<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
    <channel>
        <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed?type=Highlights" rel="self" type="text/xml" />
        <title>Tax Updates - Daily Update</title>
        <link>https://www.taxtmi.com</link>
        <description>One stop solution for Direct Taxes and Indirect Taxes and Corporate Laws in India</description>
        <category>Business/Tax/Law/GST/India/Taxation/Policies/Legal/Corporate Tax/Personal Tax/Vat Law/Legal Information/Tax Information/Legal Services/Tax Services</category>
        <copyright>TaxTMI.Com / MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved.</copyright>
        <lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 21:36:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
        <language>en-us</language>
        <webMaster>webmaster@taxtmi.com</webMaster>
        <managingEditor>editor@taxtmi.com</managingEditor>
        <ttl>60</ttl>
        <item>
<title>PMLA twin bail conditions remained unsatisfied as alleged fund diversion, flight risk, and imminent trial defeated regular bail.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101862</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101862</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 21:27:39 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Regular bail under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act remained subject to the statutory twin conditions, which the petitioner did not attempt to satisfy. The High Court noted allegations that homebuyers' funds were diverted through group concerns, repeated evasion of summons and warrants, and an attempted flight on apprehension, supporting the assessment of flight risk. It found that trial had reached cognizance and was due to commence without foreseeable prosecutorial delay; custody was not substantial in the circumstances. Bail granted to a co-accused did not establish parity. Regular bail was therefore refused.]]></description>
<category>PMLA</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_101862.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_101862.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Specified income tax exemption for pollution control body remains conditional on non-commercial activity, unchanged income character, and return filing.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101858</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101858</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 21:27:39 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Delhi Pollution Control Committee is notified for exemption of specified income under section 10(46) of the repealed Income-tax Act, 1961, preserved for relevant proceedings by the transitional provisions of the Income-tax Act, 2025. Exempt income includes government grants or subsidies, statutory consent, licence and application fees, environmental penalties and fines, and interest on surplus-fund deposits or investments. The exemption applies only if the Committee undertakes no commercial activity, retains the same activities and income character, and files its income return as required. Non-compliance may trigger penal action and withdrawal of the exemption. The notification applies to the specified assessment years from 2024-25 through 2026-27.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_101858.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_101858.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Principal purpose test curbs treaty shopping under the amended India-Sri Lanka income tax treaty from fiscal year 2027-28.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101857</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101857</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 21:27:39 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[The India-Sri Lanka tax treaty is amended to expressly prevent non-taxation or reduced taxation arising from tax evasion, avoidance and treaty-shopping arrangements that indirectly benefit third-State residents. It also introduces a principal purpose test: treaty benefits may be denied where, considering all relevant facts and circumstances, obtaining the benefit was one of the principal purposes of an arrangement or transaction, unless granting it accords with the object and purpose of the relevant treaty provisions. The Protocol entered into force on 19 June 2026 and applies in India to income derived in fiscal years beginning on or after 1 April 2027.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_101857.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_101857.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Tax exemption for statutory pollution-control income applies subject to non-commercial operations, filing, continuity, and compliance.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101856</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101856</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 21:27:39 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Tax exemption applies to specified income of the Delhi Pollution Control Committee under Schedule III read with section 11 of the Income-tax Act, 2025. Exempt income includes government grants or subsidies, statutory consent, licence and application fees, environmental penalties and fines, and interest on deposits or investments of surplus funds. The exemption applies for tax years 2026-27 and 2027-28, subject to the committee not undertaking commercial activity, filing its income-tax return as prescribed, and maintaining unchanged activities and income character. Non-compliance results in withdrawal of the exemption and initiation of proceedings under the Act.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_101856.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_101856.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Standing instructions for demat mutual fund SWP and STP will enable phased unit-based and amount-based automated transactions.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101855</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101855</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 21:27:39 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[The facility to create standing instructions for Systematic Withdrawal Plans and Systematic Transfer Plans is extended to mutual fund units held in demat form. Phase I will enable unit-based instructions for redemption or transfer of a fixed number of units at specified intervals, to be implemented by January 31, 2027. Phase II will enable amount-based instructions for fixed periodic payouts or purchases in another scheme of the same mutual fund, to be implemented by April 30, 2027. Depositories must act as nodal facilitators, jointly publish an operational framework by October 31, 2026, amend relevant rules, make necessary system changes, and publish the circular. The circular takes immediate effect.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_101855.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_101855.