requires issuance of an invoice at or before removal, generation of the e-way bill before road movement, and carriage of both records during transit. Where goods are intercepted without either record, the contravention arises upon commencement of undocumented movement; documents generated only after interception cannot retrospectively establish compliance. Such documents may still be considered with other contemporaneous evidence when assessing bona fides or alleged intent to evade tax. Section 129 detention proceedings remain subject to notice, hearing, electronic-summary and statutory-timeline requirements.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Notes</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/note_2543.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/note_2543.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Reasoned and Speaking Appellate Orders u/s 107 of the CGST Act: Duty to Decide Material Grounds of Appeal</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/tmi_notes?id=2544</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/tmi_notes?id=2544</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Section 107(12) requires a written appellate order identifying material points for determination, deciding them, and giving reasons. Formulaic confirmation of original assessment does not establish independent appellate consideration, particularly where jurisdiction, notice, evidence, quantification, taxability, section 74 conditions, interest, or penalty are contested. Sections 74 and 75 require a defined notice, disclosure of relied-upon material, effective hearing, and reasoned determination within the notice's scope. Where procedural defects arise at the original stage as well as on appeal, reconsideration must occur at the level capable of curing the foundational defect without expanding the show-cause case.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Notes</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/note_2544.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/note_2544.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Manual show-cause replies in GST adjudication require consideration; orders issued before permitted evidence deadlines breach natural justice.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104749</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104749</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Natural justice in GST adjudication requires the Proper Officer to consider a taxpayer's representation under section 74(9) read with rule 142(4). Form GST DRC-06 need not be furnished exclusively through the electronic portal; a manually filed reply acknowledged at personal hearing cannot be disregarded solely because it was unavailable online. Issuing a demand order before expiry of time allowed for supporting documents, without addressing the reply or jurisdictional objection, denies a meaningful hearing. Such procedural defects support writ intervention despite an alternative statutory remedy. The demand order was set aside and remitted for fresh adjudication, with jurisdictional and merits objections left open.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104749.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104749.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Input tax credit reversal on supplier credit notes was not mandatory; bona fide IGST adjustment did not attract fresh demand.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104748</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104748</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Recipient input tax credit did not require reversal solely because a supplier issued credit notes during the relevant period: neither the Act nor the Rules imposed that obligation, the statutory matching mechanism was inoperative, and Rule 37 concerned non-payment to suppliers. Accordingly, the premise for reversal failed. Excess IGST adjusted against CGST and SGST liabilities was procedurally irregular because the prescribed refund, re-credit or subsequent IGST-adjustment route was not used. However, as a bona fide first-year GST correction causing no revenue loss, it did not justify a fresh tax demand, interest or penalty; the departmental appeal was dismissed.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104748.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104748.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Leasehold rights assignment transfers benefits of immovable property, keeping industrial plot transfers outside the GST supply net.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104747</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104747</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Assignment of leasehold rights in an industrial plot to a third party is treated as a transfer of benefits arising from immovable property rather than a GST-taxable supply. A binding High Court ruling on that characterisation remains operative absent a stay or recall, notwithstanding an intended review. GST is therefore not leviable on such assignment, and the appellate order rejecting the departmental challenge stands sustained.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104747.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104747.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Retrospective price escalation triggers interest from original clearance, while bona fide transitional compliance does not attract tax penalty.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104746</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104746</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Retrospective contractual price escalation fixes the true value of pre-GST clearances from their original clearance date. Section 142(2)(a) permits GST-compliant debit notes and post-transition reporting of differential tax, but does not create a new taxable event or defer accrual of the enhanced value. Differential tax on the increased value is therefore due from inception, making statutory interest mandatory despite the absence of formal provisional assessment. Penalty under section 122 is not warranted where the differential tax is voluntarily paid after price finalisation under a bona fide understanding of complex transitional provisions, without suppression, fraud, wilful misstatement or deliberate evasion.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104746.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104746.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Adjusted total turnover requires inclusion of time-barred credit notes, but the zero-rated supply refund remained permissible.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104745</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104745</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Credit notes validly issued for returned or rejected supplies reduce taxable turnover and are deductible from adjusted total turnover under the zero-rated supply refund formula. Credit notes issued during the refund period against invoices for Financial Year 2019-20 after expiry of the statutory time limit cannot be excluded from adjusted total turnover and must be included on recomputation. As the recomputed refund remained within the maximum permissible amount, the refund already sanctioned remained admissible and the Revenue challenge failed.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104745.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104745.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Belated Credit Notes Increase Adjusted Total Turnover and Reduce Inverted Duty Structure Input Tax Credit Refunds</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104744</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104744</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[For inverted duty structure refunds, credit notes issued for returned or rejected supplies generally reduce taxable turnover and adjusted total turnover. Credit notes relating to invoices from an earlier financial year but issued after the statutory period for issuing and declaring them cannot be excluded from adjusted total turnover. Their value must therefore be included when recomputing accumulated input tax credit refund under Rule 89(5), reducing the refund to the permissible amount and requiring recovery of any excess refund.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104744.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104744.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Monetary-limit policy requires Revenue to prove a recognised exception before pursuing a GST penalty appeal on merits.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104743</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104743</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Departmental GST appeals challenging only a penalty must assess the disputed penalty against the applicable monetary threshold under the departmental litigation policy. An exception to that policy must be specifically identified and supported by the relevant facts and basis; it cannot be presumed. Commissioner authorisation to file an appeal under section 112(3) does not independently establish an exception or dispense with compliance with the monetary-limit policy. Absence of material showing a recorded case-specific opinion under a residual exception makes the appeal non-maintainable, without determination of the underlying tax merits.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104743.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104743.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Bogus Inward Supply Allegations Require Proof of Supplier Non-Existence or Tax Evasion Before GST Demands Survive</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104742</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104742</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[GST demands alleging bogus inward supplies require proof that the supplier firm was non-existent or that tax evasion occurred. Registration of the firm and filing of relevant statutory returns supported its existence. In the absence of evidence disproving those facts or establishing tax evasion, the allegation of a bogus or non-existent firm could not sustain the GST demand or penalty. The deletion of the demand and penalty was consequently maintained, and the Revenue's appeal failed.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104742.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104742.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Monetary-limit policy binds departmental GST appeals; absent a recognised exception and recorded Commissioner opinion, below-threshold appeals fail.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104741</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104741</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Departmental GST appeals below the prescribed monetary limit are governed by binding litigation-policy circulars. The disputed amount must be computed under the circular, and Revenue must establish a recognised exception. Reliance on the residual interest-of-justice-or-revenue exception requires the Commissioner's recorded, case-specific opinion and its basis; a general appellate authorisation is insufficient. Without such exception or supporting record, the departmental appeal was unmaintainable and dismissed at the threshold, leaving the underlying tax merits undecided.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104741.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104741.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Assignment of Industrial Leasehold Rights Is Treated as Immovable Property Transfer, Excluding GST on Third-Party Assignments</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104740</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104740</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Assignment by sale and transfer of leasehold rights in industrial plots allotted by GIDC is treated as a transfer of benefits arising from immovable property rather than a taxable supply under GST. On that basis, GST is not leviable on assignments to third-party assignees. An intention to seek review does not displace a binding ruling unless it is stayed or recalled.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104740.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104740.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Purpose test classifies electricity subsidies tied to production costs as taxable revenue receipts rather than capital assistance.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104739</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104739</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[The purpose test for subsidy receipts requires examination of the scheme's operative provisions rather than its nomenclature, source, form or payment timing. Electricity subsidy under the Pondicherry power subsidy scheme was payable after production and calculated as a percentage of actual energy charges. Because it directly reduced the cost of power used in manufacturing and was not linked or earmarked to capital expenditure or creation of a capital asset, it constituted operational assistance. The subsidy was therefore treated as a taxable revenue receipt rather than a capital receipt, and the appeal was dismissed.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104739.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104739.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Faceless assessment requires meaningful hearing where portal barriers prevent uploading responses and supporting evidence before adverse orders.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104738</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104738</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Faceless assessment must comply with principles of natural justice by providing precise notice and a reasonable opportunity to respond before an adverse quasi-judicial order affecting civil consequences is issued. Allowing less than three working days to respond was treated as inadequate where the assessee could not upload material on the portal and instead emailed a reply and supporting documents. Disregarding material acknowledged as forwarded to the Assessment Unit, and recording non-compliance contrary to the record, caused serious prejudice. The assessment order was quashed and remanded for fresh assessment after reasonable hearing and consideration of the response and documents already submitted.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104738.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104738.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Natural justice requires consideration of portal-filed adjournment requests before final assessment, requiring fresh assessment and hearing.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104737</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104737</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Failure to consider an adjournment request uploaded through the income-tax portal can deny the taxpayer an effective opportunity to respond to a show-cause notice and breach principles of natural justice. Portal-generated confirmation and subsequent communication established that the request had been filed but was not placed before the Assessing Officer. The final assessment was therefore set aside and remitted for fresh assessment, with an opportunity to submit a reply and receive a hearing.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104737.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104737.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Minimum alternate tax exclusion for regulated banking companies, with actual-payment leave encashment deduction and computer-rate UPS depreciation.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104736</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104736</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Minimum alternate tax does not apply to a banking company governed by the Banking Regulation Act, 1949. Leave-salary or leave-encashment liability may accrue under mercantile accounting, but its deduction is deferred until actual payment; an unpaid provision is not deductible. An uninterrupted power supply used solely to support a computer system, without evidence of independent use, forms an integral part of that system and qualifies for depreciation at the computer-equipment rate. The tax treatment therefore excludes regulated banking companies from minimum alternate tax and allows the higher computer-equipment depreciation rate, while denying deduction for unpaid leave-encashment provisions.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104736.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104736.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Political donation deduction fails where search admissions establish bogus contributions and evidence does not rebut the finding.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104735</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104735</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Political-party donation deduction under section 80GGC was denied because search-proceeding admissions supported the finding that the contribution was bogus, and no rebuttal evidence was furnished. Interest on borrowed capital claimed for house construction requires verification of the construction and supporting evidence where the loan is described as a personal loan; the claim was remitted for examination. Credit for tax deducted at source was directed to be allowed on recomputation. Professional-tax deduction omitted from the return requires proof of payment and was remitted for verification in accordance with law.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104735.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104735.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Related-party commission disallowance requires comparable evidence of excessiveness, not merely a payment relationship or cross-industry benchmark.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104734</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104734</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Related-party commission expenditure under section 40A(2)(b) is not disallowable solely because payment is made to a related person. Excessiveness or unreasonableness must be assessed against the fair market value of services, legitimate business needs, and benefit derived. A benchmark from an unrelated line of business, unsupported by comparable material, cannot establish that commission is excessive. Verification remains necessary to confirm services rendered and their commercial justification. Applying these principles, the related-party commission disallowance was deleted.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104734.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104734.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Non-filing of ITC-03 - does it attract penalty u/s.125</title>
