TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Amendments not retrospective: Deduction allowed for employees' PF & ESI contributions</h1> <h3>Srinivas Achar Mohankumar Versus The Income Tax Officer Ward 4 (3) (4) Bangalore</h3> Srinivas Achar Mohankumar Versus The Income Tax Officer Ward 4 (3) (4) Bangalore - TMI Issues Involved:1. Disallowance of employees' contribution to PF and ESI.2. Applicability of amendments to sections 36(1)(va) and 43B of the Income Tax Act by Finance Act, 2021.3. Levying of interest under sections 234A, 234B, and 234C of the Income Tax Act, 1961.Detailed Analysis:1. Disallowance of Employees' Contribution to PF and ESI:The primary issue in this appeal is the disallowance of employees' contribution to PF and ESI. The assessee filed the return of income for the assessment year 2018-2019 on 31.10.2018, declaring an income of Rs. 26,62,050. However, the Assessing Officer determined the total income at Rs. 1,99,97,020 under section 143(1) due to the disallowance of Rs. 1,73,34,970 for late remittance of employees' contribution to PF and ESI.2. Applicability of Amendments to Sections 36(1)(va) and 43B by Finance Act, 2021:The CIT(A) upheld the disallowance, citing that only the employer's contribution to PF and ESI is deductible under section 43B if paid before the due date of filing the return under section 139(1). The CIT(A) also relied on the Supreme Court's judgment in CIT Vs. Gold Coin Health Food Pvt. Ltd., asserting that the amendments to sections 36(1)(va) and 43B by Finance Act, 2021, are clarificatory and have retrospective effect.The Tribunal, however, disagreed, referencing the Bangalore Bench's decision in M/s. Shakuntala Agarbathi Company Vs. DCIT, which followed the Karnataka High Court's ruling in Essae Teraoka Pvt. Ltd Vs. DCIT. The High Court had held that the assessee is entitled to the deduction of employees' contribution to PF and ESI if payments are made before the due date of filing the return under section 139(1). The Tribunal further noted that the amendment by Finance Act, 2021, is not clarificatory and does not have retrospective effect. This view was supported by several Tribunal decisions, including Dhabriya Polywood Limited v. ACIT and NCC Limited v. ACIT.3. Levying of Interest Under Sections 234A, 234B, and 234C:The assessee also contested the levying of interest under sections 234A, 234B, and 234C. However, the Tribunal's decision primarily focused on the disallowance issue, and there was no detailed discussion on the interest levied under these sections.Conclusion:The Tribunal concluded that the amendments to sections 36(1)(va) and 43B by Finance Act, 2021, are not retrospective. Therefore, for the assessment year 2018-2019, the assessee is entitled to the deduction of employees' contribution to PF and ESI if paid before the due date of filing the return under section 139(1). The disallowance made by the Assessing Officer was deleted, and the appeal filed by the assessee was allowed. The Tribunal's decision aligns with the Karnataka High Court's ruling in Essae Teraoka Pvt. Ltd Vs. DCIT and other supporting Tribunal decisions. The order was pronounced on 16th December 2021.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