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Typographical e-way bill discrepancies without tax evasion warrant only minor penalty, not detention proceedings under Section 129.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101854</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101854</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 21:27:39 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[A typographical discrepancy between e-way bill particulars and tax invoices, where goods otherwise correspond with the e-way bill and transport documents, is treated as a human error when it provides no benefit and does not indicate tax avoidance. The notes state that such a minor inadvertent mistake, without intent to deceive the Revenue or financial implications, should attract only the minor penalty under clause 5 of the circular dated 14 September 2018, rather than detention and penalty action under Section 129. The Section 129 penalty order was quashed, with refund of the deposited amount after deduction of the applicable minor penalty.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Show cause notice and hearing are mandatory before penalty, making an unnotified penalty unsustainable for natural justice breach.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101853</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101853</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 21:27:39 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Imposition of a penalty without issuing a show cause notice or affording a hearing breaches the statutory discipline governing penalties and the principles of natural justice. As the revenue did not dispute that no notice initiating penalty proceedings was issued, the High Court found the petitioner had been denied the required opportunity to respond. The penalty was therefore unsustainable, and the writ petition was disposed of accordingly.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Duplicate input tax credit demands cannot target identical supplier transactions, while proceedings concerning distinct suppliers remain available.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101852</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101852</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 21:27:39 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Multiple show cause notices for alleged wrongful input tax credit cannot duplicate tax demands arising from the same supplier transactions. The High Court treated the later notice and consequential order as unsustainable to the extent they covered seven suppliers already included in an earlier proceeding, and quashed the duplicated portion. Proceedings concerning two additional suppliers were preserved, with the taxpayer retaining the statutory appeal remedy against that part of the later order. The material therefore distinguishes impermissible duplication of liability from separate allegations involving suppliers not covered by the original notice.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Jurisdictional facts in certificate-of-origin discrepancies can support customs show-cause proceedings, leaving factual explanations for departmental adjudication.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101851</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101851</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 21:27:39 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Judicial review of customs show-cause notices may be invoked where jurisdictional facts are absent, including where a notice relies on undisclosed or inconclusive overseas enquiry material. The discussion distinguishes that situation from notices supported by identifiable discrepancies in certificates of origin. A certificate not issued by the stated authority, or an unreconciled mismatch between the certificate's invoice number and the importer's invoice, can provide a factual basis for customs proceedings. Referral of a certificate for further investigation does not itself cure an apparent discrepancy. The importer's explanation is to be examined by the competent customs authority during adjudication.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Specific grounds in GST cancellation notices are essential; cancellation based on an unnotified ground was quashed and registration restored.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101850</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101850</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 21:27:39 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[GST registration cancellation requires a show cause notice to state the specific proposed grounds and provide supporting documents so that the registered person can respond effectively. The notes explain that the notice alleged fraudulent registration, invoicing without supply, and non-operation from the declared business premises, whereas the cancellation order relied on non-filing of consecutive returns, a ground not notified to the taxpayer. On that basis, the cancellation proceedings were quashed and registration restored, while the Revenue retained liberty to issue a fresh, specific notice and determine the matter according to law.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Statutory appellate remedy for GST registration cancellation limits writ jurisdiction despite an unconsidered revocation representation.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101849</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101849</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 21:27:39 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Availability of a statutory appeal against cancellation of GST registration is presented as barring recourse to writ jurisdiction. Section 107 of the CGST Act permits an aggrieved person to challenge any order before the appellate authority, including a cancellation order. The discussion notes that a pending representation seeking revocation does not make the appellate remedy unavailable. It also refers to Section 75(4), which requires a hearing where requested in writing by the person chargeable with tax or penalty, or where an adverse decision is contemplated. The writ petition was disposed of with liberty to pursue the statutory appeal, while merits issues remained open.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Extended input tax credit timelines protect delayed returns filed before the statutory cut-off, subject to documentary eligibility.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101848</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101848</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 21:27:39 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Section 16(5) extends the time-limit for claiming input tax credit where the relevant returns were filed before 30 November 2021. The material states that denial based solely on the earlier Section 16(4) deadline is unsustainable in such circumstances, subject to the claimant otherwise satisfying eligibility requirements. It describes partial relief setting aside denial of credit for delayed filing of specified returns and requiring reconsideration under Section 16(5). A separate denial based on absence of supporting documents remains unaffected, so documentary substantiation continues to govern admissibility of the credit.