<link>/forum/issue?id=121166</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">/forum/issue?id=121166</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Form ITC-03 non-filing after opting for the composition scheme raises a penalty issue where no input tax credit was availed and no credit reversal was required. One view treats filing as mandatory and considers the lapse subject to the general penalty provision, with the absence of revenue loss supporting a minimum penalty. The alternative view invokes protection for minor procedural breaches without fraud, gross negligence, or revenue loss, contending that no penalty or recovery should follow where no credit existed for reversal.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Discussion-Forum</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>On-money accrues on title transfer, requiring verification of later-year tax offers before sustaining additions in the original assessment year.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104733</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104733</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[On-money forming part of consideration for sale of flats accrues when the sale deed is executed and title transfers, rather than on mere receipt as an advance, under the project-completion method. Disclosed on-money offered in the respective years of sale-deed registration cannot be taxed wholly in the earlier assessment year without verifying later-year tax offerings. Balance additions require limited verification of income offered within the stipulated undertaking periods; verified amounts must be deleted, while amounts not offered may be taxed in the earlier year. No further deferment beyond those stipulated periods is permitted.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104733.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104733.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Transfer pricing of compulsorily convertible debenture interest requires a prescribed arm's length method; nil pricing lacked support.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104732</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104732</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Compulsorily convertible debentures do not warrant a nil arm's length price for pre-conversion coupon interest merely because conversion is mandatory and cash redemption is unavailable. Recharacterisation of debt requires contractual and economic facts showing divergence between form and substance or commercial irrationality, and a nil return must be supported by a prescribed transfer-pricing method and uncontrolled comparables. The nil transfer-pricing adjustment was deleted, while the proposed domestic benchmark remained subject to scrutiny. The related interest disallowance was set aside pending verification of capitalisation, business use and interest-limitation treatment, without double deduction or double disallowance. Consequential statutory interest or fees must identify the charging provision, period and calculation; a penalty challenge remains premature before a penalty order.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104732.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104732.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Bona fide disclosure shields software-development expense claims from under-reporting penalties despite their capital treatment in tax assessments.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104731</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104731</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Section 270A excludes an amount from under-reported income where the taxpayer gives a bona fide explanation and fully discloses material facts needed to support it. Rejection of a claim in quantum proceedings does not itself establish false particulars, concealment, or lack of bona fides. Software-development expenditure and its accounting treatment disclosed in audited financial statements may therefore remain eligible for exclusion where the dispute concerns the debatable legal characterisation of the expenditure as revenue expenditure or capital loss. On the stated facts, the statutory exclusion applied and the penalty was deleted.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104731.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104731.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Builder-financing additions fail without proof of unexplained source, while disputed stamp values require DVO-based reassessment.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104730</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104730</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Builder-financing additions for alleged cash receipts or payments cannot be sustained as unexplained money or unexplained investment where the amount represents return of an accounted banking-channel advance and no independent unexplained source or accretion is established. Alleged interest income cannot be inferred solely from a purported financing arrangement where property acquisitions were explained as investments generating rental income and capital gains. Stamp-duty valuation provisions apply to immovable-property acquisitions irrespective of their characterisation as builder financing. Where the stamp-duty value of under-construction property is disputed, fair market value must be determined through the statutory valuation mechanism before taxability and quantum are decided; the valuation issues require DVO-based fresh determination after hearing the assessee.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104730.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104730.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Reassessment based on investigation information remained valid, while unverified cash sales deposits were sustained as unexplained cash credit.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104729</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104729</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Reassessment initiated on specific Investigation Wing information about substantial cash deposits was sustained where the Assessing Officer examined the information and formed a belief that income had escaped assessment. Recording cash receipts as sales did not by itself establish that corresponding bank deposits arose from business sales; reliable linkage among the sales, stock movement and deposits was required to rebut an unexplained cash-credit addition. A challenge to mere initiation of penalty proceedings was premature, while interest levied consequentially on the assessment followed the assessment outcome.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104729.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104729.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Kachha arhtia turnover excludes principals' sale proceeds, making tax audit and non-audit penalty dependent on agency proof.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104728</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104728</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[For a vegetable-market commission agent claiming status as a kachha arhtia, sale proceeds handled for principals do not constitute turnover for tax-audit purposes; gross commission alone is relevant under the CBDT Circular. Status must be verified because no conclusive material ruled out own-account purchases or sales. The penalty issue was restored for limited verification: proof of exclusive agency eliminates the audit obligation and penalty; otherwise, the penalty's sustainability must be determined in accordance with law.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104728.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104728.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Form 10AB technical errors require rectification before charitable registration and approval applications face technical rejection.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104727</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104727</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Incorrect selection of an applicable clause or code in Form 10AB for charitable registration or approval, when bona fide and inadvertent, warrants an opportunity for rectification rather than rejection solely on that technical ground. Where provisional registration has been granted on the same application, the technical error should not prevent consideration on merits. Applications may be reconsidered after correction of the form and a proper hearing, ensuring that procedural defects do not defeat substantive eligibility.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104727.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104727.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Amendment in the Export Policy of Baryte (Natural Barium Sulphate) classified under ITC(HS) Codes 25111010 and 25111020</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/circulars?id=71546</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/circulars?id=71546</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Grade A Baryte lumps and Grade B Baryte powder move from free to restricted export status and require applicable authorisation or licensing. Grade CDW Baryte, having specific gravity below 4.00, remains freely exportable. Consignments declared as Grade CDW, or as Baryte without a grade in the Shipping Bill, require mandatory specific-gravity testing before export. The test report determines the applicable Baryte grade for export-policy purposes.]]></description>
<category>Customs</category>
<category>Circulars</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Consequential assessment limits prevented share-premium addition, while unsecured loans required lender-wise verification under the applicable statutory burden.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104726</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104726</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Consequential assessment following revision directions was confined to verifying DCF share valuation and projection assumptions; because the directions did not require treating share premium as unexplained cash credit, the Section 68 addition was deleted. Where valuation exceeded fair market value, Section 56(2)(viib), subject to its conditions, was identified as the relevant provision. For AY 2014-15, the unamended Section 68 required proof of creditor identity, transaction genuineness and lender creditworthiness, not source of source. Generalised treatment of lender evidence required limited lender-wise verification, so the unsecured-loan addition was remanded without a merits determination.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104726.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104726.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Cash returned from recorded builder payments is not unexplained money absent proof of separate unaccounted accretion.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104725</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104725</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Cash returned by builders from property payments made through banking channels constitutes circulation of explained funds, not unexplained money, unless evidence establishes a separate unexplained asset or accretion; the related addition was deleted. Alleged cash interest from builder financing was unsustainable where disclosed property investments, rent and capital gains supported appreciation rather than separate interest; that addition was deleted. Acquisition below stamp-duty value can attract section 56(2)(x)(b) irrespective of a transaction's builder-financing character, but disputed values require fair-market-value determination before taxability is decided; the issue was remanded. Set-off of brought-forward long-term capital loss was also remanded for verification of eligibility and the character of current-year capital gains.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104725.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104725.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Search-related reassessment notices require independent prior approval, and an inapplicable section 148A process cannot cure jurisdictional defects.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104724</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104724</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Search-related information concerning alleged non-genuine purchases must be addressed through the statutory reassessment route applicable where material is found in another person's search. The ordinary procedure under section 148A cannot displace that route. Approval for an order under section 148A(d) does not substitute for the independent prior approval required before issuing a notice under section 148. Compliance with the prescribed jurisdictional procedure is mandatory, not procedural; non-compliance creates a foundational jurisdictional defect and renders the reassessment notice and consequential assessment liable to be quashed without determination of the underlying addition.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104724.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104724.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Union Finance Minister Smt. Nirmala Sitharaman on visit to Singapore for high-level meetings with Singapore Leadership and CEOs of business firms in Singapore</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=75063</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=75063</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[India-Singapore investment cooperation is to be strengthened through engagements with political leadership, business representatives and global institutional investors. Discussions cover trade and investment, digital financial connectivity, capital markets, taxation, advanced manufacturing, skilling and aviation. The National Investment and Infrastructure Fund and GIFT City are identified as channels for Singaporean capital participation through investment vehicles and funds. The Ministry of Finance will facilitate connections between investors, Indian companies, financial institutions and State Governments for identified investment opportunities.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>News</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Fresh evidence in first appeal may be examined under coterminous appellate powers, with remand verification where factual disputes remain unresolved.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104723</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104723</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[First appellate authorities with powers coterminous with the Assessing Officer may examine fresh evidence filed in appeal and may obtain a remand report where verification is required. Rejecting fresh purchase, vendor-balance, sales, expense, and tax-deduction details solely because complete material was not furnished during assessment leaves factual disputes unverified. Additions and disallowances founded on such discrepancies require fresh verification through de novo adjudication, with an adequate hearing opportunity and taxpayer cooperation.