TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Supreme Court ruling: Delay condoned, assessee can claim Sec.43-B benefits pre-amendment</h1> <h3>CIT Versus Vinay Cement Ltd.</h3> The Supreme Court of India in 2007 ruled that the delay was condoned, allowing the assessee to claim benefits under Sec.43-B before its amendment, as the ... Claim u/s 43B - Contribution to provident fund - Held that:- assessee was entitled to claim the benefit in Sec.43-B for that period particularly in view of the fact that he has contributed to provident fund before filing of the return - Decided against Revenue. The Supreme Court of India in 2007 (3) TMI 346 - SC Order, with judges S.H. Kapadia and P.K. Balasubramanyan, ruled that delay was condoned. The court held that the assessee was entitled to claim benefits under Sec.43-B before its amendment, as the contribution to provident fund was made before filing the return. The special leave petition was dismissed.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