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Occupancy Certificate determines project completion, preserving GST credit benefit restitution for identifiable homebuyers while barring retrospective penalties.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101847</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101847</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 21:27:39 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[For GST anti-profiteering in an ongoing real-estate project, completion is reckoned from actual issuance of the Occupancy Certificate, not from filing the application. The discussion states that post-GST input tax credit benefits may be quantified by comparing pre- and post-GST ITC-to-purchase-value ratios using certified actual data, and apportioned to purchasers. Where homebuyers are identifiable from supplier records, the profiteered amount must be returned to them with interest; deposit in Consumer Welfare Funds is residual where recipients cannot genuinely be identified. It also notes that a penalty provision introduced after the investigation period cannot apply retrospectively without express statutory authority.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Genuine hardship in revised-return delays requires pragmatic consideration where consistent relief exists for similarly placed voluntary retirement retirees.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101846</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101846</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 21:27:39 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Genuine hardship in delayed revised-return filings is addressed in relation to refunds of tax deducted at source from ex gratia compensation received under the BSNL Voluntary Retirement Scheme. The text states that consistent Tribunal relief for similarly placed retirees, where those decisions had attained finality, required a pragmatic and liberal approach to condonation. It records that rejection of condonation without due consideration of those decisions was quashed, with fresh merits consideration after permitting revised returns.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Unexplained investment requires reliable evidence; telescoping fails without timing linkage, while fixed-deposit additions exclude maturity accretions.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101845</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101845</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 21:27:39 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Unexplained investment in residential property is to be assessed on reliable evidence: an insurance proposal is only an estimate, while the taxpayer's disclosed estimate may be accepted where supported by statements and accounts. Expenditure claimed for old land and building requires evidence and remains unexplained if unproved. Telescoping of undisclosed cash receipts against property investment is unavailable without material showing that both relate to the same period. Unaccounted fixed-deposit additions should be confined to the actual amounts invested, not their maturity values. The discussion describes modification of the property-investment addition, sustenance of the cash-receipts addition, and restriction of the fixed-deposit addition to actual investment.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Minimum alternate tax does not apply to statutory bodies outside the Companies Act, leaving book-profit disallowance challenge unsustainable.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101844</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101844</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 21:27:39 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Minimum Alternate Tax under section 115JB does not apply to a statutory body constituted under a Central enactment that is not incorporated under the Companies Act, despite being assessable as a company under the Income-tax Act. Applying the principle that the legal fiction in section 115JB cannot extend to such entities, the High Court found the provision inapplicable. Consequently, the issue of disallowance under section 14A in computing book profit did not survive, as it depended on section 115JB applying. No substantial question of law arose, and the Revenue's appeals were dismissed.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Reassessment based on inapplicable share-transaction information fails when disclosed intraday profit does not match the recorded reopening reasons.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101843</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101843</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 21:27:39 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Reassessment based on inapplicable information is examined where recorded reasons allege manipulated share transactions involving capital gains or losses, but the taxpayer's actual transaction was an intraday share trade with disclosed business profit. The notes state that, where the alleged transactions do not exist in the taxpayer's case and the disclosed profit remains below the reopening threshold cited in the reasons, the factual foundation for reopening fails. They further note that a Tribunal order quashing such reassessment was not interfered with because no substantial question of law arose from those factual findings.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Surplus interest-free funds rebut interest disallowance, while section 14A computations cannot alone increase minimum alternate tax book profit.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101842</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101842</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 21:27:39 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Surplus interest-free funds support a presumption that investments were funded from those sources, where such funds exceed the investments. On that basis, interest expenditure could not be disallowed or capitalised as capital work in progress when the building had already been put to use in earlier years. The text also states that a disallowance computed under section 14A read with rule 8D cannot, merely for that reason, be added to book profit under section 115JB. It records that the appellate deletions were upheld, as the issues were covered by binding decisions and concurrent factual findings, with no substantial question of law arising.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Electronic filing delay in charitable trust audit reporting warranted condonation where genuine hardship arose from clerical omission.