Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Alternative GST remedy permitted protective writ intervention for ex parte adjudication, preserving independent appellate review of input tax credit d...
Assessment against deceased sole proprietor requires proceedings against the legal representative, rendering prior assessment and appellate orders inv...
Residential waste collection classification under SAC 999423 defeats composite-supply exemption where facilitating goods are not transferred to the lo...
Condonation of delay permits statutory appeal restoration where inadequate service explanation prevented consideration of reassessment and taxable-inc...
Execution of Conveyance deed - Home Buyers / Commerical property - entitlement to receive the payment of rent as assured in the MoU entered with the allottees and the erstwhile management. - The Adjudicating Authority refused the appellant's prayer for the execution of a Conveyance Deed, stating that there was no specific prayer made in the application for this relief. Additionally, the Authority held that during the CIRP, the RP is responsible for managing the affairs of the Corporate Debtor, including decisions regarding the execution of contracts. The NCLAT also cited a previous judgment indicating that the rights of homebuyers cannot be adversely affected during CIRP, but the manner of protection depends on the RP's decisions.
Execution of Conveyance deed - Home Buyers / Commerical property - entitlement to receive the payment of rent as assured in the MoU entered with the allottees and the erstwhile management. - The Adjudicating Authority refused the appellant's prayer for the execution of a Conveyance Deed, stating that there was no specific prayer made in the application for this relief. Additionally, the Authority held that during the CIRP, the RP is responsible for managing the affairs of the Corporate Debtor, including decisions regarding the execution of contracts. The NCLAT also cited a previous judgment indicating that the rights of homebuyers cannot be adversely affected during CIRP, but the manner of protection depends on the RP's decisions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
