Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2021 (10) TMI 1290 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal rules against assessee on mutuality account deficit set-off, income tax treatment, and TDS credit issues The tribunal dismissed all sixteen appeals filed by the assessee, holding that the mutuality account deficit is not eligible for set-off against income ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Tribunal rules against assessee on mutuality account deficit set-off, income tax treatment, and TDS credit issues

                          The tribunal dismissed all sixteen appeals filed by the assessee, holding that the mutuality account deficit is not eligible for set-off against income from other sources under Sections 70 and 71 of the Income Tax Act. The tribunal also upheld the CIT(A)'s decision on the taxability of income derived on principles of mutuality and the adjustment of loss from other heads of income. The issue of TDS credit in rectification proceedings was not pressed by the assessee and was consequently rejected.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Set off of deficit in mutuality account against income from other sources.
                          2. Taxability of income derived on principles of mutuality.
                          3. Adjustment of loss from other heads of income by applying the provisions of Sections 70 and 71 of the Income Tax Act.
                          4. Allowance of TDS credit in rectification proceedings.

                          Detailed Analysis:

                          Issue 1: Set off of Deficit in Mutuality Account Against Income from Other Sources

                          The primary issue in these appeals is whether the assessee's deficit in the mutuality account can be set off against its income from other sources. The assessee argued that the CIT(A) erred in law and on facts by denying this set-off. The tribunal's first round remand directions had accepted the applicability of Section 71 of the Act for the set-off claim. The assessee cited several judicial precedents supporting the set-off of losses against profits from other units under the same head. However, the tribunal found no merit in the assessee's claim, emphasizing that the mutuality account deficit is not covered under any of the five heads of income provided under Section 14 of the Act. The tribunal referred to the Supreme Court's decision in the Bangalore Club case, which laid down the conditions for mutuality benefit, and concluded that the mutuality account deficit does not qualify for set-off under Section 71.

                          Issue 2: Taxability of Income Derived on Principles of Mutuality

                          The assessee contended that the CIT(A) erred in taxing income derived on principles of mutuality. The tribunal noted that the assessee is eligible for mutuality benefit regarding the deficit account, resulting in a negative figure claimed as eligible for set-off under Section 71. However, the tribunal held that the income arising from the mutuality account would never be taxable since it satisfies the three essential ingredients for mutuality benefit. Therefore, the tribunal dismissed the assessee's appeal on this ground.

                          Issue 3: Adjustment of Loss from Other Heads of Income by Applying Sections 70 and 71

                          The assessee argued that the CIT(A) erred in not adjusting the loss from other heads of income by applying the provisions of Sections 70 and 71 while arriving at the total income. The tribunal reiterated that the legislative expression "head" of income must be taken as any of the five heads of income provided under Section 14 of the Act. Since the mutuality account deficit does not fall under any of these heads, the provisions of Sections 70 and 71 do not apply. The tribunal further referred to judicial precedents that a loss under an exempt source is not eligible for set-off against a taxable source. Consequently, the tribunal dismissed the assessee's appeals on this ground as well.

                          Issue 4: Allowance of TDS Credit in Rectification Proceedings

                          In one of the appeals, the assessee raised the issue of not allowing TDS credit of Rs. 68,989 in 154 rectification proceedings. The learned counsel for the assessee did not press this ground, considering the smallness of the amount involved. Accordingly, the tribunal rejected this ground.

                          Conclusion:

                          The tribunal dismissed all sixteen appeals filed by the assessee, holding that the mutuality account deficit is not eligible for set-off against income from other sources under Sections 70 and 71 of the Income Tax Act. The tribunal also upheld the CIT(A)'s decision on the taxability of income derived on principles of mutuality and the adjustment of loss from other heads of income. The issue of TDS credit in rectification proceedings was not pressed by the assessee and was consequently rejected.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found