Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        Note

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Tribunal upholds CIT(A) order on book profits computation under Section 115JB.</h1> <h3>Yokogawa India Ltd. Versus Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, LTU, Bangalore</h3> Yokogawa India Ltd. Versus Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, LTU, Bangalore - TMI Issues Involved:1. Computation of income under Section 115JB of the Income-tax Act.2. Treatment of brought forward losses and unabsorbed depreciation.3. Applicability of Section 10A deduction in the computation of book profits.4. Interpretation of legal provisions and judicial precedents.Detailed Analysis:1. Computation of Income under Section 115JB of the Income-tax Act:The core issue revolves around the computation of income under Section 115JB of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The assessee filed its return declaring an income of Rs. 3,26,76,628/-, computed under Section 115JB by taking the net profit as per the profit and loss account at Rs. 21,14,42,000/-. The Assessing Officer (AO) observed that the assessee attached a note to the audit report explaining adjustments for inadmissible as well as admissible deductions and setting off brought forward losses. However, the AO, relying on the Supreme Court decisions in Apollo Tyres Ltd. v. CIT and Malayala Manorama Co. Ltd. v. CIT, held that the AO has no leeway to adjust the 'net profit' declared in the books of account. Thus, the net profit as shown in the profit and loss account was treated as the book profits for the computation of income under Section 115JB.2. Treatment of Brought Forward Losses and Unabsorbed Depreciation:The AO noted that the assessee's profit and loss account showed a brought forward loss of Rs. 209.30 lakhs, which was entirely unabsorbed depreciation with no element of 'brought forward business loss.' The AO held that since the brought forward business loss was 'Nil,' no amount of brought forward loss or unabsorbed depreciation could be allowed. The CIT(A) confirmed this view, leading to the assessee's second appeal.3. Applicability of Section 10A Deduction in the Computation of Book Profits:The assessee argued that only the Software Services Division was registered as a Software Technology Park (STP) unit eligible for Section 10A deduction, which was not claimed for the assessment year 2005-06. The assessee contended that the tax payable under regular provisions was higher than the tax determined on book profits under Section 115JB, and thus, the income under regular provisions was declared. The assessee reduced Rs. 8,44,51,767/- as 'loss brought forward or unabsorbed depreciation' from non-STPI units in the computation of book profits under Section 115JB. The assessee argued that the profits or losses of 10A units should be excluded from the computation of book profits under Section 115JB, as they are exempt from MAT.4. Interpretation of Legal Provisions and Judicial Precedents:The assessee relied on various judicial precedents and interpretations, arguing that the methodology of computation under Section 115JB should exclude 10A units' profits or losses. The assessee cited decisions like CIT v. Harprasad & Co. (P.) Ltd., G.K Ramamurthy v. Jt. CIT, and others to support the exclusion of 10A units' losses from the computation of book profits. The assessee also invoked the principle that if two interpretations are possible, the one favorable to the assessee should be adopted, as held in CIT v. Vegetable Products Ltd.Tribunal's Decision:The Tribunal, after considering the rival contentions and material on record, held that the book profits computed under the Companies Act cannot be adjusted except as provided under the Act. The Tribunal referred to the decision of the Ahmedabad Bench in Fascel Ltd. v. ITO, which held that the amount of loss brought forward or unabsorbed depreciation to be reduced from book profit is as per the books of account, not as per the Income-tax Act records. Consequently, the Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s order, dismissing the assessee's appeal.Conclusion:The appeal filed by the assessee was dismissed, affirming that the computation of book profits under Section 115JB must adhere to the net profit as shown in the profit and loss account prepared under the Companies Act, without adjustments for brought forward losses or unabsorbed depreciation not reflected in the books of account.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found