TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal upholds CIT(A)'s decisions on capital loss, Section 14A disallowance, helicopter charges</h1> <h3>Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle–2 (3), Mumbai Versus Shri Avinash N. Bhosale</h3> Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle–2 (3), Mumbai Versus Shri Avinash N. Bhosale - TMI Issues Involved:1. Deletion of addition on account of brought forward long-term capital loss set off.2. Restriction of addition on account of Section 14A disallowance.3. Restriction of addition on account of Helicopter/aircraft charges.4. Deletion of addition on account of Software License Charge.Detailed Analysis:1. Deletion of Addition on Account of Brought Forward Long-Term Capital Loss Set Off:The primary issue in ground no.1 pertains to the carry forward and set-off of long-term capital loss incurred on the sale of equity shares subject to Securities Transaction Tax (STT). The Tribunal referenced its earlier decision in the assessee's own case, where it was established that the long-term capital loss incurred from the sale of shares, which are capital assets, can be set off against long-term capital gains from other sources. The Tribunal highlighted that the income from the sale of these shares is exempt under Section 10(38) of the Income Tax Act, but this does not preclude the set-off of losses. They emphasized that the entire source of income is not exempt, only a part of it is, hence the loss can be carried forward and set off. Consequently, the Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision allowing the carry forward of the long-term capital loss.2. Restriction of Addition on Account of Section 14A Disallowance:Ground no.2 addresses the disallowance under Section 14A of the Act. The Tribunal noted that the disallowance calculated by the Assessing Officer exceeded the exempt income earned by the assessee. Citing precedents, the Tribunal stated that disallowance under Section 14A cannot exceed the exempt income. They agreed with the CIT(A)'s restriction of the disallowance to the amount of exempt income and dismissed the Revenue's appeal on this ground.3. Restriction of Addition on Account of Helicopter/Aircraft Charges:In ground no.3, the issue is the addition on account of Helicopter/aircraft charges. The Tribunal referred to its previous decision where it allowed only 1/7th of the expenses as personal, aligning with the CIT(A)'s findings. The Tribunal found no reason to deviate from this view and upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, thereby dismissing the Revenue's appeal on this ground.4. Deletion of Addition on Account of Software License Charge:Ground no.4 involves the addition on account of software license charges. The Tribunal cited its earlier decision, which allowed the software license charges as revenue expenditure based on the precedent set in the case of DCIT v. Integrated Technology Solutions Pvt. Ltd. The Tribunal found the CIT(A)'s reliance on this precedent justified and saw no reason to interfere with the decision. Consequently, the Revenue's appeal on this ground was dismissed.Conclusion:The Tribunal, referencing its own previous decisions and established legal principles, dismissed the Revenue's appeal on all grounds. They upheld the CIT(A)'s decisions regarding the carry forward of long-term capital loss, restriction of Section 14A disallowance, Helicopter/aircraft charges, and software license charges. The appeal by the Revenue was consequently dismissed in its entirety.
TaxTMI 