TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal partially allows appeal on rental income deduction but permits excess expenditure carry forward.</h1> <h3>Improvement Trust Fatehabad Versus ITO (Exemptions), Rohtak</h3> Improvement Trust Fatehabad Versus ITO (Exemptions), Rohtak - TMI Issues Involved:1. Disallowance of 30% deduction on rental income from property held for charitable purposes.2. Non-allowance of carry forward of excess expenditure over income for subsequent years.Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:1. Disallowance of 30% Deduction on Rental Income:The assessee, a charitable trust, filed an appeal against the order of the CIT(A), Rohtak, which confirmed the addition made by the AO by disallowing a 30% deduction on rental income from property held for charitable purposes. The trust claimed a deduction under section 24(a) of the Income Tax Act, amounting to Rs. 293580 from its rental income of Rs. 978600. The AO noted that the assessee, being registered under section 12AA, is governed by the provisions of sections 11 and 12 of the Income Tax Act, which do not provide for such a deduction. The AO rejected the assessee's reliance on a coordinate bench decision and made the addition. The CIT(A) upheld this view, leading to the appeal.The Tribunal referred to the decision in ITA No. 106/Mum/2016 (Nandlal Tolani Charitable vs. ITO (E)-2(1), Mumbai), which held that the income of a trust should be computed under normal commercial principles without resorting to the computation mechanism under respective heads of income while determining income available for application under section 11. It was observed that income exempt under Chapter III of the Act does not form part of the total income and thus does not enter the computation process under Chapter IV. The Tribunal concluded that the assessee trust is not eligible for the 30% standard deduction under section 24(a) of the Act, affirming the lower authorities' decision.2. Non-allowance of Carry Forward of Excess Expenditure Over Income:The second issue involved the non-allowance of carry forward of excess expenditure over income for subsequent years. The assessee argued that the deficit of Rs. 1407083 should be allowed to be carried forward and set off against the surplus of subsequent years. Both the AO and CIT(A) dismissed this argument.The Tribunal considered the consistent judicial stance on this issue, referencing the Hon’ble Bombay High Court's decision in DIT(E) v. Gem & Jewellery Exports Promotion Council and CIT v. Institute of Banking Personnel Selection (IBPS), which allowed the set off of deficits of earlier years against the surplus of the impugned assessment year. The Supreme Court also dismissed the Revenue's SLP against this decision. The Tribunal held that in the case of a charitable trust, excess expenditure over income should be allowed to be carried forward for setting off against income of subsequent years. Therefore, it allowed the carry forward of the excess expenditure of Rs. 1113503 to subsequent years, reversing the lower authorities' orders on this issue.Conclusion:The appeal was partly allowed. The Tribunal denied the 30% standard deduction on rental income but permitted the carry forward of excess expenditure over income to be set off against the income of subsequent years. The order was pronounced in the open court on 14/01/2020.
TaxTMI 