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101841</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101841</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 21:27:39 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Electronic filing delay in Form 10B may constitute genuine hardship where the audit report and Form 10 were obtained before the return was filed but were not uploaded due to an inadvertent clerical omission connected with the trust's Chartered Accountant. The notes state that the applicable CBDT circular covered the relevant assessment year and that an earlier decision involving the same trust required a non-pedantic approach to technical compliance. The rejection of condonation was quashed, requiring condonation of the delay and enabling consideration of the charitable-income exemption claim.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Market value for captive electricity consumption follows industrial consumer tariffs, supporting profit computation for the power generation deduction.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101840</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101840</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 21:27:39 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[For computing profits of a captive power undertaking under section 80IA(4), the market value of electricity used internally is described as the tariff at which the Electricity Board supplies electricity to industrial consumers. The rate paid by the Electricity Board for surplus electricity generated is not treated as the relevant market value because it is set through statutory regulation and contractual arrangements rather than the rate payable by an industrial consumer. The note states that this approach supports computation of the eligible deduction for captive power generation.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Unverifiable purchases warrant only embedded-profit estimation when accepted sales and records show actual goods were procured.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101839</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101839</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 21:27:39 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Primary purchase evidence, accepted sales and unrejected books may discharge the purchaser's burden unless the Revenue produces independent material showing sham supplies or return of consideration. A supplier's failure to substantiate its own procurement chain, alleged excess mining, or direct dispatch to customers does not alone justify disallowance. Where purchase evidence is deficient but sales, audited accounts and quantitative records are accepted, only the profit embedded in unverifiable purchases may be estimated, using the disclosed gross-profit ratio; complete disallowance would create artificial profits. A closing-stock balance in seized electronic records requires corroboration and cannot stand where incomplete consumption entries create a notional, improbable stock figure unsupported by physical stock or other defects.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Reasonable cause for journal-entry loan transfers can protect genuine restructuring transactions from penalties for prescribed loan acceptance modes.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101838</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101838</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 21:27:39 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Journal-entry transfers of outstanding loans during restructuring of related concerns may constitute reasonable cause for non-compliance with the prescribed mode of loan acceptance where the original loans were received through banking channels, no cash movement occurred, and the transactions are genuine. The notes explain that journal entries are a recognised method of recording business transactions and that penalty protection may apply if there is no adverse finding of non-business use or movement of money. On the stated facts, transfer of genuine loans through journal entries to support a business takeover and financial transition was treated as supported by reasonable cause, resulting in deletion of the remaining penalty.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Commercial nexus of facilitation services supports deduction of commission expenditure against income from other sources.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101837</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101837</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 21:27:39 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Commission expenditure claimed against income from other sources may be deductible where evidence establishes a direct commercial nexus between the facilitation services and the commission earned. Customer purchase orders and sales records may demonstrate the payee firm's customer relationships, overlapping product trade, infrastructure and network. Where the payment is taxed in the recipient's hands and actual payment through banking channels is undisputed, such material can support admission of additional evidence and allowance of the deduction under section 57.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Reassessment limitation for pre-2021 assessment years invalidated a belated notice, while unsupported share-sale cash-credit additions were deleted.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101836</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101836</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 21:27:39 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[For assessment years beginning on or before 1 April 2021, the first proviso to section 149(1) preserves the pre-Finance Act 2021 limitation for reassessment notices. The note states that a notice for AY 2016-17 issued after the earlier six-year period was time-barred, rendering the reassessment and consequential assessment invalid. It further addresses additions under section 68 on sale proceeds of unquoted shares: where acquisition, holding and sale were supported by banking records, balance-sheet disclosures, sale bills and purchaser confirmations, and no evidence linked the assessee to an alleged cash trail, sale proceeds could not be treated as unexplained cash credit. An ad hoc profit addition without substantive material was also deleted.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Cash repayment of explained family loans between spouses warranted reasonable cause, requiring deletion of the repayment penalty.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101835</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101835</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 21:27:39 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Cash repayment of a family loan between spouses did not justify penalty under section 271E where the loan was fully explained, used for the benefit of the family, and gave rise to no addition. The Tribunal treated both the husband-wife loan transaction and the partial repayment to the wife as family-benefit transactions, following a co-ordinate Bench decision. It held that these circumstances established reasonable cause and made the penalty unsustainable. The penalty was therefore deleted and the appeal was allowed.