Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether capital gains exempt under Article 13(4) of the India-Mauritius DTAA could be subjected to first set-off of brought forward short-term and long-term capital losses under section 74 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and whether such brought forward losses could be carried forward to subsequent years without adjustment against the current year's exempt capital gains.
Analysis: The Tribunal followed its earlier decision holding that once the current year's capital gains were admittedly exempt from tax in India under the treaty, there was no occasion to adjust brought forward capital losses against such exempt income. It further held that losses already determined and permitted to be carried forward in an earlier assessment could not be reviewed or denied in a subsequent year's proceedings merely because the corresponding capital gains of that year were treaty-exempt. The same reasoning applied to both short-term and long-term capital losses, and the Revenue's reliance on section 74 did not alter the treaty position accepted in the earlier binding tribunal precedent.
Conclusion: The Revenue's challenge failed, and the order allowing the Assessee to retain the treaty exemption on current year capital gains and to carry forward the brought forward capital losses was upheld.