Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Supreme Court: Capital loss of Rs. 28,662 not carried forward</h1> <h3>Commissioner of Income-Tax (Central) Delhi Versus Harprasad And Co. Pvt. Limited</h3> The Supreme Court ruled that the capital loss of Rs. 28,662 could not be carried forward under section 24 of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, for the ... Whether the capital loss could be determined and carried forward in accordance with the provisions of section 24, when the provisions of section 12B, itself were not applicable - capital loss could not be determined and the assessee is not entitled to the carry-forward benefit because capital gains did not form part of the total income revenue's appeal allowed Issues Involved:1. Capital Loss Determination and Carry Forward: Whether the capital loss of Rs. 28,662 could be determined and carried forward in accordance with the provisions of section 24 of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, when the provisions of section 12B of the Income-tax Act, 1922, were not applicable in the assessment year 1955-56.Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:1. Capital Loss Determination and Carry Forward:The key question referred to the High Court was whether the capital loss of Rs. 28,662 could be determined and carried forward under section 24 of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, despite section 12B not being applicable in the assessment year 1955-56. The High Court had answered this question in the affirmative, but the Supreme Court re-evaluated this stance.Facts and Circumstances:- The assessee, a private limited company, purchased shares in 1952 and received bonus shares in 1953.- The shares were sold in September 1953, resulting in a claimed loss of Rs. 84,862, which was initially disallowed by the Income-tax Officer as a capital loss.- The Appellate Assistant Commissioner reduced the loss to Rs. 28,662 and classified it as a capital loss.- The Tribunal allowed the capital loss to be carried forward and set off against future capital gains.Contentions:- Revenue's Argument: The revenue contended that capital gains in section 24(2A) referred only to gains taxable under section 12B. Since capital gains were not taxable in the relevant period (April 1, 1948, to March 31, 1956), the loss could not be carried forward.- Assessee's Argument: The assessee argued that the right to carry forward a loss under any head recognized by section 6 did not depend on the taxability of income under that head. The loss should be adjustable against future capital gains under section 24.Legal Provisions and Interpretation:- Section 6: Enumerates heads of income, including capital gains.- Section 12B: Deals with the computation and taxability of capital gains, which was not applicable from April 1, 1948, to March 31, 1956.- Section 24(2A) and (2B): Allows the carrying forward of capital losses to be set off against future capital gains.Supreme Court's Analysis:- The Court emphasized that the charging provisions of the Act indicated that 'income' includes both profits and losses, and these must be computed in the manner laid down in the Act.- Since section 12B was not operative during the relevant period, capital gains or losses could not be computed or charged under the Act.- The Court clarified that the concept of carrying forward a loss is inherently tied to the possibility of setting it off against future taxable income. Since capital gains were not taxable during the relevant period, the loss could not be carried forward.- The Court noted that the assessee had not shown any capital losses in the return, claiming it as a revenue loss instead. The Income-tax Officer's finding of a capital loss was incidental and not necessary.Conclusion:- The Supreme Court concluded that during the period when section 12B did not make capital gains chargeable, an assessee was neither required to show income under that head in the return nor entitled to file a return showing capital losses for the purpose of carrying them forward.- The Court reversed the High Court's decision, ruling in favor of the revenue, and held that the capital loss of Rs. 28,662 could not be carried forward.Final Judgment:- The appeal was allowed with costs, and the High Court's judgment was reversed in favor of the revenue.Summary:The Supreme Court held that the capital loss of Rs. 28,662 could not be carried forward under section 24 of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, for the assessment year 1955-56, as section 12B, which dealt with the taxability of capital gains, was not applicable during that period. The judgment emphasized that the concept of carrying forward a loss is tied to the possibility of setting it off against future taxable income, which was not permissible in this case.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found