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104723.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104723.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Attorney-holder status in development agreements requires verification before capital-gains liability can be determined on the merits.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104722</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104722</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Capital-gains liability under a development agreement requires factual verification where the sale deed and power of attorney indicate that the assessee acted only as the landowner's attorney holder. Because these documents were not produced before the lower authorities and required consideration alongside the Revenue's submissions, the liability was not decided on merits. The appellate order was set aside and the matter was remitted to the CIT(A) for fresh consideration of the documents and submissions.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104722.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104722.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Write-back of unallowed provisions requires verification to prevent repeat taxation and double addition in book-profit computation.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104721</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104721</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Write-back of a general provision for standard assets requires factual verification in both normal income and book-profit computations where no earlier deduction was claimed. Because the reversal is recorded as a negative expense increasing profit, a further tax adjustment may produce duplicate taxation. A security-deposit provision voluntarily added back in computing book profit should not be added again, subject to record verification. Entitlement to tax deducted at source credit requires verification. Refund adjustment, interest and penalty issues depend on these assessment variations and require reconsideration only after the underlying facts are determined.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104721.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104721.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Consignment sales cannot become agent turnover solely from cess payment; unverified balances require factual verification before deletion.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104720</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104720</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Consignment sales undertaken by a del credere commission agent for consignors, with commission income recorded, cannot be treated as the agent's own turnover merely because APMC cess was paid; the estimated profit addition was therefore deleted. Agency receivables and payables require factual verification that individual balances arise from commission transactions, including appropriate confirmations; their deletion was set aside for fresh verification. Unidentified additional evidence cannot support a Rule 46A objection where the allegedly new documents are not identified. Loans, advances and deposits require verification of their source, nature and genuineness; deletion without examining incomplete balance details was set aside, and the addition restored.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104720.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104720.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Transfer pricing on quasi-equity funding cannot create taxable interest where recovery is uncertain and no real income accrues.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104719</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104719</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Transfer-pricing principles preclude notional interest on quasi-equity OFCDs or unrecoverable associated-enterprise funding where recovery is uncertain and no real income accrues; payment under an invoked guarantee is not necessarily a lending transaction. Parent-company guarantees require arm's-length treatment distinct from bank guarantees. Inventory may be valued at the lower of cost and net realisable value where a consistently applied method and adverse market conditions support the valuation. Actual share-transfer consideration could not be replaced with fair market value to deny capital losses before the applicable substitution provision took effect. Foreign-exchange loss, income reconciliation, depreciation set-off and TDS credit require factual verification, including whether corresponding income was taxed.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104719.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104719.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Customs appellate jurisdiction excludes only baggage, specified unloaded-import goods and drawback matters; seizure appeals lie before the Tribunal.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104718</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104718</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[The Appellate Tribunal's jurisdiction is excluded only for appellate orders concerning baggage, specified goods loaded for import but not unloaded, or drawback. Confiscation of Indian currency, mobile phones and a domestically registered car, coupled with a smuggling-related penalty, did not fall within those excluded categories because the items were neither imported nor exported and the car was not loaded with gold when seized. The prescribed remedy was therefore an appeal to the Appellate Tribunal, not a revision application. The writ petition was dismissed, with liberty to file the appeal within thirty days; it must be decided on merits without reference to limitation.]]></description>
<category>Customs</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104718.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104718.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Customs Broker due diligence: statutory importer documents can suffice, while unsupported allegations and indefinite licence suspension cannot stand.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104717</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104717</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Customs Broker due diligence is satisfied by obtaining statutory documents establishing an importer's genuineness; it does not require physical verification of the importer's premises. Licence suspension for alleged regulatory breaches requires identified and substantiated evidence rather than general allegations. Because suspension seriously restricts business operations, prescribed timelines for revocation proceedings are mandatory: authorities must initiate and complete those proceedings within the stipulated period and cannot maintain an indefinite suspension pending investigation. Unsupported allegations and non-compliance with the time-bound procedure make continued suspension unsustainable.]]></description>
<category>Customs</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104717.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104717.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Split consignment classification treated complementary motorcycle parts as one imported motorcycle, sustaining valuation, confiscation and importer liability.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104716</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104716</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Section 138B limits substantive reliance on statements recorded under Section 108 unless its prescribed conditions are fulfilled; non-retraction alone does not cure non-compliance. A concurring approach treated examination of the maker as non-mandatory in departmental adjudication where no prejudice or involuntariness was established. Independent physical, expert and documentary material established that complementary split consignments formed one previously registered motorcycle, supporting reclassification, rejection of declared transaction value, and residual valuation. Duty was confined to the real importer, rather than imposed jointly and severally. Misdeclaration and breach of import restrictions supported confiscation and penalties for knowingly false declarations, subject to reductions. DRI officers and the common adjudicating authority were considered competent.]]></description>
<category>Customs</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104716.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104716.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Statutory act of insolvency: attempted property transfer and debt default cannot sustain a creditor's insolvency petition.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104715</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104715</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Creditor insolvency petitions require proof that the debtor committed a statutory act of insolvency within the prescribed period; the conditions are conjunctive. An attempted or agreed transfer of property, without an actual transfer, does not fall within the statutory definition. Non-repayment of debt may support a money claim but does not independently constitute an act of insolvency. Because no qualifying statutory act was established, the High Court set aside the insolvency adjudication and all consequential directions, while preserving creditors' ability to pursue other remedies in law.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104715.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104715.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Going-concern liquidation sale commencement follows the liquidation order, preserving pre-amendment rights despite later regulatory changes.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104714</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104714</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Going-concern liquidation sale commences from the liquidation order where that order incorporates the creditors' committee recommendation and directs the Liquidator to first pursue that sale mode. Auction notices and an Asset Sale Process Document are subsequent implementation measures, not events that initiate liquidation. A saving clause must be read within the statutory liquidation scheme, and amendments to liquidation regulations operate prospectively unless expressly made retrospective; they cannot displace rights and obligations crystallised under the prior regime. The period for endeavouring a going-concern sale is directory and may be extended, particularly where judicial restraint prevented issuance of an auction notice. Rejection of the Liquidator's request for extension and permission to complete the sale was set aside for further action according to law.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104714.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104714.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Bankruptcy estate vesting makes post-commencement bank withdrawals unauthorised, while jewellery sale proceeds remain available to creditors.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104713</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104713</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[From the commencement of personal bankruptcy, money standing to the bankrupt's credit in a bank account constitutes property vested by law in the Bankruptcy Trustee. Post-commencement withdrawals are therefore unauthorised dealings and must be returned, irrespective of claimed lack of knowledge where prior notice and creditor-meeting participation exist. Statutory exclusion for unencumbered personal ornaments is limited by prescribed conditions and a value cap; it does not extend to sale proceeds deposited in a bank account, particularly where the claimed proceeds exceed that cap. Recall of an ex parte return order requires demonstrated prejudice, which was not established. Both appeals were dismissed.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104713.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104713.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Partial amendment to Public Notice No. 86/2009 dated 18.11.2009 issued vide S/12-Gen-42/2008 AM(X)/NS-II</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/circulars?id=71544</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/circulars?id=71544</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Inter-CFS transfer of export cargo after grant of a Let Export Order may be permitted without Customs escort, subject to direct movement from the forwarding CFS to the receiving CFS in closed-body trucks or domestic containers under a Customs Bottle Seal. The seal must be verified at the receiving CFS before de-stuffing, re-stuffing, or further consolidation, as applicable.]]></description>
<category>Customs</category>
<category>Circulars</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>IMMOVABLE PROPERTY IS MOVING...UNPACKING SECTION 17(5)(d) OF THE CGST ACT</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17522</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17522</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Input tax credit for capital installations depends first on whether the asset is immovable property. Earth-fastening for stability, alignment, vibration control or safety does not by itself establish immovability where modular equipment can be unfastened, dismantled and relocated without fatal damage or loss of commercial identity. For installations with civil-fixation features, eligibility requires a fact-specific functionality assessment of whether the asset is indispensable to outward taxable supplies or business operations, together with evidence of demountability and operational nexus.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Articles</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/article_17522.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/article_17522.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Recommendations of the 57th Meeting of the GST Council</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=75062</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=75062</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[GST process reforms propose automated registration, registration amendments and cancellation, return reconciliation, input tax credit correction, and phased system-based refund processing. Standardised demand notices and adjudication safeguards are proposed alongside lower penalties, capped penalty-only appeal pre-deposits, withdrawal of arrest powers and narrowed prosecution provisions. Input tax credit reforms would expand refunds and remove specified blocked-credit restrictions, while export measures would broaden zero-rated and export-of-services eligibility. Goods interception would be intelligence-based and authorised, with further compliance relief for small taxpayers and targeted classification, exemption and reverse-charge measures.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>News</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Securities and Exchange Board of India (Settlement of Administrative and Civil Proceedings) Regulations, 2026</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/notifications?id=147228</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/notifications?id=147228</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Settlement of administrative and civil securities-law proceedings may be sought before initiation, while pending before the Board, or during an appeal. Applicants must file prescribed forms, waivers, a proposed settlement computation and fees, and ordinarily must apply within the applicable time limit. Settlement terms may include a formula-based settlement amount, disgorgement with interest, disclosures and remedial or regulatory conditions. Eligibility is restricted for specified prior rejections, pending investigations, certain defaulting persons, and matters involving serious market or investor impact. Internal and advisory committees examine proposed terms, while the Panel of Whole Time Members decides acceptance, rejection or reconsideration.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>Notifications</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Income Tax Act of 2025 and 1961 - Apportionment of income between spouses governed by Portuguese Civil Code compared and analysed.