Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, after the Finance Act, 1956 amended section 34(1)(a) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, a notice for reassessment could be issued at any time in respect of escaped concealed income for the war years covered by section 34(1A).
Analysis: The amended section 34(1)(a) used clear and unqualified language permitting notice to be issued at any time for escaped concealed income for years not earlier than the year ending 31 March 1941. Section 34(1A) was enacted to deal with escaped income of war years and had operated when the earlier limitation under section 34(1)(a) prevented action for those years, but after the 1956 amendment the two provisions occupied different fields. The special provision under section 34(1A) had, by 31 March 1956, worked itself out, while the amended section 34(1)(a) was intended to remove the bar of limitation for concealed income generally. The retention of section 34(1A), and the amendments to section 34(1B) and insertion of section 34(4), did not curtail the width of section 34(1)(a). The maxim generalia specialibus non derogant could not be used to cut down the plain language of the amended general provision.
Conclusion: The notice issued under section 34(1)(a) on 25 July 1958 was not barred by time, and the contention that war-year escaped income remained confined to section 34(1A) was rejected. The decision was in favour of the Revenue.