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Business expenditure deductibility covers independent brand promotion and unreimbursed inventory price-drop margin losses where commercially genuine and verifiable.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101834</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101834</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 21:27:39 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Advertisement, marketing and brand-promotion expenditure incurred by a super authorised mobile-phone distributor is discussed as deductible business expenditure where a lower purchase price reflects a commercial arrangement for independent regional marketing, rather than reimbursement by the brand owner. Third-party confirmation and the absence of evidence that expenditure was fictitious, inflated or unincurred support its business necessity. The notes also address price-drop credits to downstream dealers: brand-owner reimbursement is limited to unsold inventory and its invoice price, while the distributor's unreimbursed margin reversal on sold inventory may constitute a genuine, verifiable commercial loss deductible as business expenditure.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Pre-2021 reassessment limitation survives amended regime, invalidating notices issued after the former statutory time limit expires.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101833</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101833</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 21:27:39 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[The first proviso to section 149(1) preserves the earlier reassessment limitation for assessment years beginning on or before 1 April 2021. It prevents notice under the amended regime where notice was already time-barred under the pre-Finance Act 2021 limits. For A.Y. 2015-16, the note identifies expiry of the former six-year period on 31 March 2022; therefore, a section 148 notice issued thereafter is treated as time-barred, rendering the consequential reassessment unsustainable.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Third-party loose sheets require independent corroboration before supporting unexplained investment additions for alleged on-money property purchases.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101832</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101832</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 21:27:39 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[For unexplained investment in property purchases, an addition under section 69 cannot rest solely on an unauthenticated loose sheet seized from a third party. The notes state that the sheet was unsigned, not part of regular accounts, inconsistent with registered conveyance and banking records, and unconnected to the assessee or sellers. Without proof of the document's author, independent seller enquiries, evidence of on-money receipt, a cash trail, or other corroboration, the Revenue does not discharge its burden to prove understated consideration. Loose sheets or dumb documents are not substantive evidence by themselves, and suspicion cannot replace proof. The addition was deleted; issues concerning section 153C validity, the satisfaction note, and cross-examination remained open.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>BOT annuity rights are not depreciable intangible assets, while project-cost amortisation may follow provisional completion certification.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101831</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101831</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 21:27:39 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Rights to receive annuity under a BOT road concession are treated as mechanisms for recouping project costs, comparable to toll-collection rights, rather than distinct intangible assets. The notes state that the broader contractual obligations, exclusive licence and annuity-based compensation do not create a licence, franchise or similar business or commercial right eligible for depreciation; depreciation on the annuity right was therefore disallowed. Capitalised road-project expenditure may, however, be amortised when a Provisional Completion Certificate deems the project complete and open to traffic under the concession agreement and applicable CBDT circular. Accordingly, amortisation was sustained despite the disallowance of depreciation.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Provisional release of seized imports requires enhanced duty payment, bank guarantee and disclosures while customs adjudication proceeds independently.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101830</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101830</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 21:27:39 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Provisional release of seized imported multifunctional devices pending customs adjudication may be granted subject to payment of Customs-quantified enhanced duty, furnishing a bank guarantee, and providing stipulated transactional disclosures. Such conditional release operates only at the seizure stage and does not prevent Customs from continuing adjudication. The adjudicating authority must independently consider the importer's objections and contentions and determine the matter in accordance with law, without being influenced by the provisional-release arrangement.]]></description>
<category>Customs</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Strict construction of textile duty exemptions excludes omitted schedule entries, while disclosed import claims cannot trigger extended limitation.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101829</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101829</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 21:27:39 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Additional customs duty exemption for textile materials is confined to goods listed in the First Schedule to the Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act, 1957. Textile headings omitted from that Schedule by the Finance Act, 2011 no longer meet the notification condition, requiring strict construction of the exemption. The text also addresses extended limitation: where assessed ex-bond Bills of Entry disclosed the goods, classification, duties and claimed exemptions, an incorrect exemption claim alone does not establish suppression or deliberate misstatement intended to evade duty. Consequently, demands may be restricted to the normal period, with penalty not sustainable absent the required intent.]]></description>