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17548</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17548</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Spouses governed by the Portuguese community of property system are assessed separately rather than as an association of persons or body of individuals. Income under heads other than Salaries is apportioned equally and included in each spouse's total income. Salary income is taxable only to the spouse who actually earns it. Individual returns are filed under the ordinarily applicable prescribed forms, with Schedule 5A in ITR-2 and ITR-3 recording relevant spouse information.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Articles</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/article_17548.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/article_17548.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>COMPOSITE APPEAL AGAINST THE JOINT PROCEEDINGS</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17547</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17547</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Composite appeal maintainability may arise when suits involving the same plaintiff are consolidated, tried on common evidence, and disposed of by a common judgment with separate decrees. The proviso to Order XLI Rule 1(1) permits dispensing with multiple copies of the common judgment. Where the memorandum challenges both decrees, attaches certified copies of each decree, and carries the requisite court fees, the absence of separate appeal memoranda is a curable procedural defect rather than a fatal bar to appellate consideration on merits.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>Articles</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/article_17547.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/article_17547.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>ARRESTS UNDER GOODS AND SERVICES TAX (PART-3)</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17546</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17546</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[GST arrest safeguards require credible and recorded reasons to believe, clear evidence of the relevant offence and mens rea, and consideration of investigative necessity, evidence tampering, witness influence, and absconding risk. Arrest must not be routine, mechanical, or based on technical infractions. The arrest memo must identify applicable provisions and provide written grounds of arrest with acknowledgement. Bail conditions must be communicated, proportionate to financial capacity, and not excessive; persons requiring production before a Magistrate must be produced within the prescribed period.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Articles</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/article_17546.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/article_17546.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Withdrawal Without Liberty Closes The Writ Door</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17545</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17545</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Unconditional withdrawal of a writ petition without express liberty to file afresh ordinarily abandons the Article 226 remedy for the same cause of action. Changes in drafting, additional legal grounds, or challenges to related proceedings do not create a fresh cause where the substantive target remains the same GST adjudication order. Later liberty cannot retrospectively cure an earlier unconditional withdrawal. Article 226 also cannot ordinarily replace a statutory appeal that has lapsed without satisfactory explanation. The procedural restriction concerns maintainability and does not determine the substantive validity of the underlying tax demand.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Articles</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/article_17545.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/article_17545.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Amendment to Electronics and Information Technology Goods (Requirement for Compulsory Registration) Order, 2021 - inclusion of Screen Protectors for smartphones</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/circulars?id=71543</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/circulars?id=71543</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Compulsory registration requirements under the Electronics and Information Technology Goods (Requirement for Compulsory Registration) Order, 2021 are extended to screen protectors for smartphones. These goods must conform to Indian Standard IS 19348:2025, titled "Glass Screen Protector - Specification." The registration requirement applies from 1 April 2027, and customs field formations must take the expanded compulsory registration coverage into account for necessary action.]]></description>
<category>Customs</category>
<category>Circulars</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>India Began Building Bridges When the World Was Building Walls: Union Minister of Commerce and Industry Shri Piyush Goyal</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=75061</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=75061</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Free Trade Agreements are positioned to preserve sensitive domestic interests, particularly agriculture, fisheries and MSMEs, while widening market access for agricultural, marine, engineering, precision and electronic products and facilitating foreign investment. Proposed FTA utilisation desks across State Councils would assist MSMEs in using preferential arrangements, understanding rules of origin and market-access opportunities, participating in delegations and exhibitions, and presenting products and technologies to overseas markets.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>News</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Faceless Reassessment Jurisdiction: Retrospective Validation under Section 147A and Automated Allocation of Reassessment Cases</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/tmi_notes?id=2542</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/tmi_notes?id=2542</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Section 151A and the e-Assessment of Income Escaping Assessment Scheme, 2022 require covered reassessment functions and section 148 notice issuance through automated allocation. Risk-based selection of cases is distinct from randomised allocation of the officer authorised to act. Sections 148A and 148 form an integrated reassessment sequence, so general concurrent jurisdiction, administrative instructions or digital service cannot substitute for the prescribed faceless allocation. Section 147A did not amend the continuing statutory and scheme-based allocation requirements and is treated as constitutionally invalid.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Notes</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/note_2542.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/note_2542.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Doctrine of Merger: Effect of Non-Speaking and Speaking Dismissal of Special Leave Petitions on Merger and Review</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/tmi_notes?id=2541</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/tmi_notes?id=2541</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Under Article 136, a refusal of special leave remains a discretionary leave-stage determination. A non-speaking dismissal does not merge the challenged lower-court decision into a Supreme Court order, affirm its reasoning, or automatically create res judicata. A speaking refusal may bind only as to legal propositions expressly declared under Article 141, without producing merger. Merger arises when leave is granted and appellate jurisdiction is exercised. Review, writ, and remanded proceedings remain subject to independent procedural requirements, including limitation and safeguards against abuse.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Notes</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/note_2541.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/note_2541.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Section 37 of the NDPS Act: Twin Conditions for Grant of Bail in Commercial Quantity Cases</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/tmi_notes?id=2540</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/tmi_notes?id=2540</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Section 37 of the NDPS Act imposes cumulative bail conditions in commercial-quantity cases: the court must find reasonable grounds to believe the accused is not guilty and unlikely to reoffend while on bail. These requirements supplement ordinary bail factors and demand a genuine, provisional assessment of credible material. Personal liberty and trial delay remain relevant, but must be reconciled with the statutory threshold. Bail conditions, including verification safeguards for foreign nationals, must be proportionate, genuine and capable of enforcement.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>Notes</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/note_2540.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/note_2540.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Pilferage of Imported Goods: Approval, Custody and Duty Liability under the Customs Act, 1962</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/tmi_notes?id=2539</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/tmi_notes?id=2539</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Customs-duty liability for pilfered imported goods arises only where pilferage occurs after unloading in a customs area while goods are held by an approved custodian. Approval is indispensable; factual control or statutory custody alone does not impose this liability for a period before approval. Importer duty exemption for pre-clearance pilferage operates alongside the custodian's revenue liability. Pilferage must be proved through contemporaneous records and cannot be presumed from every cargo discrepancy, shortage, or loss.]]></description>
<category>Customs</category>
<category>Notes</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/note_2539.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/note_2539.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Genuine Hardship in Delayed Revised Returns Requires Condonation Review Before Independent Examination of Exemption and Refund Claims</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104712</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104712</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Section 119(2)(b) permits exceptional admission of a delayed exemption, deduction or refund claim after the revised-return period under Section 139(5) has expired, where this is necessary to avoid genuine hardship. Condonation removes only the procedural bar; exemption, taxability, refund and interest remain subject to independent merits determination under the applicable provisions. Genuine hardship requires a fact-sensitive assessment of bona fides, promptness, the nature of the omission and the practical consequence of refusal. Prima facie verification may test whether the claim is genuine and supportable, but must not become a final adjudication. Comparable decisions may establish that a claim is arguable, while factual verification and substantive scrutiny remain available after admission.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104712.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104712.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Verified TDS deduction protects domestic taxpayers from denied credit, refund adjustment, and duplicate recovery despite deductor default.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104711</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104711</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Verified actual TDS deduction supports credit even where the deductor fails to deposit tax, file statements, issue Form 16 or Form 16A, or generate a Form 26AS entry. Section 205 prevents direct or indirect recovery from the deductee to the extent tax was deducted, including adjustment of refunds; post-deduction default remains actionable against the deductor. Section 199 and Rule 37BA require a verification-based credit process harmonised with that protection. The taxpayer must provide reliable, payment-specific evidence, such as payslips, invoices, bank records, payer correspondence or confirmations. The Assessing Officer must conduct factual verification; unsubstantiated claims receive no protection. The stated position is confined to domestic transactions.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104711.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104711.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Timely pronouncement of reserved judgments requires defined timelines, transparency measures, and remedial pathways to protect liberty and effective justice.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104710</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104710</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Article 21's guarantee of fair procedure encompasses timely pronouncement of reserved judgments. A binding framework requires High Courts to endeavour to pronounce reasoned judgments within three months of reservation, with administrative escalation, rehearing before another Bench where delay continues, and applications for early pronouncement or reassignment. Liberty matters require extra promptitude: reserved bail matters should ordinarily be decided and uploaded the next day, and orders granting bail, suspending sentence or acquitting persons in custody require immediate communication and release subject to stated exceptions. Operative-part orders are exceptional; reasons must be uploaded within seven days, or within fifteen days where p.....]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104710.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104710.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Settlement-price depression requires proof of manipulation, not merely short exposure, late selling, or below-market orders, preserving disclosure penalties.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104709</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104709</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[PFUTP liability for alleged settlement-price depression requires cogent evidence of a manipulative act directed at producing an artificial price, not merely a large short derivatives position, closing-window cash sales, or sell orders below the last traded price. Fraud under Regulation 2(1)(c) ordinarily requires inducement; where inducement is not directly established, manipulation requires compelling evidence from market-wide activity, execution mechanics, commercial rationale, and causal price impact. Position-limit breaches and agency-based concentration may support disclosure penalties but do not alone prove fraud. Combined exposure across all derivative contracts must be considered where required by the governing framework. Failure to establish intended price depression precluded PFUTP fraud and disgorgement, while the non-disclosure penalty remained.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104709.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104709.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Foreign LTC tax treatment requires TDS on known non-exempt travel claims despite recovery-related interim relief.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104708</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104708</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Foreign LTC/LFC payments involving an overseas leg or circuitous route fall outside the Section 10(5) exemption, which Rule 2B limits to actual eligible travel to a place in India and shortest-route fare ceilings. Reimbursement limited to a domestic-fare equivalent or a domestic segment does not preserve the exemption. Under Section 192, employers must include known non-exempt payments in estimated salary and deduct tax based on available claim particulars, although they have no unlimited verification duty. Interim recovery restraints do not automatically suspend TDS obligations. Section 201 relief requires recipient-specific return, tax-payment and accountant-certificate proof; interest and Section 271C penalty require separate analysis, including reasonable cause.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104708.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104708.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Extended GST limitation requires a notice to plead fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression with supporting factual particulars.