Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2013 (11) TMI 359 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal Decides Revenue and Assessee Appeals, Citing Statutes and Precedents The Tribunal partly allowed both the Revenue's and the assessee's appeals, providing detailed reasoning for each issue based on statutory provisions and ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Tribunal Decides Revenue and Assessee Appeals, Citing Statutes and Precedents

                          The Tribunal partly allowed both the Revenue's and the assessee's appeals, providing detailed reasoning for each issue based on statutory provisions and judicial precedents. The order was pronounced in the open court on 17/05/2013.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Disallowance under Section 37 for fines and penalties.
                          2. Disallowance under Section 2(24)(x) read with Section 36(1)(va) for delayed payments to EPF and ESIC.
                          3. Disallowance of bad debts under Section 36(1)(vii).
                          4. Disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) for non-deduction of TDS on lease line and VSAT charges.
                          5. Disallowance of set-off for brought forward long-term capital loss and current year long-term capital loss.

                          Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Disallowance under Section 37 for fines and penalties:
                          The Revenue challenged the deletion of disallowance of Rs. 2,87,505/- under Section 37 for fines and penalties. The Assessing Officer (A.O.) disallowed this amount based on the Explanation to Section 37(1), but the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] allowed it, stating that the fines were procedural defaults imposed by the National Stock Exchange (NSE) and not statutory infractions. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, noting that the Revenue did not specify any legal violations, and procedural defaults regulated by NSE cannot be equated with statutory infractions.

                          2. Disallowance under Section 2(24)(x) read with Section 36(1)(va) for delayed payments to EPF and ESIC:
                          The A.O. disallowed Rs. 35,70,973/- and Rs. 46,229/- for delayed payments to EPF and ESIC, respectively, beyond the statutory due dates. The CIT(A) allowed the deduction based on the Supreme Court's decision in CIT vs. Alom Extrusions Ltd. The Tribunal examined whether the payments were governed by Section 43B, concluding that Section 43B does not apply to employee contributions under Section 36(1)(va). The Tribunal held that payments made within the grace period allowed by relevant circulars should be deductible, providing partial relief to the Revenue.

                          3. Disallowance of bad debts under Section 36(1)(vii):
                          The A.O. disallowed the write-off of bad debts amounting to Rs. 33,93,886/-, limiting the deduction to brokerage income. The CIT(A) allowed the full deduction based on the Special Bench decision in Dy. CIT vs. Shreyas S. Morakhia. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, referencing the jurisdictional High Court's affirmation in CIT vs. Shreyas S. Morakhia, which clarified that both the transaction value and brokerage form part of the debt, fulfilling Section 36(2)(i) requirements.

                          4. Disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) for non-deduction of TDS on lease line and VSAT charges:
                          The A.O. disallowed Rs. 44,89,619/- for non-deduction of TDS on lease line and VSAT charges under Section 194J. The CIT(A) upheld the disallowance. The Tribunal overturned this decision, citing the jurisdictional High Court's ruling in ITO vs. Angel Capital & Debit Market Ltd., which stated that these charges were reimbursements to the Stock Exchange without any income element, and thus not subject to TDS.

                          5. Disallowance of set-off for brought forward long-term capital loss and current year long-term capital loss:
                          The A.O. disallowed the set-off of brought forward long-term capital loss from A.Y. 2003-04 and current year long-term capital loss on STT-paid transactions against taxable long-term capital gains. The CIT(A) upheld the disallowance, noting the absence of records supporting the brought forward loss claim. The Tribunal confirmed the disallowance, agreeing with the Revenue that STT-paid transactions are exempt under Section 10(38) and cannot be set off against taxable gains. The Tribunal also found no evidence supporting the brought forward loss claim from A.Y. 2003-04.

                          Conclusion:
                          The Tribunal partly allowed both the Revenue's and the assessee's appeals, providing detailed reasoning for each issue based on statutory provisions and judicial precedents. The order was pronounced in the open court on 17/05/2013.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found