<category>Customs</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Certificate of Origin verification procedures governed preferential customs exemption, rendering denial of treaty benefits and consequential penalty unsustainable.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101828</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101828</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 21:27:39 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Preferential customs-duty exemption under the Indo-Thailand Free Trade Agreement depends on compliance with the prescribed process for verifying a Certificate of Origin under the Interim Rules of Origin. The text states that Revenue did not follow the procedure in Notification No. 101/2004-Cus. (N.T.) before challenging the certificate's credibility. It therefore records that denial of exemption under Notification No. 85/2004-Cus. was unsustainable, as was the consequential penalty for alleged improper import. The impugned order was set aside and the appeals were allowed with consequential relief.]]></description>
<category>Customs</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>In rem liability of a conveyance survives absent owner penalty, while driver penalty for diversion of smuggled goods stands.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101827</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101827</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 21:27:39 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Penalty on the truck driver for diverting containers in an attempted smuggling of red sanders was sustained because the driver was found actively involved, and the penalty was considered already meagre. Redemption fine on the conveyance remained maintainable despite no personal penalty on the truck owner, as proceedings against the vehicle are in rem and distinct from personal action against its owner. However, the owner's non-involvement in the show-cause proceedings and the overall circumstances supported reduction of the redemption fine. The appeal was partly allowed to that extent.]]></description>
<category>Customs</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Personal guarantor liability permits SARFAESI enforcement despite corporate debtor CIRP where no guarantor insolvency application is pending.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101826</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101826</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 21:27:39 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[SARFAESI enforcement against personal guarantors may continue while CIRP is pending only against the corporate debtor, because the corporate-debtor moratorium does not extend to guarantors. The notes explain that an interim moratorium for a personal guarantor arises only when a creditor files an insolvency application against that guarantor; a demand notice alone is insufficient. They further state that IBC consolidation provisions do not apply where no guarantor insolvency proceeding exists, and that SARFAESI and debt-recovery proceedings are complementary remedies rather than mutually exclusive elections. On the stated facts, the possession notice, auction and sale certificate were restored by setting aside the contrary DRT directions; the Bank's writ petition was treated as maintainable.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Financial debt requires disbursement for time value of money; a flat allotted against service dues creates no financial creditor status.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101825</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101825</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 21:27:39 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Financial debt requires disbursement against consideration for the time value of money. A real estate allottee may be deemed to have advanced a debt with the commercial effect of borrowing only where the claimant has disbursed an amount to the corporate debtor. Where a flat is allotted solely to compensate unpaid advertisement service charges under an invoice, no such disbursement occurs. The claim therefore does not constitute financial debt, and the service provider cannot be recognised as a financial creditor under the insolvency framework.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Prima facie material and strong suspicion justified refusal of discharge in the alleged money-laundering prosecution.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101824</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101824</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 21:27:39 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Prima facie material at the discharge and charge-framing stage need only raise a strong suspicion of the accused's involvement; the court must not conduct a roving inquiry or weigh evidence as at trial. The notes state that the petitioner was a trustee when a loan was allegedly obtained through fraudulent documents, diverted from its stated purpose, and linked to laundering of proceeds of crime. On that material, the Trial Court's refusal to discharge was affirmed and the criminal revision was dismissed.]]></description>
<category>PMLA</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Suppressed turnover based on unreconciled inspection stock survives revised-return disclosure, with reduced estimated additions and penalty sustained.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101823</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101823</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 21:27:39 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Unaccounted gold and silver stock detected during income-tax inspection supported findings of suppressed purchases and consequential sales, notwithstanding a revised return filed after inspection. The article distinguishes cases where equal additions rested only on conjectural probable suppression or disclosures preceded audit, stating that inspection-based unreconciled stock differences provide material for assessment. It notes that tax paid on revised disclosure may mitigate an equal addition, but does not protect a dealer unless the failure to maintain true accounts was neither wilful nor intentional. The Tribunal's restriction of equal additions to 10 per cent was sustained. Penalty was also upheld because the dealer did not justify omissions in full and true disclosure, and the statutory penalty provision applied to established suppressed turnover.]]></description>
<category>VAT</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>All-industry duty drawback rates for specified gold and silver jewellery exports are revised through amendments to the drawback schedule.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101822</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101822</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 21:27:39 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[The all-industry rates of duty drawback for specified gold jewellery, silver jewellery and silver articles under Chapter 71 are revised by amending the schedule to Notification No. 77/2023-Customs (N.T.). The revised rates apply to tariff items 711301, 711302 and 711401, replacing the previously prescribed entries in the drawback schedule. This updates the duty drawback entitlement applicable to exports covered by those tariff items under the Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017.]]></description>