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104707</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104707</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Section 74 of the CGST Act permits the extended limitation route only where a show cause notice states factual grounds showing that tax short-payment, erroneous refund, or wrongful input tax credit arose by reason of fraud, wilful misstatement, or suppression intended to evade tax. Bare statutory labels, audit objections, later affidavits, or new grounds in an order cannot cure a notice lacking that jurisdictional foundation. Section 75(7) confines confirmation to grounds specified in the notice, while Section 75(2) may deem a validly founded Section 74 notice to be under Section 73 if aggravated conduct is not established. Deliberate conduct, causal nexus, and taxpayer disclosure are central to extended limitation.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104707.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104707.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Condonation of Delay in Statutory Appeals under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/tmi_notes?id=2538</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/tmi_notes?id=2538</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 applies to a special statutory appeal through Section 29(2) unless the governing enactment excludes it expressly or by necessary implication. A special limitation period alone is insufficient to exclude condonation. Restrictive language, a defined maximum condonable period, or a complete statutory limitation code may create a non-extendable outer limit. Section 9 of the Chhattisgarh Rajya Suraksha Adhiniyam contains a 30-day appeal period and excludes certified-copy time, but lacks an express bar or outer condonation ceiling; delay may therefore be considered upon proof of sufficient cause.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>Notes</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/note_2538.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/note_2538.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Introduction of Credit Risk-o-Meter as an additional disclosure mechanism for debt securities</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/circulars?id=71541</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/circulars?id=71541</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Mandatory Credit Risk-o-Meter disclosure applies to listed and proposed-to-be-listed debt securities across offer documents, private placement materials, advertisements, and Online Bond Platform Provider interfaces. The colour-coded meter maps credit ratings to six risk levels, identifies the rating agency and actual rating, reflects the lowest rating where multiple ratings exist, and highlights unsecured instruments and Issuer is Not Cooperating status. Online Bond Platform Providers must use credit ratings from SEBI-registered agencies, update the meter within 24 hours of rating-change intimation, prohibit manual overrides, and maintain audit trails.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>Circulars</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Seeks to amend Notification No. 62/1994-Customs (N.T.) dated the 21st November, 1994 - Customs ports — Appointment for specified purposes</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/notifications?id=147222</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/notifications?id=147222</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[The revised customs port appointment for Dabhol Port covers unloading machinery and equipment for the Ratnagiri Gas and Power Private Limited Power Project, unloading liquefied natural gas and naptha, and loading imported project machinery and equipment for export. It also permits Square Port Shipyard Private Limited to unload goods for manufacturing and repairing ships, barges, similar vessels and rigs; import them for repair; and export them.]]></description>
<category>Customs</category>
<category>Notifications</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Merchant banker appointment exemption permits eligible regulated listed issuers to privately place highly rated debt without appointing one.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104706</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104706</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Eligible listed issuers regulated by SEBI, RBI, IRDAI or PFRDA may privately place debt securities without appointing a merchant banker if all prescribed conditions are met. The issuer must have been listed for at least one year, have no pending SEBI or stock-exchange fines or penalties for applicable listing-compliance breaches, and have no payment default during the preceding three financial years or current financial year, supported by a statutory auditor's certificate. The debt must generally be senior, secured by a first or pari passu charge, and rated at least AA-, based on the lowest rating where multiple ratings exist. Stock exchanges must prescribe operational disclosures and monitor compliance. The changes apply immediately.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104706.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104706.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Reassignment of pending legacy indirect-tax appeals directs listed matters to designated appellate Commissioners for Orders-in-Appeal.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104705</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104705</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Listed Central Excise and Service Tax appeals filed on or after 1 July 2017 are reassigned, in partial modification of the earlier allocation order, to the designated Commissioners of the Kolkata Appeal-II and Howrah Commissionerates. The reassignment covers the appeals identified in the annexure for disposal through Orders-in-Appeal under the Central Excise Act, 1944 or the Finance Act, 1994, as applicable. It governs pre-GST matters concerning acts or omissions before the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 came into force.]]></description>
<category>Excise</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104705.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104705.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Export Declaration Form authentication at Non-EDI Customs locations requires secure electronic forwarding to the designated Authorised Dealer.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104704</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104704</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Exporters at Non-EDI Customs locations must furnish physical Export Declaration Forms (EDFs) specifying the full export value at the time of export. Customs Commissioners must ensure that EDFs are authenticated by the specified authority and forwarded to the Authorised Dealer named in the form. Wherever practicable, transmission must occur electronically from a single official Government email address to reduce misuse and forged-document risks, with internal records maintained for all authenticated and forwarded EDFs. EDI-port EDFs remain deemed submitted with the Shipping Bill. Non-EDI locations must implement this mechanism from 1 October 2026.]]></description>
<category>Customs</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104704.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104704.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Customs area declaration enables O Yard CFS to handle Kamarajar Port import, baggage and export cargo under prescribed procedures.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104703</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104703</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Chennai Container Terminal's O Yard CFS is declared a customs area under section 8(b) of the Customs Act, 1962, for imported FCL and LCL cargo, including unaccompanied baggage, arriving from Kamarajar Port, and for export cargo until export. Cargo handling must comply with the Handling of Cargo in Customs Areas Regulations, 2009 and applicable customs procedures. The declaration takes effect on 30 September 2026.]]></description>
<category>Customs</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104703.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104703.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Customs custody appointment extends O Yard CFS responsibility to imports and exports routed through Kamarajar Port.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104702</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104702</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Chennai Container Terminal Pvt Ltd's O Yard CFS is appointed custodian under section 45(1) for imported goods landed at Kamarajar Port and received at the CFS until clearance for home consumption, warehousing, or transhipment. It is also custodian of export cargo brought into its premises until export from that port. The custodian must comply with section 45, the Handling of Cargo in Customs Areas Regulations, 2009, and applicable rules, regulations, and instructions. The appointment takes effect on 30 September 2026.]]></description>
<category>Customs</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104702.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104702.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Re-assignment of appeals pending in Kolkata Zone in partial modification of Order No. 04/2025 dated 28.04.2025</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/circulars?id=71534</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/circulars?id=71534</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Specified legacy Central Excise and Service Tax appeals filed on or after 1 July 2017 in the Kolkata Zone are reassigned under transitional powers to designated Central Excise Officers. Serial entries 1 to 141 are allotted to Nikhil Prabhakar Meshram, Commissioner, Kolkata Appeal-II Commissionerate, while serial entries 142 to 241 are allotted to Dinesh K. Chakravarthy, Commissioner, Howrah Commissionerate. Each officer is assigned to pass Orders-in-Appeal under the applicable Central Excise or Service Tax appellate provision.]]></description>
<category>Excise</category>
<category>Circulars</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Exemption from the requirement of mandatory merchant banker appointment for debt issued through private placement by certain listed issuers</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/circulars?id=71540</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/circulars?id=71540</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Merchant banker appointment remains mandatory for private-placement issuance unless an issuer satisfies all exemption conditions. The issuer must be regulated by an Indian financial sector regulator, listed for at least one year without pending listing-compliance fines or penalties, and free from specified payment defaults during the preceding three financial years and current financial year, as certified by its statutory auditor. The debt must generally be senior or unsubordinated and secured by a first or pari passu charge, with specified public-sector exceptions, and must have a minimum AA- rating.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>Circulars</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>CCI approves acquisition of sole control over Omega-Meyer Ltd and Meyer Organics by BCPE Wellbeing Holdco Two Ltd. and Integral Investments Asia IV Ltd</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=75060</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=75060</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Competition Commission of India approval permits BCPE Wellbeing Holdco Two Limited and Integral Investments Asia IV Limited, funds managed or advised by Bain Capital, to acquire sole control over Omega-Meyer Limited and Meyer Organics Private Limited. The target businesses provide nutraceuticals globally and in India, while Meyer Organics Private Limited also produces and supplies certain over-the-counter and prescription finished-dose pharmaceuticals in India.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>News</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>CCI approves proposed acquisition of 100% shareholding of Vishavari Tollway Ltd and nine SPVs operating road assets in India by Concessoc 41 SAS</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=75059</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=75059</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Competition Commission of India approval covers the acquisition by Concessoc 41 SAS of the entire shareholding in Vishavari Tollway Private Limited and nine special purpose vehicles. The target entities operate designated national-highway stretches in Andhra Pradesh, Odisha and Gujarat, while Vishavari Tollway Private Limited provides operation and maintenance and engineering, procurement and construction services for those highway assets.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>News</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>CCI approves acquisition of certain shareholding in Prestige Hospitality Ventures Limited by CPP Investment Board Pvt. Holdings (4) Inc.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=75058</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=75058</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Competition Commission of India approved the proposed combination involving CPP Investment Board Private Holdings (4) Inc.'s acquisition of certain shareholding in Prestige Hospitality Ventures Limited. The target is an Indian public limited company within the Prestige group and owns and develops hospitality assets, including hotels and serviced apartments. The acquirer is incorporated in Canada and is managed by Canada Pension Plan Investment Board.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>News</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>CCI approves proposed combination related to internal restructuring of the JSW Group</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=75057</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=75057</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Merger-control approval covers the proposed internal JSW Group restructuring through amalgamation of BMM Ispat Limited into JSW Steel Limited. The amalgamation would convert the group's majority interest in BMM into full ownership and is intended to enhance operational, financial and organisational efficiencies through economies of scale, resource pooling and capital rationalisation. BMM is commercially integrated in the group's supply chain through intra-group sales and procurements.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>News</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Pre-Deposit Before Final Acknowledgement Saves The Appeal</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17542</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17542</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Rule 110 separates electronic presentation from legal filing. A Provisional Acknowledgement records receipt of Form GST APL-05 and permits Registry scrutiny; under the Explanation to Rule 110(4), an appeal is treated as filed only upon a Final Acknowledgement carrying an appeal number. A pre-deposit required during scrutiny, if paid within the permitted defect-removal period and before Final Acknowledgement, meets the timing requirement for final filing. This mechanism permits cure of a pre-deposit deficiency but does not waive the payment condition.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Articles</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/article_17542.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/article_17542.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Equality Before Law: Why Must Every Employee Litigate?</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17544</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17544</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Equality before law in public-service pay matters requires consideration of whether employees in the same cadre, governed by the same pay rules and affected by a common anomaly, are identically situated for revised pay-scale fixation. Similar relief should ordinarily follow, subject to verification of eligibility and exceptions such as delay, acquiescence, or party-specific judgments. Pay fixation and arrears require separate consideration, with continuing wrong principles and limitations remaining relevant. Authorities should assess entitlement and issue reasoned orders rather than compel repetitive litigation.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>Articles</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/article_17544.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/article_17544.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Discrimination in deductions of sums covered us 43B and payment of TDS/TCS within different last dates for filing ITR. An option can be allowed to non-audit cases to make estimated claim for payments.