<category>Customs</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_101822.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_101822.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Specified authority composition under section 72A is amended by substituting the designated fifth committee member.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101821</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101821</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 21:27:39 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[The notification amends the composition of the specified authority constituted under the Explanation to section 72A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. It substitutes item 5 in Notification S.O. 710(E) to designate the Member (Legislation), Central Board of Direct Taxes, serving ex officio as Additional Secretary in the Department of Revenue, as a member of that authority. The amendment changes the listed membership of the committee responsible for functions assigned to the specified authority under section 72A.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_101821.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_101821.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Cost Inflation Index for financial year 2026-27 is notified, applying from the corresponding tax year onward.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101820</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101820</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 21:27:39 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[The Cost Inflation Index is prescribed at 384 for financial year 2026-27 under the Income-tax Act, 2025. The index applies to tax year 2026-27 from 1 April 2026 and to subsequent tax years, establishing the notified inflation-indexation value for the relevant period.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_101820.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_101820.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Pension fund tax exemption applies to eligible Indian investments subject to reporting, asset-use, borrowing and governance conditions.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101819</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101819</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 21:27:39 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Social Protection Fund is specified as an eligible pension fund for tax exemption on qualifying investments made in India from publication of the notification until 31 March 2030. Exemption requires timely income-tax returns with an accountant's compliance certificate, quarterly investment disclosures, and separate accounts for exempt investments. The fund must remain regulated under Omani law, use assets and earnings solely for statutory and defined-benefit obligations, avoid India-investment borrowings, and not participate in investees' day-to-day operations, subject to permitted investment-protection monitoring. Breach of any prescribed condition makes the fund ineligible for the exemption. The notification takes effect upon Gazette publication.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_101819.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_101819.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Customs tariff values revised for edible oils, brass scrap, gold and silver, while areca nut valuation remains unchanged.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101818</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101818</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 21:27:39 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Tariff values for specified edible oils, brass scrap, gold and silver are substituted for customs valuation purposes from 16 July 2026. The revised values cover crude and refined palm oil and palmolein, crude soya bean oil, and brass scrap on a per-metric-tonne basis. Separate tariff values apply to eligible gold and silver imports, specified gold bars, coins and findings, and specified silver forms, medallions and coins, subject to the stated exclusions and conditions. The tariff value for areca nuts remains unchanged.]]></description>
<category>Customs</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_101818.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_101818.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Special Additional Excise Duty on export-cleared Aviation Turbine Fuel is revised under the amended effective-rate notification.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101817</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101817</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 21:27:39 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Notification No. 08/2026-Central Excise is amended to substitute the rate specified against serial number 1 in its table with a Special Additional Excise Duty rate of Rs. 14.5 per litre for Aviation Turbine Fuel cleared for export. The revised effective rate applies from 16 July 2026.]]></description>
<category>Excise</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_101817.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_101817.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Special additional excise duty on exported petrol and diesel is revised through substituted per-litre rates effective immediately.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101816</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101816</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 21:27:39 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Special additional excise duty rates under Notification No. 06/2026-Central Excise are amended for exported petrol and diesel. The table rate for petrol is substituted with Rs. 2.5 per litre, while the rate for diesel is substituted with Rs. 15.5 per litre. These revised duty rates take effect from 16 July 2026.]]></description>
<category>Excise</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_101816.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_101816.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>India-UK CETA tariff concessions introduce preferential customs treatment, origin verification, and quota-based rates for specified United Kingdom imports.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101815</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101815</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 21:27:39 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[The notification implements the first tranche of tariff concessions under the India-UK CETA for goods imported into India from the United Kingdom. It caps basic customs duty, Agriculture Infrastructure and Development Cess, and, where applicable, Health Cess at the preferential rates specified across Tables I and II. Table III provides tariff-rate quota treatment for specified completely built motor vehicles, applying distinct in-quota and out-of-quota duty rates. Preferential treatment requires the importer to establish UK origin under applicable trade-agreement origin rules. TRQ benefits require electronic authorisation and electronic quota debit through the customs system. The notification takes effect on 15 July 2026.]]></description>