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17543</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17543</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Differential income-tax-return due dates affect the period available to claim deductions for outstanding statutory sums under section 43B and to deposit TDS/TCS. Business taxpayers filing on a presumptive or non-audit basis face an earlier deadline than audit and transfer-pricing cases, creating a shorter payment window. A proposed corrective mechanism would permit an estimated deduction claim for qualifying payments expected by a later specified date, with a corresponding disallowance in the following year for amounts not paid.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Articles</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/article_17543.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/article_17543.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>RECENT GSTAT RELATED UPDATES..</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17541</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17541</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Appointments to Group 'A' and 'B' posts in the Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal are regulated through recruitment requirements covering pay levels, age limits, qualifications and disqualifications. Appeals involving an identical question of law across different Benches may be consolidated through a Transfer Appeal for taxpayers with multiple GSTINs linked to the same PAN. The portal process requires case selection, verification, document upload, checklist completion and final submission. Respondents may search the relevant case, upload and e-sign a reply, review it before submission, and obtain a receipt.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Articles</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/article_17541.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/article_17541.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>FILING OF FORMS UNDER INSOLVENCY RESOLUTION PROCESS OF PERSONAL GUARANTORS TO CORPORATE DEBTOR – PART II</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17540</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17540</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Creditors may approve, modify, or reject the repayment plan at the meeting. Each proposed modification requires the debtor's consent, and approval requires support exceeding three-fourths in value of creditors present, represented by proxy where applicable, and voting. The Adjudicating Authority considers the creditor-meeting report, or the resolution professional's report where no meeting occurs, and may approve, reject, or require reconsideration of the repayment plan.]]></description>
<category>Corporate Laws</category>
<category>Articles</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/article_17540.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/article_17540.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>When Business Stands Still, Urgent Hearing Need Not Wait For Registry Scrutiny.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17539</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17539</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Urgent listing of a GST appeal may precede ordinary Registry scrutiny where cancellation of registration causes continuing commercial prejudice and delay may make appellate recourse practically ineffective. Sufficient cause requires exceptional, supported circumstances showing ongoing harm, not merely a request for priority. Registry scrutiny remains applicable, but its sequence may be adjusted under procedural powers. Early listing concerns scheduling only and does not waive limitation, statutory pre-deposit, prescribed fee, maintainability, defects or other mandatory conditions governing the appeal.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Articles</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/article_17539.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/article_17539.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Electronic GST authentication validates portal-issued demand notices, while portal upload starts limitation and RFN can replace DIN.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104701</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104701</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Electronically authenticated GST show-cause notices, adjudication orders and DRC summaries uploaded on the common portal remain valid even where taxpayer-facing PDFs display no physical or digital signature. Registered digital signature certificates, immutable electronic records, hash values and officer-certificate mapping satisfy electronic-authentication requirements; form signature fields cannot add to the Rules. Portal uploads constitute valid service and begin limitation; after the portal expressly identified the Additional Notices and Orders tab, taxpayers cannot claim ignorance of communications uploaded there, while challenges concerning earlier uploads remain open. GST communications may bear either a DIN or an independently verifi.....]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104701.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104701.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Assessment of unregistered persons must precede GST recovery proceedings, leaving educational institution exemption claims open for determination.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104700</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104700</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Section 63 assessment of a person liable to GST who failed to obtain registration must precede tax-recovery proceedings under section 74. The proper officer must issue notice and make a best-judgment assessment for the relevant period after providing an opportunity of hearing. An educational institution may raise its exemption claim in those assessment proceedings. A recovery show-cause notice issued without first initiating the section 63 process was quashed, while the Department retained liberty to issue notice in ASMT-14 and pursue assessment; the exemption claim and other contentions remained open.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104700.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104700.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Revised customs prosecution thresholds can govern pending gold-smuggling complaints, requiring reconsideration of withdrawal despite prior prosecution sanction.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104699</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104699</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Revised Customs prosecution thresholds for precious-metal smuggling may extend to pending complaints if the goods' value is below the updated limit. The later circular changes only the monetary threshold and preserves the earlier circular's other conditions. Neither circular prohibits consideration of withdrawal after prosecution sanction has issued; the Magistrate retains discretion under the earlier framework to decide whether the prosecution should continue. Where withdrawal was rejected solely because sanction had issued, reconsideration under the applicable circulars is required.]]></description>
<category>Customs</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104699.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104699.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Leasehold rights assignments in industrial plots remain outside GST where treated as benefits arising from immovable property.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104698</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104698</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Assignment and transfer for consideration of leasehold rights in industrial plots allotted by GIDC constitute transfer of benefits arising from immovable property and are not subject to GST. The jurisdictional High Court's ruling on that characterisation remained binding on the Tribunal absent a stay or recall. The department's stated intention to seek review did not diminish the ruling's binding effect. Accordingly, GST was not leviable on the assignments, and the departmental appeals were dismissed.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104698.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104698.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Pre-deposit timing turns on final acknowledgement, allowing a timely defect cure before appeal registration and merits consideration.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104697</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104697</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Under the Explanation to Rule 110(4) of the CGST Rules, an appeal is filed only upon issuance of the final acknowledgement. A mandatory pre-deposit made after provisional acknowledgement, but within the time allowed to rectify a defect and before final acknowledgement, satisfies the pre-deposit requirement under Section 112(8). The timing objection is therefore treated as cured, enabling registration and admission of the appeal for consideration on merits.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104697.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104697.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Proportionality review restricts reduction of FERA penalties unless the sanction is grossly excessive, unduly harsh, or conscience-shocking.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104696</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104696</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Judicial review of the quantum of a FERA penalty permits interference on proportionality grounds only where the sanction is grossly excessive, unduly harsh, or so disproportionate that it shocks the court's conscience. A Tribunal cannot reduce a penalty without demonstrating and giving reasons that this high threshold is met; its reduction was therefore unsustainable. FERA penalty adjudication follows proof of breach of a statutory civil obligation, without requiring mens rea. Absence of criminal intent or monetary gain does not legally justify a reduced penalty. The appellate outcome restored the penalty imposed by the Adjudicating Authority after setting aside the Tribunal's reduction.]]></description>
<category>FEMA</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104696.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104696.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Offshore supply receipts remain outside Indian taxation where CIF title passes abroad and contracts are genuinely separate.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104695</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104695</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Separate offshore-supply, domestic-supply and domestic-service contracts in a transmission project need not be treated as artificial splitting merely because project safeguards, acceptance testing and performance obligations apply. Where goods are supplied on CIF terms and title passes outside India, offshore-supply receipts are not taxable in India. An Indian associate conducting an independent business does not create a fixed-place or dependent-agent permanent establishment without legal, economic or other dependence. The presumptive computation provision for turnkey power projects does not extend to receipts from mere offshore supply under a separate contract.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104695.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104695.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Income Declaration Scheme declarations can evidence share-capital sources, while round-tripped funds and cash-linked credits require further verification.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104694</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104694</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Income Declaration Scheme declarations provide personal immunity only to declarants, but an accepted, tax-paid declaration may evidence the true source of share-capital and share-premium credits in another taxpayer's books where it specifically covers the credits and remains unrebutted; taxing that same income again risks double taxation. Before the source-of-source proviso applied, the taxpayer's burden for such credits was limited to identity, genuineness and creditworthiness, although apparent routing of its own advances through intermediaries required verification of commercial rationale. A banking trail alone does not exclude prior cash funding, requiring examination of relevant admissions. A search statement directly linking accommoda.....]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104694.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104694.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Business set-up versus commencement determines deductibility, while appellate findings require consideration of contemporaneous operational evidence.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104693</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104693</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Business set-up is distinct from commercial commencement: once a division is established and ready to perform its functions, expenditure cannot be denied solely because commercial operations have not begun. Contemporaneous evidence recording completion of the first phase and commencement of production supports the division's operational status; subsequent financial distress or action against assets cannot retrospectively alter that status. Appellate authorities must consider written submissions and material evidence, including annual reports, and provide reasoned findings rather than merely adopting assessment reasoning. Expenditure of a newly established division cannot be categorised wholesale as capital; deductibility of each item remains subject to applicable statutory conditions.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104693.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104693.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Mandatory GST credit reversal on unsold completed units becomes deductible project cost when final allocation crystallises.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104692</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104692</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Mandatory reversal of GST input tax credit attributable to unsold units on project completion converts the extinguished credit into an irrecoverable project cost, deductible as business expenditure when final project-wise allocation crystallises. The reversal is not a voluntary write-off or correction of an earlier error, even where no fresh cash payment arises, because GST on inputs has been paid and the related credit becomes unrecoverable. The deduction for credit attributable to unsold completed units is allowable in AY 2022-23. A related post-completion provision requires examination in AY 2023-24 and may be allowed in only one assessment year to prevent double deduction.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104692.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104692.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Permanent establishment tests: independent subsidiary premises and principal-to-principal dealings did not create Indian taxability for offshore supplies.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104691</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104691</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Fixed place permanent establishment requires evidence that the foreign enterprise has a right to use or control the Indian subsidiary's premises for its business; group-wide Form 10-K and website material do not establish that condition. A subsidiary relationship alone is insufficient. Dependent agency permanent establishment also requires authority to conclude contracts or habitual order securing for the foreign enterprise. Independent principal-to-principal dealings, the subsidiary's separate manufacturing operations, and a licence arrangement confined to royalty-bearing products did not satisfy those conditions. Neither form of permanent establishment arose, so no Indian profits were attributable to the disputed offshore supplies and the attribution was deleted.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104691.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104691.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Electronic receipt of DRP directions triggers the final-assessment deadline, rendering delayed faceless assessments time-barred and invalid.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104690</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104690</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Electronic upload of DRP directions on the ITBA module constitutes receipt of those directions in a faceless assessment. The final assessment must therefore be completed within the period prescribed under section 144C(13), calculated from that upload date. Where the final assessment is completed after the prescribed period, it is time-barred and liable to be set aside. Other assessment grounds remain open where invalidity is determined solely by limitation.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104690.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104690.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Gifted share holding periods include prior ownership, but indexation begins only when the donee's deemed cost is taxed.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104689</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104689</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Gifted unlisted shares taxed on receipt under section 56(2)(x) retain their character as assets acquired by gift for determining the holding period. The previous owner's holding period is included, so a subsequent transfer may produce long-term capital gains. However, section 49(4) separately fixes the donee's cost at the value previously taxed under section 56(2)(x); it does not carry over the prior owner's cost. Consequently, indexation of that deemed cost begins only in the financial year in which it was taxed, not in an earlier ownership period.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104689.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104689.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>National Highways acquisition compensation remains income-tax exempt, while delayed-payment interest is taxable as income from other sources.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104688</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104688</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Compulsory-acquisition compensation under the National Highways Act that remained unpaid on 31 December 2014 and was received in FY 2015-16 qualified for exemption under section 96 of the RFCTLARR Act. The exemption applied notwithstanding the absence of a specific corresponding exemption in the Income-tax Act, resulting in deletion of the long-term capital-gains addition. Interest received for delayed payment of that compensation was separately taxable as income from other sources under binding jurisdictional High Court precedent. The capital-gains addition was deleted, while the addition for delayed-payment interest was sustained.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104688.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104688.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Valuation Officer estimates govern property-value additions once statutory valuation is invoked, requiring fresh consideration of objections and comparables.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104687</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104687</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[In faceless assessments involving a reference to the Valuation Officer, limitation is computed by reference to the Assessment Unit's receipt of the report through the prescribed channel, not merely the assessee's emailed copy. Exclusion of the reference period and the statutory extension of the remaining period can preserve the assessment's timeliness. For property acquired below stamp duty value, once the statutory valuation process is invoked, assessment must conform to the Valuation Officer's estimate rather than revert to stamp duty value. Methodology objections, comparable sales, independent valuation evidence and a subsequent sale require consideration in a fresh valuation, although later sale evidence is corroborative rather than determinative.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104687.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104687.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Waiver of written show-cause notice may prevent a later procedural challenge after participation in customs adjudication, preserving statutory appellate remedy.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104685</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104685</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Section 124's first proviso permits oral notice at the concerned person's request and requires a genuine, effective opportunity to know and answer the allegations rather than service of a prescribed written form. Where an importer expressly waived a formal show-cause notice, participated in customs adjudication, and raised no contemporaneous objection, the absence of a separate written notice did not constitute a jurisdictional defect permitting recourse to writ jurisdiction despite the statutory appeal. The importer was relegated to the appellate remedy, with merits left open. No separate provisional-release direction was issued because detention was under consideration in another writ proceeding and interim relief could be sought before the appellate forum.]]></description>
<category>Customs</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104685.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104685.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Customs detention charges cannot be imposed after clearance, requiring release of imported goods and preserving inter-party claims.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104684</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104684</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Customs detention regulations prohibit recovery of rent or demurrage on goods detained or seized by Customs. Following reassessment and payment of duty, imported Low Alloy Steel Scrap remained entitled to physical release; delays caused by Customs authorities, a shipping line, or a custodian could not be imposed on the importer. The High Court required the shipping line and custodian to issue delivery orders and release the goods without detention charges, container detention charges, ground rent, or demurrage for the certified detention period, while leaving their inter se claims to be resolved according to law.]]></description>
<category>Customs</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104684.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104684.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Premature GST summons challenges fail where summons merely seek information and no coercive recovery or arrest threat is evidenced.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104678</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104678</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Writ jurisdiction was not invoked against repeated GST summons that only sought information and documents, where the recipient had already submitted a representation with relevant copies. In the absence of evidence of coercive recovery or a threat of arrest, the summons did not establish a basis for judicial interference. The writ petition was treated as premature and rejected.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104678.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104678.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>GST appellate hearing rights protect appeals from dismissal over limitation, authority and interest-only pre-deposit objections.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104677</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104677</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[GST appellate procedure requires a hearing before disposal, including where limitation, signatory authority or pre-deposit is disputed. Delay may be condoned on sufficient cause within the further statutory period; no separate affidavit is prescribed. A company's authorised signatory may validate an appeal under a general power of attorney, and deficient proof of authority is curable. In interest-only appeals, alternative computations do not constitute an admitted liability, and statutory pre-deposit is confined to tax in dispute. Interest on differential GST runs from invoice-based tax liability despite customer non-reimbursement; cum-tax valuation applies only where the stated value includes tax. Interest demands for delayed GSTR-3B payments must account for documented interest already paid through reasoned adjudication.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104677.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104677.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Input tax credit mismatch requires documentary verification; non-appearance alone cannot end a GST appeal without merits review.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104676</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104676</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[GST appeals should not be rejected solely for non-appearance where sufficient cause exists and the substantive input tax credit dispute remains unexamined. A mismatch between GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A/GSTR-2B does not, by itself, establish wrongful ITC availment; compliance must be verified against invoices, books of account, supplier details, payment records and other transaction evidence. For FY 2017-18 pending proceedings, the applicable verification mechanism should be applied. A subsequently issued CA/CMA certificate may be considered as corroborative evidence if verifiable from contemporaneous records. Fresh determination should address the mismatch, certificate, ledgers and reconciliation before sustaining tax, interest or penalty.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104676.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104676.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Retrospective invalidity of ocean-freight IGST supports refunds despite non-party status and prior credit utilisation, subject to authorised appeal grounds.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104675</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104675</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Judicial declarations invalidating the reverse-charge IGST levy on imported ocean freight operate retrospectively unless expressly limited, rendering the levy void from inception. Taxpayers who were not parties to the invalidating proceedings may rely on that declaration for refunds, except where their own unsuccessful challenge to the levy has attained finality. A departmental representative may challenge only grounds authorised by the Commissioner. Utilisation of IGST credit does not by itself create double benefit or unjust enrichment where unutilised CGST and SGST credits of equivalent value can be debited. Refunds are therefore supportable, with statutory interest for delay.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104675.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104675.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>E-Way Bill Omissions Without Tax Evasion Attract General Penalty, Not Detention Penalty for Bonded-Warehouse Return Transit</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104674</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104674</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Return transit of duty-paid imported goods to a bonded warehouse after an aborted delivery, supported by import and customs-clearance documents and showing no quantity discrepancy, is treated as a logistical fallback rather than an unrecorded commercial movement. Section 129 detention and confiscatory penalty should not apply to a fresh e-way bill omission where the transaction is accounted for, duty has been paid, and no intent to evade tax or revenue loss exists. Such bona fide transit-documentation defaults attract only the general penalty under Section 125; the Section 129 penalty and related orders were set aside.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104674.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104674.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Statutory delay limits in GST appeals remain binding, but restored registrations can render departmental challenges infructuous.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104673</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104673</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Statutory appellate authorities may condone delay in GST appeals only within the enactment's prescribed outer limit; equitable considerations or High Court directions issued under extraordinary jurisdiction cannot enlarge that power. Where the Department implemented an appellate order by restoring cancelled GST registrations, its subsequent challenge became infructuous because reversal could disrupt intervening transactions and input tax credit without workable consequential relief. Taxpayers retain an independent right to appeal registration cancellation when the common portal prevents a delayed revocation application; failure to seek revocation under Rule 23 does not extinguish that appellate remedy.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104673.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104673.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Additional evidence in departmental appeals may include show-cause-notice material without introducing a new case where it merely corroborates existing record.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104672</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104672</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Documents already relied upon in a show cause notice do not constitute new evidence when placed before the appellate forum. An additional ground may identify the corroborative effect of existing record material without introducing a new case. Further judicial authorities may be cited, and reliance on previously cited authorities may be withdrawn. The departmental appellant was permitted to file the existing documents and amend the appeal, subject to supplying copies to the respondent.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104672.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104672.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Cash received by property-sale mediator falls outside loan or deposit rules, preventing penalty where reasonable cause exists.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104671</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104671</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Cash received and subsequently routed through a bank by an assessee acting solely as a mediator in a property transaction between relatives was treated as neither a loan nor a deposit for the cash-acceptance restriction. The intermediary role, supported by documents and evidence, established reasonable cause and attracted statutory protection from penalty. Consequently, the penalty for accepting cash as a loan or deposit was deleted.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104671.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104671.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Reassessment based on unverified audit objections fails where cess was unclaimed and subsidiary investment interest satisfies commercial expediency.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104670</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104670</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Reassessment founded on an audit objection requires the Assessing Officer to verify the record and independently apply mind. An allegation that health and education cess had been deducted could not support reassessment where no such deduction was claimed and the audit premise was unverified. Interest on borrowed funds invested in a subsidiary must be assessed through commercial expediency from a prudent businessperson's standpoint; reassessment could not proceed where that governing principle was not distinguished on recorded facts. The reassessment notices and order were quashed.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104670.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104670.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Reasoned rectification orders require consideration of expenditure disclosed in income-tax returns, preventing revision based on incomplete income computation.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104669</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104669</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Revision of an income-tax intimation requires consideration of expenditure disclosed in the return when computing income; overlooking that material indicates non-application of mind. The revision order was quashed because it proceeded on an incomplete computation. Rejection of a rectification application must be reasoned and address the taxpayer's claim. As the rejection communication and original intimation neither considered disclosed expenditure nor gave reasons, both were quashed. Fresh rectification was directed to be reconsidered after examining the return.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104669.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104669.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Section 263 revision cannot replace an Assessing Officer's reasoned inquiry into already examined accommodation-entry information.