<category>Customs</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_101815.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_101815.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Forced-labour import enquiries now permit evidence gathering and recommendations to prohibit affected goods from entering India.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101814</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101814</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 21:27:39 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Para 2.50A of the Handbook of Procedures, 2023 establishes a process for determining whether imported goods were produced wholly or partly using forced labour. DGFT may initiate an enquiry on its own motion or on credible information or a supported complaint, obtain information from importers, exporters, manufacturers and other persons, and consult government bodies, stakeholders, international organisations and expert bodies. After completing the enquiry, DGFT must prepare findings and may recommend that the Central Government prohibit imports of goods found to involve forced labour under the foreign trade framework.]]></description>
<category>Customs</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_101814.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_101814.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Accredited export test reports must be considered without mandatory CRCL referral where no risk-based intervention or intelligence exists.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101813</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101813</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 21:27:39 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Exporters may voluntarily obtain test reports from NABL-accredited laboratories, Export Promotion Council-recognised laboratories or other recognised agencies to meet destination-country regulatory requirements. Where such reports are submitted and no risk-based intervention or intelligence exists, the proper officer must consider them without mandatorily referring samples to CRCL, reducing duplicate testing. Where risk-based intervention or intelligence applies, existing procedures for drawing and testing samples, including referral to CRCL or other accredited laboratories, continue. Procedures for testing import consignments remain unchanged.]]></description>
<category>Customs</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_101813.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_101813.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>GST 'as is where is' regularisation accepts lower tax positions but denies refunds and excludes unreported non-payment.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101812</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101812</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 21:27:39 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[GST regularisation on an "as is" or "as is, where is" basis accepts, as full discharge of liability for the regularised period, tax paid at the lower competing rate or nil rate claimed under a genuinely doubtful exemption entry and declared in returns. Taxpayers who paid a higher rate are not entitled to a refund. The regularisation applies where competing rate entries or divergent interpretations caused genuine doubt; it does not protect cases where no tax was paid when the dispute concerned only competing positive rates. In those cases, tax at the clarified applicable rate remains recoverable.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_101812.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_101812.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Suo-moto audit and scrutiny proposals require documented reasons, estimated evasion, DETC recommendation and range-level approval before initiation.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101811</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101811</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 21:27:39 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Proposals for suo-moto audit or scrutiny under the HGST Act, 2017 must state clear, specific and duly justified reasons, supported by available records, intelligence inputs, data analysis or another verifiable information source. Each proposal must also specify the tentative quantum of tax evasion. The concerned DETC must first examine and recommend the proposal, after which the case file must be sent to the Joint Excise and Taxation Commissioner (Range) for necessary approval. Field formations must comply strictly; suo-moto action initiated without this prescribed process will be viewed seriously.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_101811.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_101811.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Multi-year GST audit coverage requires examination of subsequent financial years through the current year for full compliance review.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101810</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101810</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 21:27:39 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Audits selected under the Haryana GST Act must cover a comprehensive period extending from the selected financial year through all subsequent financial years up to the current financial year. Officers must examine records, returns, statements and financial documents for the entire period to assess compliance, tax liability, input tax credit and other applicable statutory requirements. Field formations must conduct audits within the prescribed GST provisions and timelines; departures from these directions will be treated seriously.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_101810.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_101810.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
<item>
<title>TMI Updates - Newsletter dated: July 19, 2026</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/newsletter?id=07/19/2026</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/newsletter?id=07/19/2026</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Newsletter for tax updates and legal information]]></description>
<category>Daily Updates</category>
<category>Tax</category>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>