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104668</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104668</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Revisional jurisdiction under section 263 requires an assessment order to be both erroneous and prejudicial to Revenue interests. Revision cannot rest merely on Insight Portal information that the Assessing Officer already examined during reassessment, where the officer considered explanations and supporting evidence showing that the alleged accommodation-entry transactions did not concern the assessee. The revisional authority must identify discrepancies in the material examined or conduct further inquiry; it cannot substitute its view merely because additional inquiry was possible. Sufficient inquiry by the Assessing Officer distinguishes an impermissible review for allegedly inadequate inquiry from a valid revision based on lack of inquiry.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104668.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104668.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Modified returns after business reorganisations cannot trigger fresh scrutiny once the original assessment was complete, invalidating related transfer-pricing proceedings.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104667</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104667</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Section 170A(2)(a) limits a modified return filed after business reorganisation, where assessment or reassessment had already concluded, to adjusting total income to implement the reorganisation. It does not permit the modified return to be treated as a return under section 139 or to initiate fresh scrutiny under section 143(2); information may be sought only to verify implementation. Transfer-pricing jurisdiction initiated on the premise of valid pending scrutiny does not survive if that scrutiny notice lacks authority. A writ challenging the assumption of statutory jurisdiction remains maintainable despite assessment participation or an appellate remedy. The scrutiny and consequential transfer-pricing proceedings were quashed.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104667.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104667.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Third-party loose sheets require reliable nexus before supporting unexplained expenditure additions; presumptions do not establish payer identity or ownership.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104666</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104666</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Third-party loose sheets may trigger investigation but cannot, without reliable evidence linking the assessee to the recorded transaction, prove unexplained expenditure. Presumptions attached to seized documents apply to the person from whose possession or control they are recovered; they do not establish the alleged payer, source or movement of funds. Actual incurrence is foundational, so an uncorroborated allegation cannot shift the burden of proof. Nor does a third-party reference establish ownership of unrecorded money; the statutory requirements for unexplained money and expenditure are distinct. These deficiencies made both additions unsustainable. Evaluation of material already on the assessment record does not amount to admitting additional evidence.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104666.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104666.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Revisionary jurisdiction fails where examined, plausible exemption claims for compulsory-acquisition interest are challenged solely on taxability.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104665</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104665</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Revision under section 263 is unavailable where the Assessing Officer has examined a claimed exemption, considered supporting explanations and adopted a plausible view; a different view of the revisional authority does not establish an order that is both erroneous and prejudicial to the Revenue. Interest awarded under section 28 of the Land Acquisition Act for delayed payment of enhanced compensation on compulsorily acquired agricultural land was treated by the majority as an accretion to compensation rather than income from other sources. Accordingly, the revisionary order was quashed and the receipt was not assessed under that head.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104665.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104665.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Unverifiable Purchases: accepted sales support profit-element addition, while transaction-specific intelligence sustains reassessment jurisdiction and limits remand.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104664</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104664</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Transaction-specific investigation information identifying the taxpayer, supplier and disputed transaction can support reassessment under the substituted regime after pre-notice procedure; its Investigation Wing origin alone does not make it vague. A retrospective clarification permits a Jurisdictional Assessing Officer to issue the reassessment notice. Where corresponding sales, purchase records and banking evidence exist but the named supplier is untraceable and does not comply, purchases cannot be wholly disallowed; absent evidence that payments returned in cash, addition is limited to the embedded profit. The disputed-purchase addition was restricted to 6%. A monetary-limit exception for departmental appeals affects maintainability but does not itself require vacating the appellate order or remanding assessment.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104664.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104664.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>TNMM comparability using audited accounts and working-capital adjustments can eliminate unwarranted transfer-pricing additions where verified margins fall within range.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104663</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104663</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Under TNMM, audited annual accounts and reports provide a reliable basis for comparability analysis over unaudited raw data. Verified working-capital-adjusted margins must reflect differences between tested international transactions and comparable uncontrolled transactions; where the taxpayer's margin falls within that range, no transfer-pricing adjustment is warranted. A claimed duplicate disallowance of interest on income tax requires verification whether a voluntary disallowance was already made in the return; any repeated disallowance must be deleted. Employees' provident fund contributions are deductible only if deposited by the due date under the relevant fund law, requiring verification.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104663.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104663.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Proportionate common-expenditure deduction protects taxable non-member receipts; cellular-tower terrace rent is house-property income with statutory deductions.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104662</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104662</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Common expenditure proportionately allocated to taxable non-member receipts of a mutual concern is deductible where the expenses are genuine, relate to earning those receipts, and the allocation method has been consistently followed; an estimated restriction without disclosed basis or cogent material cannot stand. The disallowance was deleted. Rent from terrace space leased to a cellular operator for a tower was treated as income from house property, attracting statutory deductions rather than income from other sources. The appeal succeeded on those issues. The challenge to the scrutiny notice for alleged non-compliance with CBDT instructions was dismissed because a cited Special Bench ruling covered the issue against the assessee.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104662.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104662.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Gross-profit additions on disputed purchases require reasoned appellate determination; disclosed claims alone do not support inaccurate-particulars penalties.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104661</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104661</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[An appellate authority cannot, after finding the unexplained-expenditure provision inapplicable, delegate determination of the gross-profit rate and consequential addition to the Assessing Officer. Any gross-profit addition must rest on a reasoned determination and cannot be mechanically applied to disputed purchases that include capitalised items without examining genuine comparables, alleged inflation, and differential margins; fresh speaking adjudication is required. Penalty for furnishing inaccurate particulars does not arise merely because a disclosed bad-debt write-off or unpaid-interest claim is disallowed. Where audited accounts, ledgers, liability, and payment details were disclosed, and no falsity, fabrication, suppression, or del.....]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104661.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104661.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Post-search reassessment: Statutorily deemed income-escape information requires section 148 proceedings instead of continued scrutiny assessment under the new framework.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104660</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104660</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Post-1 April 2021 searches are deemed under Explanation 2(i) to section 148 to provide information suggesting that income has escaped assessment. This statutory deeming requires reassessment proceedings under section 148 rather than continuation and completion of a scrutiny assessment under section 143(3). Completing a scrutiny assessment despite the prescribed procedure creates a jurisdictional defect, rendering the assessment invalid. The requirement concerns the mandatory procedural route following a qualifying search.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104660.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104660.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Cash credit verification deletes unsupported unsecured-loan addition but requires fresh examination of flat-sale receipts and purchaser deposits.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104659</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104659</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Section 68 treatment of unsecured loans requires lender non-compliance with notices to be assessed alongside other record material; non-compliance alone does not establish unexplained cash credit. A credit relating to an earlier financial year falls outside the relevant previous year, and bank-channel receipt and repayment supported the other loan; the unsecured-loan addition was deleted. Flat-sale consideration claimed as already taxed requires verification against books and assessment records, so that issue remains for assessment verification. Corpus-fund and society deposits cannot be treated as unexplained or yield notional interest merely because the society was unformed or funds were retained; however, purchaser-wise evidence must be examined before their character and source are determined.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104659.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104659.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Net taxable income after charitable-exemption denial requires verification of admissible expenditure rather than taxation of gross receipts.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104658</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104658</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Denial of charitable exemption under section 11 does not by itself justify taxing an educational trust's entire gross receipts. Taxable income must ordinarily reflect real income, determined after verification and allowance of genuine expenditure otherwise admissible in law, unless a provision requires taxation on a gross basis. The computation was restored to the assessing authority to examine the books and determine net taxable income after verifying the claimed expenditure; the appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104658.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104658.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Limitation after transfer-pricing remand: fresh TPO reference did not extend the assessment deadline, rendering the consequential assessment time-barred.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104657</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104657</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Assessment limitation following remand of a transfer-pricing issue is governed by section 153(3) where the remand is to the Assessing Officer under Rule 28 and requires verification and a hearing. A fresh reference to the Transfer Pricing Officer, absent fresh satisfaction under section 92CA(1), does not attract section 153(4) or extend the completion period; the consequential assessment was therefore quashed as time-barred. Although quoting a DIN in Dispute Resolution Panel directions is mandatory, omission from the directions did not invalidate them where a separate authenticated intimation identified the directions and carried the DIN. The DIN objection was rejected.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104657.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104657.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Agricultural land compensation outside municipal limits avoids capital-gains tax; structure compensation permits cost-of-acquisition deduction in compulsory acquisitions.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104656</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104656</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Compulsory-acquisition compensation for agricultural land in the Hazira Notified Area was not chargeable to capital-gains tax because the land lay outside a municipal area, retained its agricultural character, and was used for agricultural operations. The resulting capital-gains addition on land compensation did not survive. For compensation attributable to built-up structures and other assets acquired with the land, 60 per cent of the relevant compensation was allowable as cost of acquisition when computing consequential capital gains.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104656.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104656.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Interim judicial restraint on tax deduction prevents default, while supporting reasonable cause and penalty deletion for foreign-leg LFC reimbursements.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104655</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104655</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:27:44 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Interim judicial restraint preventing treatment of foreign-leg Leave Fare Concession reimbursements as income for tax-deduction purposes meant the deductor did not breach an enforceable deduction obligation; tax-default demands and consequential interest were therefore deleted. Subsequent substantive taxability could not retrospectively turn compliance with the subsisting direction into a default. Compliance with that direction also constituted statutory reasonable cause, supporting deletion of non-deduction penalties. Institutional delays in penalty appeals were condoned where multi-level approvals, lost portal access after personnel changes, and access resetting showed sufficient cause without deliberate delay, mala fides, benefit to the deductor, or prejudice to revenue.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104655.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104655.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
<item>
<title>TMI Updates - Newsletter dated: October 09, 2026</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/newsletter?id=10/09/2026</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/newsletter?id=10/09/2026</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Newsletter for tax updates and legal information]]></description>
<category>Daily Updates</category>
<category>Tax</category>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>